October 10, 2015

Sandra Fluke’s Boyfriend, Adam “Cutie Pants” Mutterperl, And His Radical Socialist Family

Posted on March 13, 2012 by in Articles

(Filed under: “Never mind, media, we’ll do your damned job, losers.”)

Updated: Added link to the Jewish Encyclopedia for an explanation of “traditional Jewish socialism“, amongst those who’ve chosen the socialist/marxist ideology. It’s in the first paragraph about Adam’s parents. I assumed the readers could Google something if they had questions, but I was wrong. 

Update #2: Finally, The Washington Times is now asking the right questions. Like, “Hey, Anita Dunn, what role did the White House play in having Sandra Fluke appear before congress?” This is looking bad for SKDKnickerbocker, Anita’s PR firm.

Behold! Sandra Fluke’s boyfriend, Adam Mutterperl!

Recently, it was reported that Sandra Fluke is connected to none other than 1%’er, William (Bill) Mutterperl, through her boyfriend. However, it wasn’t reported who her boyfriend is. Everyone, meet Sandra’s boyfriend, wannabe producer, and amateur stand-up comic, Adam “Cutie Pants” Mutterperl, in this video audition he submitted to a “reality” show:

Cutie pants? This guy the epitome of what everyone thought Sandra Fluke’s boyfriend would be. Maybe Adam could produce a biopic titled, “Beta Males and the Progressive Chicks Who Dig Them”.

Anyway, here are some pictures of Sandra and Adam frolicking in typical ghetto places like Spain and Italy:

The caption that Adam added to one of the Barcelona pics, “Pretty drunk”. Is this the part where I’m supposed to pay for your condoms, Adam? You know, because traveling between L.A., D.C., and New York, and vacationing in Barcelona, Italy, etc., is pretty darned expensive. I get it. Did you piss off your uber-wealthy parents to get cut off from your trust fund? You and Sandra must need some government subsidies. Idea: mock hearing. Brilliant!

Awesome that Adam is so happy about Sandra making “the big time” (h/t to SooperMexican for this particular screenshot). 

Bill and Nancy Mutterperl, Adam’s parents. Love the color of your hat, Bill. It’s reflective of your ideals.

Anyway, on to Adam’s “typical Democrat family”. The term BIll O’Reilly used to describe Bill Mutterperl is “Democratic stalwart”. However, as soon as I heard his name in a story about Sandra Fluke, I almost choked, due to my sudden epiphany. Why? Because anyone familiar with Boston and New York political history knows about the wealthy Mutterperl family’s long tradition of supporting the traditional Jewish variant of socialism. Bill Mutterperl’s family are much more than Democratic stalwarts.

I’ll let Woody Allen give you the basic overview (if Woody introduces left-wing, Jewish socialism, it’s not anti-Semitic, AMIRIGHT?!):

(Transcript of the video clip: “What’s your name… Allison… You’re like New York Jewish, left-wing, intellectual, Central Park West, Brandeis University, socialist summer camps and the father with the Ben Shahn drawings, really strike-oriented. Stop me before I make a complete imbecile of myself… No, that was wonderful! I love being reduced to a cultural stereotype.”)

Allen’s description probably describes Adam’s childhood, right down to the Ben Shahn drawings. I wonder if Adam has ever been to a kibbutz.

The Mutterperl family, via Adam’s great grandfather Sol’s handbag fortune, established the “Mutterperl Scholarship Endowment Fund” in 1951 for Brandeis University. This school, as some people call it, is named for Louis Brandeis, a secular Jew, Zionist, and United States Supreme Court Justice appointed by Woodrow Wilson. Brandeis was a self-proclaimed socialistHerbert Marcuse, the famous Frankfurt School Marxist, came to Brandeis in 1954, three years after the Mutterperl fund was created. Brandeis University is one of the nation’s leading petri dishes for anti-American and neo-Marxist thought. Here’s the statement from the Brandeis bulletin about the Mutterperl fund:

Traditions of charity inculcated in their children by a New York couple, who recently celebrated their Golden Wedding Anniversary, are being perpetuated in their honor by the children who have established a Sol and Susanne Mutterperl Scholarship Endowment Fund at Brandeis University.

Honoring the 50th wedding anniversary of Mr. and Mrs. Sol Mutterperl, the endowment fund has been established by means  of a substantial initial grant which will be augmented from time to time.

The initial grant was made by the children through the Mutterperl Foundation, Inc., which was organized in December, 1951, by Raphael Mutterperl: his brother, Martin Mutterperl, and their sister’s husband, Ludwig S. Buckhardt. for the purpose of fostering the philanthropic ideals of their parents.

President of the Foundation is Raphael Mutterperl, prominent New Bedford (Mass.) manufacturer.

Since Sol is credited with creating the women’s handbag market, and was a wealthy manufacturer and proprietor of those goods, he and his wife, Susanne, lived at 22 Central Park West in Manhattan for a time, and then at 350 Central Park West. Not too shabby, Mutterperl! Sol was also supportive of unions and was the Director of the United Jewish Appeal (now The Jewish Federations of North America) a Jewish “social” organization. From the JFNA website:

The Federation movement, collectively among the top 10 charities on the continent, protects and enhances the well-being of Jews worldwide through the values of tikkun olam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and Torah (Jewish learning).

There’s that “social justice” code word again. Jewish Socialism is linked to a very progressive concept of the above tikkun olam. New Bedford, MA, where Raphael Mutterperl ran the family’s manufacturing arm, was a hotbed of  Marxist trade-unionism in early 20th century America. Why? It was easy to “sell” radical trade-unionism to a whole people group who were brought up in the lap of Weimar Marxian ideology, because New Bedford had many new eastern-European Jewish immigrants living there at the time, including, of course, the Mutterperl family.

For some added historical context, two popular Marxists, Samuel Gompers and Daniel De Leon, agitated in New Bedford, and were instrumental in fomenting strikes amongst the workers of the textile mills there. As I wrote before, Gompers was the founder of what is now the largest Marxist union organization in America, the AFL-CIO.

In addition to the Mutterperl’s extensive history within the Jewish socialist activist/political world, and their generational wealth, they’re still doing what they can to help the 99%. An excerpt from Bill’s current Reed Smith LLP (one of the 15 largest law firms in the world) bio:

Bill is a partner in Reed Smith’s Financial Industry Group. He specializes in providing high level counseling to CEO’s, General Counsel, Boards of Directors and members of senior management of major financial institutions.

As the former Vice Chairman of The PNC Financial Services Group, he held management responsibilities for certain PNC staff functions, including legal, compliance, legislative affairs and media relations, and he was responsible for implementing best practices for corporate governance. He served on several senior management committees, including Mergers and Acquisitions, Corporate Re-Engineering and Consumer affairs, and also served as management liaison to a special ad hoc committee of the Board of Directors dealing with regulatory affairs and corporate governance. He also served as a PNC representative on the Board of Directors of BlackRock Investment Management, one of the largest investment management firms in the world.

Bill also had a distinguished 25-year career at FleetBoston Financial Corp. where he served as its Executive Vice President and General Counsel world-wide, responsible for all legal affairs of the company.

In addition, Bill served as Executive Director of the Independent Oversight Board for Arthur Andersen, headed by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker. The other members of the Independent Oversight Board included current and former CEO’s of major U.S. companies. Bill advised the Board on proposed best corporate governance practices to be adopted by Andresen in the wake of governmental investigations and criticisms of that firm.

In private practice, Bill was a partner in the business law division of Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels in Boston, specializing in corporate governance issues. He began his legal career at the law firm of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.

You’ll recall that Paul Volcker, mentioned in Bill’s bio, was Obama’s bank bailout architect, advisor, and appointee. I know! Random, right?

Bill has also made nearly $90,000 in personal donations to Dems and their allies in the past 10 years, according to OpenSecrets.org. Check out the awesome Daddy Warbucks screenshots:

Adam’s mother is Nancy Mutterperl. According to the  California Secretary of State, she’s involved with a company operating in Beverly Hills, CA as Charlotte Lu, LLC. They specialize in jewelry that runs from $300, to nearly $4000. Their website has a brief bio of Nancy, listing her role as “Business Development and Display“:

Raised in West Haven, Connecticut, Nancy Mutterperl enjoyed studying art history in college, but it was her love of jewelry that led to her earning certificates from the Gemological Institute of America. While she was a stay-at-home mom, Nancy began creating her own jewelry pieces that were sold in retail stores and catalogs. Nancy’s experience with gemstones gives her the edge for selecting beautiful stones for Charlotte Lu. Nancy is married, has two sons and resides in both Manhattan and Beverly Hills.

Stay-at-home mom, indeed. You know, typical, bi-coastal, “stalwarty” kind of stuff in the Mutterperl family. I wonder if Adam lives with mom here in Beverly Hills. From the looks of Adam’s audition video above, it’s safe to assume that mom imparted some of the “art history” stuff that she enjoyed in college, unto her son.

In summary (with bold for emphatic inflection): Sandra Fluke is a 30 year old leftist activist, attending Georgetown University, whom the Dems tried to inject, via non-sequitur, into Issa’s hearing about Obamacare’s encroachment upon religious freedoms, protected by the Establishment Clause in the 1st Amendment. Her boyfriend, Adam Mutterperl, is the son of one of the most well-connected leftist Jewish families on the East Coast (add the West Coast to that, apparently), with ties to neo-Marxist Brandeis University as decades old donors… and whose father, Bill Mutterperl, worked directly for Paul Volcker, one of Obama’s pals, advisors, and Keynesian “stimulus” bill architects. Yet, we’re supposed to believe that this just boils down to a poor girl needing us to “subsidize” her birth control. RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT!

We’re talking Sgt. Schultz levels of ignorance and avoidance if you buy that load of schmutz.

Some have claimed that Sandra’s reps (Anita Dunn’s PR firm – Anita’s the Mao lover, and former Obama Communications Director) are lying about the Mutterperl “boyfriend”. I’ve posted the Facebook photos, above, of them, that are dated, and go back a few years – but you never see them kiss in their photos. To me, it’s obvious that she’s in bed with him, literally, or figuratively. Either way, Sandra’s connection to this particular Jewish-American socialist dynasty is a “little” secret that they don’t want you to know. Which begs the question… if you’re so connected to the Mutterperl family, Sandra, why not go to Brandeis, a school much more aligned with your worldview, instead of Georgetown University, a Catholic Jesuit school? Are you admitting that a Christian school is better than a neo-Marxist school, or is there some other agenda? Now *that’s* funny when you think about it.

Based on all this random connectedness, I’d love it if Miss Fluke would sue Georgetown for “subsidized” birth control. The Georgetown lawyers would have a field day with discovery. Do it, Sandra. I dare you.

Oh, as a complete aside, check out Adam’s grandpappy, Martin Mutterperl, hanging out with Cass Sunstein’s, (another Obama appointee, Regulatory Czarina, and overall radical leftist) great-uncle, Alexander Cass Sunstein, and Samuel “Subway Sam” Rosoff, the guy who killed one of his detractors over a labor union spat, in Palm Beach back in 1965, at the Ambassador Hotel (see: photo below). Purely coincidence, I’m sure, since they’re all associated with Marxists, socialists, and trade-unionists of Eastern-European, Jewish, descent. There are some other interesting names in this list. Can you spot them?! Just kidding. Move along. Nothing to see here, hobbits.

cass sunstein's folks palling around with adam mutterperl's folks in palm beach







Share with your friends
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Google Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Print

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.soopermexican.com Soopermexican

    Oh my goodness. Absolutely nuclear… great job investigating this… gonna be fun beating in some liberal heads with this info!

    • John Clark14

       You mean “gonna be fun beating my meat as I read this info.”

      • Dick Hertz

        you sound like a man of experience.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrice-Lavin-Walker/1019088854 Patrice Lavin-Walker

        Make sure you put a sock on your hand!

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      gracias. did i say that correctly? 

      • http://twitter.com/Sailing_J Sailing J

        No genius, use a capital G

      • http://twitter.com/ced1 CED

        Why don’t you ask your mother? Her Mexican lover taught her Spanish.

    • dhnaomi

      Are you serious? None of the above has anything to do with either Fluke’s stated reasons or her actual reasons for coming to testify about insurance coverage of birth control. 

      It’s called NON-SEQUITUR, and you’ll be using it a lot if you bother with any of this.

      http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#sequitur You'll have better luck bludgeoning the nonbelievers with pillows than this nonsense.

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

        If the stated goal of this article, was to refute Fluke’s already transparently bogus claims, you may have a fragment of a point.  If it’s not worth knowing who one associates with, when taking the measure of a person veracity, who might have a smidgen of a point.

        As it is, you have no point.

        • kindness

           Oh…you mean Fluke’s claim of her friend who needed birth control pills to control her ovarian cysts?  You mean the friend who is a lesbian so she isn’t using said bcps for birth control?

          You are aware that untreated ovarian cysts leads to ovarian cancer which leads to death aren’t you?  My cousin died of ovarian cancer. 

          You are such a wonderful and considerate person.

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

            Was this lesbian friend someone who she met at a Catholic-affiliated university, too?  Perhaps they attend together for the same reason; namely, to pick a fight.

            My cousin died of ovarian cancer.

            My father (zt”l) died of metastasized lung cancer.  What of it?  I don’t want to ban cigarettes, nor do I want to ban birth control pills.  I just don’t want to allow the government to have the ability to force an institution to enable an act against their beliefs or principles.

            You are such a wonderful and considerate person.

            Actually, I think you’d be very surprised.  I don’t feel the need to compensate, by calling myself “kindness,” though.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Witty-Moniker/100000694933853 Witty Moniker

             Actually, there is a very good possibility that Georgetown covers BCPs for medicinal purposes, based on their insurance provider’s pamphlet.

            In any case, BCPs cost $9 at Target and Walmart.  I’m a college student and not too wealthy at that, yet I could afford paying $9 a month for medicine.  Heck, my work study grant pays $9/hr.

  • http://twitter.com/tbogg TBogg

    So you guys are moving from lady hating to jew-hating. Duly noted.

  • sybilll

    Adam dear, you should have applied to the “I thought evolution made wangs larger than a vienna sausage” show. 

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne


  • http://twitter.com/bikermailman Keith Pearson

    Citizen’s Journalism at its finest!  Good work!  With this crowd there are webs within webs.

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      thanks, keith! appreciate the feedback. WAR. 

  • http://twitter.com/Beckett8 Beckett

    Wow, it is like  you are – a journalist or something. Great work. 

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      don’t insult me! WAR. 

      • O P

         I think you’ve got Tourettes.  Why do you keep writing WAR?  Are you trying to convince yourself of something?  ‘Cause you’re certainly not convincing me.  Leave the basement, son.  There’s a whole world out there.

        • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne


      • euphgeek

         You’ve already insulted yourself by thinking this will in any way discredit Sandra Fluke in the eyes of anyone who doesn’t already hate her for the horrific sin of speaking out while being a woman.

  • Rexharrisonshat

    Excellent work putting this post together. Soledad O’Brien has nothing on you.

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      thank god she has nothing on me. that would be awkward, and gross. 

  • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

    for the record, my grandmother is russian jew. so, don’t even try that “jew hater” crap around here. i hate marxists equally though, regardless of their faith, or more typically, lack thereof.

    • Haha

      What does your grandmother have to do with anything? That she is allegedly Jewish doesn’t mean that you’re not antisemitic. In fact, Jewish antisemites exist too. Your defense is as pathetic as “my best friends are black”.

      You’re an antisemite, you have been exposed.

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

         If Bayne is antisemitic, then Woody Allen is antisemitic too, for the same reason.

        You’re right about there being Jewish anti-Semites, though.  The founder of the International Solidarity Movement is a Jewish anti-Semite, for example.

        • Haha

          No comparison whatsoever. Woody Allen is a Jewish comedian and he does *comedy*. Next thing you say you can use the n-word because some rappers do.

          Anyway, the point is that “Jewish grandmother” is a stupidest defense possible.

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

            You wouldn’t say that, if you had a Jewish grandmother.  Every one I knew would take you out with a guilt blast for dissing our Landsmen.

            As to rapper using that dirty word.  Yes, in fact, I’d consider them to be racist.  It’s a foul word that denigrates, and it’s a fair bet most who vote, vote for the party which has such low expectation for them, that they seek to keep treating them as less than full adults. Not that the comparison is even relevant. Blayne uses no anti-Jewish slurs that I can find.

            As to comedy…are you then saying that Woody is engaging in senseless slapstick that has no bearing on reality?  That’s not his usual style.

          • Haha

            He uses antisemitic stereotypes.  This is straight from Goebbels – he basically writes about “Jewish Bolsheviks”.

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

            I just did a search on this page for “Jewish Bolsheviks.”  It appears the only user of this particular string, is you.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrice-Lavin-Walker/1019088854 Patrice Lavin-Walker

      So what!!  I’m a Jew…what of it?

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

        The what of it, is that the lefty trolls do what lefties do best: use minorities as ablative meat shields.  After they’re done with the faux vapors, they’ll go back to agitating for Israel’s demise.

    • O P

       Yes, once you can trace your lineage back to a single person of Jewish faith/culture, you’re insulated from being accused of making antisemitic attacks.  It’s like MAGIC!

  • Pingback: Brooks Bayne Exposes Sandra Fluke’s Marxist Ties | SOOPERMEXICAN()

  • http://twitter.com/hectorclamsauce julian

    A red herring based on an ad hominen. Good work guys

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

      Could you apply some coherence to that?

      • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

        they can’t. 

      • TanzbodenKoenig

        In short: Mutterperl is a well to do gentleman who likes helping those in need so Brooks here would like to send him to Auschwitz and it proves that Sandra Fluke is a Jew-lover so Rush is off the hook.  Thats really all I could get from this odious anti-semitic word vomit of an article; brooks needs to spend less time doodling swastikas and more time breathing deeply into a paper bag.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SLV74O6XGVQGQRMBCPA5LGQRHI P Gustafson

        It’s pretty clear to me. Maybe you should use a dictionary and look up a couple words.

        • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

          I got the words just fine, it was the jumble of them together in an incoherent way that stumped me.

  • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

    Jew hate?  Really?  I don’t see it…and I’m a Jew, who had his Jew hate detector calibrated, once I saw all those antisemitic OWS signs.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2EIS37S6XO43WCFA23XHZR6TCY OMG69

    So so poor .. man if she was only 26 again so she could be on mommy and daddys healthcare .. ya know as a CHILD !!!!

  • Bl4385

    Brooks, I am sure you would hate to be completely characterized by your spouse’s family’s political persuasions. Attack her positions based on their merit or lack of it….

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrice-Lavin-Walker/1019088854 Patrice Lavin-Walker

      Sandra Fluke has no merit.


    If you had paid attention to Sandra’s testimony, you would know that she was not speaking about her own ability to afford birth control but that of other disadvantaged women who need it for medical reasons, not contraceptive reasons.  You’re as delusional as Limbaugh and as hateful, too.

    I’m sure you feel that insurance companies shouldn’t pay for Viagra. Right?

    As for the rest of your sorry excuse for journalism, Sandra Fluke’s boyfriend’s family has nothing to do with her remarks on contraception. You’ve revealed nothing of any importance or of any relation to what she said.

    • Mariebozin

      Isn’t that the point? Take the focus away from the real issues by spewing ignorance so the sheep can come and lap it up and avoid any intellectual discourse … Sadly, it is good journalism by today’s standards; I’m sure there’s a job waiting at Faux News

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

         No, the point is to show that disingenuous feminist hack is disingenuous.  The ties to an established leftist family is just icing.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrice-Lavin-Walker/1019088854 Patrice Lavin-Walker

        Is that what you refer to us as “sheep” …..if I am a sheep and you aren’t, I will gladly accept that title.  This is research at its finest…real sources..real people…real connections..  what do you do for a living?  Edit the Faux News?

      • cdg

        Your ignorance in spelling FOX News provides all I need to show how truly stupid the left really is.  FYI  FAUX is French & pronounced FO – long O.  It’s ceased being cute or smart using it

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1229872440 Brian Assanowicz

        Bozin…I am sure you would like for us all to just go back to sleep.  To accept your version of Utopia, and crash this nation right off the cliff into economic destruction.  To relinquish the national sovereignty to the “authority of the UN” or another global organization, and slip to a second class nation.

        Unfortunately for you on the left…although you have a strangle hold on academia and the media, many of us havent taken to the  indoctrination.  We post logical and factual information…and that drives people like you crazy because all you have is your pendulous emotional outbursts.

        • TF

           “Strangle hold on academia and the media”? Just the fact that  you think academia is leftist indicates that may it isn’t as wrong as you might think. I mean, it is academia. Reminds me of a good joke…

          As a senior citizen was driving down the freeway, his
          car phone rang. Answering, he heard his wife’s voice urgently warning
          him, “Herman, I just heard on the news that there’s a car going the
          wrong way on 280. Please be careful!”

          “Hell,” said Herman, “It’s not just one car. It’s hundreds of them!”

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1229872440 Brian Assanowicz

            You really arent going to argue with me that the majority of college professors arent liberals are you?  Same with the journalistas?  Guess i need to start posting links

          • O P

             Yeah, there’s something about higher education that tends to open people’s minds.  Let’s take a look at that Red/Blue map of the U.S. again, shall we?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Witty-Moniker/100000694933853 Witty Moniker

             Funny, most of the professors that I’ve known personally are quite ignorant of politics and just lap up whatever MSNBC, NYT, and NPR tell them.

          • TF

            No, I actually think I agree with you that academics tend to be liberal, but I’m suggesting that it should mean something to you other than there is a “strangle hold”.

            First, if those that are tasked with understanding how the world works tend to lean left, shouldn’t that suggest that there might be something to it? And I’m talking beyond the emotional rhetoric of “Sandra Fluke wants taxpayers to pay for her to have sex”. Even smart people on the right know that’s not what this is about. So I should hope that academics are teaching about how free access to birth control can actually lower insurance costs, improve quality of life, and generally improve the health of the country. I’m glad they see beyond the language being used to rile up a population that thrives on the disagreement with the President and the Democrats.

            Second, the fact that academics and journalists tend to be liberal shows that there is a stronger passion for education and truth among the left. It shows that academics believe there is more to living life than the Bible, and that an objective (secular) education is important to a prosperous society.

            So I don’t see this as a leftist “strangle hold”, but rather wonder how many people would want to teach in this country if there weren’t any liberals.

            It’s a shame, too. The principles on which the Republican Party was founded aren’t
            illogical to me. What bothers me is how extreme the party has become and
            what it has come to stand for. The party isn’t being true to its roots.

          • jsolbakken

             If the other guys start looking so extreme, it might be YOU who is the extremist. Just sayin’…

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

        Sandra Fluke’s boyfriend’s family has nothing to do with her remarks on contraception.

      Oh really?  She needs $3000 annually for contraceptives, and he has nothing to do with it?

      Rush was righter than he knew.

      • Effandee

        HIS FAMILY has nothing to do with it.  You attack without fully comprehending, typical of anyone of a Rush fan.

    • indyroadie

       Oddly enough, Georgetown DOES pay for contraceptives for medical reasons, and Target and Costco sell the Generic of the Pill for $9. So exactly what was the point of Fluke’s “testimony” again?

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrice-Lavin-Walker/1019088854 Patrice Lavin-Walker

        AKRNC….post the transcript of her testimony so we can all read Sandra Fluke’s remarks.  Where does Viagra fit in? …..and the 8 likes posted to your statement prove how many uninformed individuals exist.

        • madhatter90

          I posted it yesterday. Not to start an argument or anything, I just like everyone having as much knowledge as possible.

      • AKRNC

        Your reply regarding the cost of generic birth control at Target and Costco is meaningless as you can’t walk in and buy it off the shelf. You need a prescription which requires a doctor’s visit. Add that cost to it and any medical tests done prior to issuing a prescription and this is out of many student’s budgets. The very same people who are talking about how low income women can receive these medications for free are the same ones who want to shut down any clinics that are government funded. They’re demanding smaller government yet want the government to have control over a woman’s uterus. Hypocrisy at its finest.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrice-Lavin-Walker/1019088854 Patrice Lavin-Walker

      Oh how mistaken you are!!!  The author has made a clear connection….it’s a bit lengthy and may have lost your interest? 

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

        Maybe if the author enlarged the type, and kept the big words to a minimum, the more challenged here, who fail to see the point, would grasp it better.  Maybe JohnClark14 can help with that grasping.

    • gooms

       Oh really “AKRNC”? You ignorant, iil-informed lefties.

       She was  speaking for “disadvantaged women who need it for medical reasons, not contraceptive reasons.”? Young women who cannot afford or do not “access” to such?

      Well, sorry, charlie. A REPUBLICAN slayed that dragon DECADES ago. One you lefties HATE: Richard Milhouse NIXON. He passed Title X in 1970, you dimwit. You might want to look it up. I have include a link at the bottom so you can have “free access” to this information since you lefties like freebies so much.

      Any woman who needs
      contraception or a host of other health services pertaining to women who cannot afford it or is “disadvantaged” can
      get them free of charge since they passed Title X DECADES ago.

      This is
      NOT about access or the providing of “women’s health services” for poor women or providing “access”. That issue was tackled decades ago.

      This is about forcing
      religious institutions like Jesuit Universities like Georgetown and
      Catholic Hospitals to provide such services (and have do so for FREE!)
      in direct conflict with their faith and tenets. Period.

      Even if a
      student was attending Georgetown and needed contraception, she could
      still receive it via an off campus service facility under Title X.

      whole this is a fraud and a perfect example of how the administration
      locked hands with the media to “control the narrative” just like
      Breitbart told us over and over. So, we need to take it back and educate
      the folks who have been lied to and duped by this shameful act of
      misinformation and lies.
      And what a piss poor spokeswoman the dems picked as a “courageous” spokesperson
      for more attacks on religious liberty and the nanny, welfare statism they hold
      do dear! A Georgetown Law School student?

      Hey, newsflash, all you “Occupy”
      folks….Ms. Fluke is guaranteed a six figure plus salary the minute she graduates!
      That’s right; she will be an instant 1%er!

      She is worse than a fraud. She is the epitome of a weak, sad, faux-victim,
      not a strong independent woman. An Ivy league welfare queen more like it. http://www.youthlaw.org/publications/yln/2011/jan_mar_2011/the_federal_title_x_family_planning_program_privacy_and_access_rules_for_adolescents/

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

         Fact-filled and well said.  Thank you!

      • MichaelPerkins


      • http://profiles.google.com/dancewater2 dancewater water

         Here’s a link to what Sandra Fluke actually said:  http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf

      • Margie10

         Gooms, I think I love you.

      • Darren

         Don’ republicans want to repeal title X? Pretty sure one of the tea party freshman introduced a bill that would repeal it.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1407947655 Jim Turner

         That was everything that I’ve been thinking and more-absolutely nailed it!
        Thank you

      • Smoog

        Richard Milhous (not Milhouse) Nixon didn’t pass anything as President, except water.  You might want to borrow Ron Paul’s copy of the Constitution sometime.

        • gooms

          OMG Smoog, you are So right! Nixon just signed the bill after it was passed by both houses of Congress like that Constitution thingy you Paulines refer to so much dictates.

          The bill was actually championed on the Hill by former President and then-Congressman George H.W. Bush. (Yes, another republican for all you screaming memes renting your clothes about the republican’s “war on women”, fact’s suck, don’t they?)

          To Quote George Bush I: “We need to make population and family planning household words.” Bush said in 1969 when the legislation was being debated. “We need to take sensationalism out of this topic so that it can no longer be used by militants who have no real knowledge of the voluntary nature of the program but, rather are using it as a political steppingstone. If family planning is anything, it is a public health matter.”

          So sorry, Smoog, I’ll stick to the actual copy of the Constitution, not ‘Ron Paul’s copy” (I don’t like how he crossed out some key parts, the cookie crumb stains and the doodles all over the margins)

    • http://profiles.google.com/kinialohaguy Kini AlohaGuy

      She opened her testimony to the congressional committee using the word “I”, referring to herself.  Then she went on to list her acquaintances.  You obviously have selective hearing.  Under title X, these services are available for free.  She said it was an economic issue for low income women which is a falsehood.

      As for Viagra and contraception, no!   It shouldn’t be provided.  Under certain medical conditions where a woman needs a contraceptive product for a medical condition, then I have no problem with that.  When contraception is used for recreational sex, then that should be the responsibility of the individuals; and not  the responsibility of the taxpayers.  Our money could be spent on more useful endeavors.

      And why isn’t her boyfriend helping to pay for her contraception?  The boy-toy includes his own batteries, doesn’t he?  As for the boyfriend’s relevance to her testimony, it seems its all in the family.  Nudge, nudge….

  • ppjeffy

    what a  wonderful anti-Semitic rant
    go ahead and waste your time….Limbaugh sponsors are dropping like flies
    they don’t want to support hate speech against women

  • Perf

    Please continue writing material like this as we approach the election! Thanks :D

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne


      • joe from Lowell

        Are you two writing “WAR” because you’re in the White Aryan Resistance?

    • MichaelPerkins

       Oh DON’T WORRY Perv,  We got some stories for yer ass. TOO bad they involve The One. He’s in for a storm of shit landing square in his cranium, He will be Thoroughly Vetted this time, & all of his cohorts will be vetted & if You want We will Vett YOUR ass.

      • O P

         Bring it on, twerp. 

        • MichaelPerkins

           We are bringing it Fucktard, BTW if you are in Phoenix, i would love to meet & discuss who is the twerp. I don’t think your momma will let you travel yet. Well time for you to get back to your dungeons & dragons fest in her basement. LOSER.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SLV74O6XGVQGQRMBCPA5LGQRHI P Gustafson

        What’s with the Tourette’s like repetition of WAR from you oddballs? I prefer the old standard “Wolverines!”

        • MichaelPerkins

          When Breitbart Died & Leftists Glorified it by Praising his DEATH, & having someone make a fake account in his grieving Wife’s name to tell everyone she was fucking black dudes we took it as an act of war, from that day forward we will give NO QUARTER to you Losers. You wanted a fight, You got a war. It’s on. The Vetting Will be Loud Proud  & we will expose the Left’s PURE HAtred & Match it 10 fold. You fuckers started it We Will Be ending it. We have been on the high ground for too long. Time to drop to your level & Kick you Marxist Idiots square in your lack of Balls!

  • John Gorentz

    Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the 1 percent? 

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       And the OWS star chamber wannabes are frantically taking notes, and muttering, “this is good stuff.”

  • http://twitter.com/ced1 CED

    Greetings, nazis, klansmen,   and assorted racist idiots.. You are more putrid than a little bit.

  • ksec

    So you’re attacking him because he’s (gasp) a jewy jew jew? LOL wonderful hit piece there.

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       Is there a Boehlert echo in here?

    • MichaelPerkins

       No, Because he a Richie Rich Bitch that cannot supply his Libskank with a rubber, or $9 a month for pills, or decontamination, or vulcanizing his dick (or Hers) or whatever the plan to keep her Baby free. Personally the looks did it for me, I wouldn’t hit that after a case of beer…

      • pasta65

        I bet the ladies are lining up outside your door right now after reading your sexy talk.

        • MichaelPerkins

           Us conservatives have this thing called marriage. I am married for 12 years, Happily I might add. My wife thinks Fluke is a skank also, But hey I bet you are pulling all the tail what with you living in your mom’s basement and all.

          • benjoya

            someone tell rush and newt

  • http://twitter.com/sevenlayercake Skyler

    Meh, I’m Jewish, don’t see this as anti-Semitic. Talking about a particular family, not all Jews. Oy vey everyone!

  • Garyj4472


    • http://twitter.com/sevenlayercake Skyler

       Okay, THIS is an example of how NOT to make the “this article isn’t anti-Semitic point.” — Signed, a Jewish right-winger

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater
        • http://twitter.com/sevenlayercake Skyler

          Ah, makes sense ;)

        • MichaelPerkins

           new word, never heard that one. Does that mean their telling a whale of a White Lie, or that they are Dicks, or Both? I personally think Both.

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

            The term’s namesake is the musician “Moby,” who sought to apply his self-professed Christian faith, by encouraging his fellow leftists to bear false witness, and to go on internet fora, pretend to be conservatives, and pour on the racism, sexism, and other -isms with a pump, all in an effort to make conservatives look bad.

          • MichaelPerkins

             So it is both, A Lying White DICK. What ever happened to whatshisname? Window washer at the on ramp? His talent surely puts him on that track.

          • MichaelPerkins

             BTW Speaking of talentless hacks that should be pushing a rag across someones windshield for a quarter, Boehlert is a loser & doesnt rise to the prestige of a pimple on Andrew Breitbarts ass, May he Rest in Peace. I am willing to step into the breech & let em have it.

          • pasta65

            Andrew never had pimples on his butt.

            You take that back you rapscallion and put your damn breeches back on. 

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

            BTW, notice how our charming moby has only one post to its name.  Also note, that the blatantly lefty posts have 4-6 thumbs-up, as does this fraud’s post, while most of the conservative posts are up-ticked by 2 or 3 in most cases.  This clot of left-wing posts is due to Boehlert ringing his Pavlovian twitter bell, and after they post their tripe, they pat each other on the back.

            I expect some over at media mutters or kossack are having a juvenile chuckle over it.

    • Guest

      Shouting something does not make it true. The descendants of the Khazars are Muslim groups such as the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Adyghe, Ingush, and Chechens, not Ashkenazi Jews, who are of primarily Hebraic ancestry. That said, Leftist Jews are Apostates, as Judaism and Socialism are polar opposites.

      • benjoya

        tell the kibbutzim

  • Perf

    Hey guys lets means test birth control!

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       Here’s a better idea.  Let people buy it with their own money.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000274507600 Markus Gentry

    So now you’re smearing everyone associated with her, could you be more pathetic, worthless, and  disgusting losers if you tried? That question answers itself, filth. Guess what clowns, you’ll never be relevant. The truth hurts, doesn’t it?

    • http://twitter.com/sevenlayercake Skyler

      So irrelevant that you feel the need to write a comment about it to remind everyone.

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       What smear?  Cataloging facts constitutes a smear, but calling someone a “pathetic, worthless, and  disgusting losers if you tried” isn’t?

      The question answers itself, btw.

      • MichaelPerkins

         I have learned that if you drop to their level you can effectively piss them off & send em crying to Janet Napolitano. Vulgar is all they have, fortunately I am well equipped to drop to their level & give them a swift kick in their lack of balls. FEELS VERY GOOD. No wonder why Andrew loved talking to Progs & dishing it back. IT IS VERY LIBERATING. OH and Marcus… Go fuck yourself, you are a douche & you know it.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Q4QWFCOEDZWQ5N45UZEIQ3NQKU Jay

           Seeing as how these progressive morons are destroying the best country ever in the history of the world I see them as treasonous enemies.It’s past time for conservatives to treat them as the treasonous trash they are. If they prefer Communist policies {or Socialist..communism sold by the glass} they need to renounce their citizenship and take their sorry asses to Cuba, Venezuela,China , or the socialist workers paradise of their choice.

          • MichaelPerkins

             Love the attachment, Just missing Hillary, Bil Clinton, Mooshelle, Harry Reid, Pelosi, Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dorhn, Valerie Jarett, Holder, Congressional Black Caucuss, and Most of all George Soros.

          • jsolbakken

            “I see them as treasonous enemies.” I agree, but let me ask you, do you think these traitors would use something else besides accusations of racism, sexism, and homophobia if they had something else? I think that’s all they got.

    • jrcwwl

      Look at the pathetic liberal get hostile!  Looks like the truth hurts you!  Just shut up you irrelevant fool.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SLV74O6XGVQGQRMBCPA5LGQRHI P Gustafson

        “Look at the pathetic liberal get hostile!…Just shut up you irrelevant fool.” Hahahahahaha, self awareness. Give it a try.

    • falling

      Please point out the smears you see in the article.  I see nothing but factual links between the players in the little liberal melodrama we see playing out before our very eyes!  Apparently someone forgot to tell Ms Fluke that the internet is politically neutral and gives up it’s secrets to anyone interested in searching!

    • Margie10

       Smearing? By stating facts? Wow, you’re well-versed in leftist tactics, aren’t you?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R3MUJEJ2PA7HRH6FRUSLPZVUCY Cmm912

      Hey Markus,

      This is not smearing, it is simply FACTS, no smears. 

  • Alwsdad

    You forgot to find out what kind of countertops he has.  

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       The report is indeed very thorough, but I think that would just be showing off.

    • MichaelPerkins

       I don’t know what kind of countertops are either, but I hope they are jizz proof, for gods sake food is prepared on those things, & ms Fluke likes to screw A LOT on other peoples $, I am thinking… Kitchen? Yeah he did her there too.. EWWWWWW I gotta go shower.  EWWWWWW!

  • SamR

    This is a great article.  I for one think that the Republican party should definitely make the politics and religion of Sandra Fluke’s BF’s family a key point in their 2012 campaign.  

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       No, that would be falling for the regime’s efforts to distract the public from its disastrous economic mistakes, by trying to float the bogus notion that there is a war on women.

      • Simon Johnston

         Yeah keep deluding yourself, little kiddie.

        • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

          There was more derogatory epithet in your one sentence, than in the entire article.  Guess you showed me, huh?

    • MichaelPerkins

      Hey DUMBASS, Your Leftist Queen of all insanity & lies brought this slut into the pic, This is & was a non issue that YOU are pushing because Obama has nothing in that empty suit that’s going to get him re-elected. Much to your surprise, we will be vetting the kenyan this time & he will have a fight.

      • http://bit.ly/nZqExW zilong

        easy now perkie, you guys are shooting yourselves in the foot, at least do it quietly WITHOUT ALL CAPS 

        • MichaelPerkins

           Hey zischlong, Truth Hurt Retard? My NAME is Michael PERKINS, You are an Asshole. BTW  Iam NOT I REPEAT NOT your friend, you are the enemy, FUCK YOU, When I shoot something, it will not be my foot. It will be a well defined target down range. BTW Fucktard, I only Capped one word. Get a life. whats the matter? can’t find an actual cogent argument to make in defense of megaslut? didn’t think so… what a pompous asshole you are.  Go kiss Boehlert’s ass.

          • http://bit.ly/nZqExW zilong

            ahhhhhhhhhhhhh IDBOMB PERKY

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

             That’s sure a lot of caps.

            #POTS and #KETTLES

          • O P

             A spittle-flecked keyboard in someone’s mother’s basement is crying out for mercy.  Get a life.

          • MichaelPerkins

             Then you should top sputtering nonsense & move out of her basement, You can get a job, you can get a life, you can get a girlfriend/boyfriend. Follow my example, I am happily married, in a house I own my business. Someday you too may be able to afford 9 dollars for your skanks birth control.

    • pasta65

      A key point?

      Surely you jest.

      Think bigger.

      Illuminati, that’s what I am talking about and I bet you there is a Soros/Tom Hanks connection.

    • O P

       I second that!

  • Acebojangles

    You realize you’re a parody of yourself, right?

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

      I tried the Ronco Auto-Parody.  It didn’t work too well.  Made great inside-the-shell scrambled eggs, though.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrice-Lavin-Walker/1019088854 Patrice Lavin-Walker

      And you are referring to …………………

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrice-Lavin-Walker/1019088854 Patrice Lavin-Walker

    It’s so funny to read comments from individuals who clearly either did not read what you have written here, or they just don’t understand what they have read.  The connections you have made amoung all the players is outstanding!  I thank you for conducting all the research and expressing it in simple terms…that is for most of us!!!

    • Simon Johnston

       And by “most of us”, you mean, the tiny minority that believes debating public policy is simply a matter of attacking people and their family, and ignoring the actual debate.
      You right wingers are that lacking in self awareness, you have absolutely no idea just how rabid, hate-laden and childish you are coming across to the majority of Americans, do you?

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

        As if you presume to speak for the majority of Americans.  The majority of Americans aren’t led about by their noses, by the likes of media mutters, as you evidently are.

        I’d say, that claiming there are attacks, when there are none, is evidence of a lack of ideas, honesty, and basic cognition.

        • RCD

          I’d say, that claiming there are attacks, when there are none, is evidence of a lack of ideas, honesty, and basic cognition.” 

          This make no sense. 

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

             Of course it does.  Sorry if you missed it.  Any specific questions?  I’ll try to help you out.

      • MichaelPerkins

         Yep, you lefttards know all about Hate Speech, your peeps have been the purveyors of it for decades. We are just following your rules of engagement, SUCK IT UP sissyboy, we are not taking any shit from liberal douche Marxist wannabees any more. Live with it, YOU created it.

      • sgide

         Well, that’s rich. You are actually accusing right wingers of ignoring the debate and instead attacking people and their family? Have you ever heard of Sarah Palin?

        Lacking in self-awareness indeed.

  • please

    I love the  “In summary” part.   Couldn’t have said,  “I don’t actually have a worthwhile argument” better.   Oh.  My.  God!  This person might have relevant opinions and experiences!  Worse, she might associate with people that have the same or similar opinions!  Hells bells we’ve got to ignore the issue and investigate, pronto!  Seriously, wtf?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrice-Lavin-Walker/1019088854 Patrice Lavin-Walker

      Brooks scarin’ ya a bit there with the truth?  In summary is the proper way to conclude a well-written document….who do you write for?

      • please

        Well written has about as much to do with things this post has to do with the issue of contraception coverage.  But yeah, props to the author for not being illiterate, I guess.

        • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

           The article has to do with documenting a liar’s associations.  In legal lingo, it’s called “impeaching the witness.” 

        • MichaelPerkins

           For the Retarded let me summarize. Slutzilla has a Multi Millionaire Boyfriend. She can support her sex life rather easily. You are obviously afflicted with weapons grade stupidity.

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

             Ow.  That’s going to leave a mark.

          • please

            Reading comprehension problems alert!

            1)  The idiocy of the post has nothing to do with whether a summary is good writing.

            2)  Impeaching the witness is indeed viable litigation technique.

            3)  1 & 2 aren’t even ancillary to the topic at hand that Fluke, Issa’s media circus hearing, or the issue that the Catholic bishops engaged with in the first place.

            For those of you that are still operating in a this commenter disagrees with me, must attack, mode:

            Hint for #1 — the “In summary” was great because it neatly assembled the vacuity of the post in one simple paragraph.  Good writing indeed!

            Hint for #2 — this isn’t a witness at trial, it’s a person stating their opinions about a topic currently in the public domain.  Who that person associates with is flat out not relevant.  If you can, attack the content of her testimony (bonus hint:  Fluke did not refer to or say anything, nada, zilch, about her personal access to birth control, her need or lack of need for such access, or about sex at all).

          • MichaelPerkins

            Fluke did not refer to or say anything, nada, zilch, about her personal
            access to birth control, her need or lack of need for such access, or
            about sex at all.
            Then  Ms Fluke shoulda STFU. It is a non issue drummed up by leftists to try & give obama something to run on besides 20% unemployment (Real Employment not Massaged BS Numbers) 5-6 dollar gas, the fact that he knows nothing but radicals & communists. He will be vetted like no other in history this time. You dicks should be very afraid. we know all your alynsky tactics, & we will run you worthless fuckers into the gorund bu the time November rolls around. Fuck you & fuck occupy, But don’t fuck miss fluke or your dick will fall off & you’ll look like that rich prick shes dating ( Nice Green leotard, very Manly)
            In short, we are bringing the A game, We are also gonna stoop to your levels of vulgarity, & Kick you firmly in the balls every time you bring the farcical BS debate to us. WAR

          • photo111

            heheheheh. You right wing turds are done, you just haven’t noticed yet. You lost the culture decades ago and no one except a small group of repressed righties wants your social conservative agenda. it’s over. take your ball and go the fuck home. 

          • MichaelPerkins

             We haven’t even begun to fight. This is the age of new media & we rule here, we have full control of our message, we also are turning the tv off, & ignoring your propaganda. We are informing all  like minded people about your Marxist agenda, & when all is said & done this is a dominant Christian, Conservative nation. We are waking up fast & you my friend, are being exposed for the Socialist that you are.

          • photo111

            the age of new media? Judging by this article you aren’t doing too well. 

            The only people who buy into this right wing propaganda are people that were on the far right to begin with. Moderates dont buy into this, independents dont buy into this and there is really no way you will ever sway a democrat to vote republican with such nonsense. face facts: the country moved on from the shit you losers are peddling about 60 years ago. it’s over. You lost and it’s never coming back. You can preach top the choir all you want. Best of luck with that. 

          • MichaelPerkins

             Hey marxist, Just because you declare that moderates & independents don’t agree, doesn’t make it so. More people are pissed off by your Free shit for everyone till the economy collapses agenda, than you would think. You wouldn’t know, as all you watch id agritProp designed to make you dependent on handouts. Fine for bums like yourself, but some of us work for a living. I doubt that you can tell most Americans that Freedom is bad & Rule bu hyper-regulation is good. The added costs of the free shit generation are killing the dollar, destroying the fabric of America & if you think that’s good you should Move to an appropriate communist shithole of your choice or be taken out & shot as a traitor & communist sympathiser.

          • photo111

            Is everyone you disagree with a socialist, dummy? Didn’t realize that getting an insurance policy to pay for what it’s supposed to was socialist? You’re a moron and why not only the Christian religions is dead, but conservative thought. goodbye loser. 

          • MichaelPerkins

            Anybody defending some worthless cunt’s “Right” to free BC at my expense is in fact a card carrying communist Retard YES. She can buy it herself like Tens of Millions  of women, including my wife! What part of it’s not her right to free shit don’t you understand? It’s NIE Dollars a fucking MONTH, Just over 100.00 a year. For a future Lawyer she sure is stupid. & By agreeing with her You are as well.

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

             1) Are you referring to your idiotic post where you attack semantic minutia because the facts contained therein are unassailable?

            2) Your confirmation was not asked, nor needed.

            3) The media circus was what happened after the hearing.

            Your attack on the summary reads like all the bogus book “reviews” on Amazon, where the reviewer obviously didn’t read the book, because the reviewer doesn’t address the content; but just flings insults.

            Who that person associates with is flat out not relevant.

            In a trial, maybe or maybe not.  In the court of public opinion, laughably false.

            If you can, attack the content of her testimony

            Already done by others, very well, and many times over.  You don’t get to write the script for your opposition.

            (Bonus Hint: Stop reading the media mutters script.  You’ll be much better informed reading a can of soup.)

      • RCD

        Not true. “In summary” is English 101 territory. Nice try, though. 

      • O P

         We’re not running away from you in fear.  We’re walking away knowing that there’s no sense in arguing with fools.  No one is scared of you.  No one is scared of Sarah Palin (unless she bumbles her way into public office again, of course, which should frighten us all).  We just think you’re pathetic and hope that you wise up before you propagate.

  • Pingback: BOMBSHELL: Sandra Fluke an Obama-affiliated Marxist ringer « Bob Owens()

  • Tiffany A

     The more they write about Sandra Fluke and try to push their hate filled propaganda, the more they’re pushing people away and doing the opposite of what they’re attempting to do. So sad. Oh, and go ahead and call me a Liberal, feminist, etc. I happen to wear your slanderous terms like a badge of honor.

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       In using the word “propaganda,” you appear to be implying that there is material in this report which is not true.  Please point out these naughty bits, and provide evidence of their inaccuracy.

      We’ll wait.

      • MichaelPerkins

         And wait, & wait…… The people pushing the agenda are the Progs, we have the playbook retard, we are hitting back & we are done taking shit from classless marxist wannabees. Andrew is dead, but he created millions of us when You assholes started cheering & reveling in his death. It’s on BITCH, BRING IT. We can do this all day. BOOOHOOOHOOO a slut sympathiser isn’t gonna vote republican…… BIG NEWS THERE, don’t let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya.  Wear that on your sleeve.

  • http://wetcasements.wordpress.com/ wetcasements

    You Teabaggers _really_ don’t want women to vote for a Republican ever again, do you?  Or Jews for that matter.

    Keep up the good work!

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

      As is evident from the left’s response to the base and derogatory epithets, directed toward conservative women by certain high profile fellow lefties, not to mention your projective use of the charming term of “tea******,” lefties have a tin ear when it comes to basic decency.

      Oh, and don’t presume to speak for Jews.  This Jew will be voting Republican!

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_24YGMQYLMLB4JWWK2BEFIXNL6M Josh Stone

        There is no left and right. There are interests, there are individuals, and there are individuals who are unwittingly made to work for interests (which I assume is the group you fall into).

        • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

          Incorrect.  There is a left, and there is a right.  There are also certainly interests and individuals, and none are mutually exclusive of each other.

          As to the “unwittingly” part, and your assumptions…also incorrect.

          • O P

             Where would you be without an opponent, right?  There’s always someone’s head that needs bashing in, right?  Try some therapy.  It will help you deal with your anger issues.

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

            There’s always someone’s head that needs bashing in, right?

            Projection.  Compare the incidences of rape, assault, and murder at OWS loiters, and Tea Party gatherings, and get back with me.

            It will help you deal with your anger issues.

            And more projection.

          • Guest

             The right is liberal, the Left is “Liberal”.

      • http://twitter.com/DemocraticLuntz JacobAlperin-Sheriff

        Where do you daven?

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      teabagger! lol. geez, do you leftist kooks think that has any affect other than us kicking you to the curb? bye!

  • Simon Johnston

    So this is how the right wing debates policy.
    Surprise surprise.

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       Red herring.  An investigative report is not a debate, it’s an investigative report.

    • MichaelPerkins

       Yep, with factual information, instead of lies & dis-information. Lies are Liberals area of expertise, they have to lean on lies because Facts hurt their cause. They twist it every time, well, we learned how to un-twist it & toss it back at ya. Her Multi-Millionaire 1%er Boyfriend cant sport a condom, & a bag for her face? Really. You are just pissed because  Rush got it right, she’s a slut. End of story.

      • O P

         Where is the relevant factual information?  There is nothing here addressing the merits or demerits of making insurance companies pay for contraception.  This is one long red herring, intended to gin up anger because of personal associations.  Your minds are polluted.

        • http://www.facebook.com/sally.lightman Sally Lightman

          Companies/ insurance companies never pay for anything…their customers do.  A common lefty lie.

          • O P

             And if insurance companies had their way, they’d never pay for anything at all.

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

             One of the legitimate purposes of government, is the enforcement of contracts.

          • jsolbakken

             ” And if insurance companies had their way, they’d never pay for anything at all.” And who are the dummies who are going to keep paying the premiums if claims are never paid? Insurance companies are just another business offering a service to customers; I suppose that’s something stupid communists can’t wrap their empty heads around.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R3MUJEJ2PA7HRH6FRUSLPZVUCY Cmm912

          Dear OP,

          This commentary is NOT about the “merits or demerits” of contraception, it is about CONNECTING THE DOTS – something the Left HATES to have done to one of their own.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SLV74O6XGVQGQRMBCPA5LGQRHI P Gustafson

            What are the dots connected to? I’ve seen lots of replies to questions about the relevance of this ridiculous article, but I’ve never seen an ANSWER.

          • jsolbakken

            My most precious right is my right to be left alone. Requiring ME to pay higher premiums to pay for other people’s expenses is NOT leaving me alone. That is your answer. I don’t owe any of you lazy bastards a living, including paying your rent, buying your food, or providing your birth control. And don’t try claiming that I’m not being forced to pay; the whole point of the exercise is to extract more money from me and others to pay for stuff we otherwise never would pay for of our own volition.

      • Amor

        Look at how mad you are.

      • photo111

        What factual information? Again, Fluke’s testimony was not about her sex life. 

        • MichaelPerkins

          Poor Liberal, Here let me walk you through it. Whorebait tells Nancy Pelosi under oath that she was devastated financially by having to pay out of pocket 3 thousand dollars for 3 years of sluttery.She could have gone to any number of clinics & pharmacies that have 9 dollar a month BC pills, or had her millionaire BF sport condoms, or had him pull out, or gotten an iud, gone to a PP clinic & signed up for title X & gotten it for free. How is that for some facts about Her Sworn testimony?  OH that’s right you didn’t watch it. You are just going by what the politburo fed you, you comrade are doing a great job for the proletarian goals. Marx would cry. Then shoot your useful Idiot ass between the eyes.

          • photo111

            You do realize that this is not about government handing out BC right and it’s about having insurance companies pay for what they are supposed to? No of course you don’t. You’re a brain dead regressive asswipe. Now carry on. And again, Fluke never mentioned her sex life. You shitheads just enjoy shaming women. 

          • MichaelPerkins

             You did’nt watch it , or you are a professional Lying asshole. Her first sentence was for starters, I am on BC. Followed a few minutes later with her telling us of HER 3K bill for fucking every thing that moves.  She shames herself, we don’t need to do anything.

          • http://sonofliberty2k10.wordpress.com/ SonsOfLibertyRadio

            Let’s run with that for a moment: Sandra Fluke is giving “testimony”, in front of a Congressional Subcommittee, about the sex lives of OTHERS. This is what, in any court of law on the planet, would be termed “hearsay.” And summarily dismissed, if the judge had any respect for his/her title.

            So, your entire justification for ME having to pay more (either through taxes or higher ins. premiums), so college kids can have weekend frat house gangbangs, is based on hearsay. Got it?

            No life insurance company should be forced to pay out for a skydiver who refused to strap on a chute. And no health insurance company should be forced to pay out for a man or woman who does the sexual equivalent. Period.

            But, alas, Proglodytes will never understand that every “right” has a corollary responsibility.

          • photo111

            And are you paying her insurance premium? No.Also it’s kind of hard to argue with a dimwit who paints everyone who doesnt agree with his far right extremism as a “marxist” I’ll tell you who would be proud of you: Hitler and Joe McCarthy. 

          • MichaelPerkins

             No, I am NOT paying her premiums, I don’t have Health care for myself.  I have a small business & I have to make hard decisions about where to spend my money. It’s called a budget. Ms Fluke should look into the theory, instead of wanting me to subsidize her sluttery. IMO, Joe McCarthy was 100% right & didn’t go far enough. We have the fucking nanny state now with everybody';s hand out. Get a life dumbass.

          • jsolbakken

             Oh yeah, Hitler and Joe McCarthy are proud?
            Do you idiots even remember the Hitler-Stalin Pact signed a few days before Poland was invaded? Stalin the communist was best buddies with Hitler right up until Hitler made a fool of him; easy to do because communists are so foolish.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1229872440 Brian Assanowicz

      Listen here moron…the left are the ones who propped this activist up and shoved her into a discussion that was about the right of the Federal Government to force religious institutions to violate their belief systems…not contraception. She wasnt some innocent girl whom just came to Capital Hill to “tell her story”.

      I am also a wholly fed up with the blatant hypocracy coming out of the mouths of people like you.  All you guys do is target, and destroy by any means necessary. (Rules for radicals: 13. Pick the Target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.)  Sarah Palin and her family ring a bell you dolt???  Whether you agree with her or not…what her family has had to endure from you leftists is pure criminal.  And this applies not just to people like Palin, but anyone who objects to, or opposes the Progressive agenda.  Vitriolic rhetoric and hate speech is a bulwark of the Democrats and Progressives, and I encourage you to keep it up because your day is coming.

      Molon Labe

      • http://ok-cleek.com/blogs cleek

        “All you guys do is target, and destroy by any means necessary.”

        For example: digging through the family history of a private citizen, and interpolating 70+ year-old events through some century-old religious and ethnic stereotypes, in order to find a way to smear the great-grandson of the people involved in those events, in the hope of finding a way to of smear his girlfriend.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R3MUJEJ2PA7HRH6FRUSLPZVUCY Cmm912

          Dear Cleek,

          What the author here did is called VETTING.  Something I don’t expect you or any other Dem/Prog/Lib/Leftist to understand, because this is something foreign to you.

          Wait, I take that back.  The Left DOES know how to vet; they do a fantastic job vetting Conservatives or Republicans.  The Left just HATES it though, when you vet one of their own – like obama!

          • http://ok-cleek.com/blogs cleek

            “What the author here did is called VETTING”

            What you’re doing here is called RATIONALIZING. Also known as EXCUSE MAKING.

            Face it: your guy is trying to smear a woman based on the actions of her boyfriend’s great grandparents, which extra-heavy (and frankly creepy) emphasis on their ethnicity and religion. It’s despicable. But, go ahead, pretend knowing a private citizen’s boyfriend’s great-grandparents’ associations is in any way applicable to anything about the discussion over whether insurance plans should be required to offer contraception as part of baseline coverage. You’re only fooling yourself.

  • MichaelPerkins

    Typical Leftards, Replying here with heads firmly planted in their nether regions, TOTALLY Unable to discern any facts when they are given. Progressives
    are blind truly. All you read is a Anti Semitic rant. Let me guess you
    skimmed the first paragraph before jumping down here to totally
    embarrass yourself. Limbaugh is doing fine & we are taking Obama & all liberal Progressives to school. We have read Alynsky also. YOU LOSE.

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

      Bingo.  What we have here, is a sudden influx of lefty drones dispatched by media mutters, because their guru Boehlert lied about the presence of antisemitism in the report.  Of course, the fictitious antisemitism isn’t the issue; the issue is that the report makes the left wing flavor of the month look dumb.

      Well, dumber.

    • http://ok-cleek.com/blogs cleek

       just a hint: nobody in the world gives a flying fuck about Saul Alinsky but wingnuts who think he’s some kind of leftist mastermind. no, really, it’s true.

      • MichaelPerkins

        Your Master Obama worshiped the man, as well as Valerie Jarrett, Nancy Pelosi, Everybody at NBC, MSNBC , CNN, I could go on & on. He is the standard bearer for your politics. You are using his teachings every day when you come to threads like this to defend his techniques, ie throw the blame back @ the enemy. Lights are on you cockroach. now run along to your garbage heap.

        • http://ok-cleek.com/blogs cleek

          (dblpost removed)

          • MichaelPerkins

            That would be giving you credit for having a mind. Obviously NOT the case here, go away & drool on something….

        • http://ok-cleek.com/blogs cleek

          i doubt you’re as good a mind-reader as you seem to think you are.

          “ie throw the blame back @ the enemy”

          yes, Saul Alinsky invented the idea of deflecting blame during an argument. nobody had ever thought of that brilliant tactic before!


          • MichaelPerkins

            Again, you must posess a mind in order for one to read it. Just because you choose not to think, doesn’t mean that we can’t. Alynsky is one of Oloser’s favorite authors right after Bill Ayers ( who wrote both of oloser’s books). All the left has is Lie after Lie, followed by BS. The lights are on cockroach, scurry along and get some yummy fridge scum.

          • Dk

            People like you are the reason why the GOP is a dying party.  Read the tea leaves.

          • MichaelPerkins

            GOP is alive & well, get your propagandist head out of your ass, watch something besides Rachel Madcow, & CNN, it’l do you some good. Better Tea Party, Than Flea Party, fucking mutt.

          • http://ok-cleek.com/blogs cleek

            “Alynsky is one of Oloser’s favorite authors right after Bill Ayers ( who wrote both of oloser’s books).”

            “Lie after Lie”


            Luckily, Alinsky invented this thing called “irony”, too. He did it so people would have a name for posts like that.

          • MichaelPerkins

            It’s a well known fact that ayers wrote both olosers books, there are over 300 references in the books that correlate to Bills own book, none that match Obama’s known speeches that he wrote . Many nautical terms & metaphors that bill used in his book written earlier, appear in olosers books. You obviously have no independent thought at this point as you have been spoon fed the Communist party line. Marx would be proud. Keep drinking the koolaid till the last cup ( you know the one with cyanide in it) after all that is how the Communist dream always ends, with the purge of the “Useful Idiots” have fun with that… Idiot.

          • http://ok-cleek.com/blogs cleek

            Wow. That’s some awesome wingnuttery right there.

            But, I can’t tell if you’re even for real.

            I plead Alan’s 2nd Law.

    • photo111

      LOL! Coming from people who don’t even know what Fluke said during her testimony. Newsflash genius: it had nothing to do with her sex life. The story she recanted was about a friend of her’s who used the pill for ovarian cysts and due lack of coverage because of GT’s policies lost an ovary. But hey carry on, with your bullshit. 

      And the article is an epic anti-semetic rant. 

      • MichaelPerkins

        She stated that she had a problem with paying 3k over 3 years for contraception, which means that she’s a lying cunt, or a huge slut, pick one. Her alleged friend is most likely a figment of her imagination, as was her 3K bill for whoring. All her “Friend would have had to do was sign up for title x & BAM, Free Contraceptives. Don’t feel bad, you are a media whore too. Birds of a  feather….BTW some of us watched the whole thing on cspan. Lying liars & the lies the tell to reenforce their lies. Have fun with that, we have the truth. It was a lame attempt to create an issue that does not exist.

        • photo111

          Ok. The only cunt here is you. 

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

             Another member of the Bill Maher misogynists fan club.

  • Lilac Sunday

    Why is their Jewishness as much of an issue as their Marxist leanings?

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       I was sort of wondering the same thing about the media’s preoccupation with Romney’s Mormonism.

      • http://bit.ly/nZqExW zilong

        answer the first question first. 

        • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

           Not my job, nor is it your job to tell me what to say.

          • O P

             You’re not the boss of me!  Teacher!  Teacher!  Zilong’s telling me I have to answer the question! 

          • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

             Yes, leftists like a unilateral model of discourse.  Sorry, not here.

      • O P

         Deflect, deflect, deflect.  Fail.

        • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

           Deflect?  No.  Reflect?  Yes.  I’m just holding up a mirror to your hypocrisy.  No surprise you don’t like what you see.

      • Xenos66

        Assumes facts not in evidence.  Kindly support the assumption that the media has a preoccupation with Romney’s religion.   And what do you mean by ‘media’?  TV? Radio? Newspapers? Blogs?

      • photo111

        ha! the only group of people who seem to be preoccupied with Romney’s Mormonism is the Christian right.

        • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater


          You were saying?

  • madhatter90

    Leader Pelosi, Members of Congress, good morning, and thank you for calling this hearing on women’s health and allowing me to testify on behalf of the women who will benefit from the Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage regulation. My name is Sandra Fluke, and I’m a third year student at Georgetown Law, a Jesuit school. I’m also a past president of Georgetown Law Students for Reproductive Justice or LSRJ. I’d like to acknowledge my fellow LSRJ members and allies and all of the student activists with us and thank them for being here today.
    Georgetown LSRJ is here today because we’re so grateful that this regulation implements the nonpartisan, medical advice of the Institute of Medicine. I attend a Jesuit law school that does not provide contraception coverage in its student health plan. Just as we students have faced financial, emotional, and medical burdens as a result, employees at religiously affiliated hospitals and universities across the country have suffered similar burdens. We are all grateful for the new regulation that will meet the critical health care needs of so many women. Simultaneously, the recently announced adjustment addresses any potential conflict with the religious identity of Catholic and Jesuit institutions.
    When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected, and I have heard more and more of their stories. . On a daily basis, I hear from yet another woman from Georgetown or other schools or who works for a religiously affiliated employer who has suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens because of this lack of contraceptive coverage. And so, I am here to share their voices and I thank you for allowing them to be heard.
    Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy. One told us of how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn’t covered, and had to walk away because she couldn’t afford it. Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception. Just last week, a married female student told me she had to stop using contraception because she couldn’t afford it any longer. Women employed in low wage jobs without contraceptive coverage face the same choice.
    You might respond that contraception is accessible in lots of other ways. Unfortunately, that’s not true. Women’s health clinics provide vital medical services, but as the Guttmacher Institute has documented, clinics are unable to meet the crushing demand for these services. Clinics are closing and women are being forced to go without. How can Congress consider the Fortenberry, Rubio, and Blunt legislation that would allow even more employers and institutions to refuse contraceptive coverage and then respond that the non-profit clinics should step up to take care of the resulting medical crisis, particularly when so many legislators are attempting to defund those very same clinics?
    These denials of contraceptive coverage impact real people. In the worst cases, women who need this medication for other medical reasons suffer dire consequences. A friend of mine, for example, has polycystic ovarian syndrome and has to take prescription birth control to stop cysts from growing on her ovaries. Her prescription is technically covered by Georgetown insurance because it’s not intended to prevent pregnancy. Under many religious institutions’ insurance plans, it wouldn’t be, and under Senator Blunt’s amendment, Senator Rubio’s bill, or Representative Fortenberry’s bill, there’s no requirement that an exception be made for such medical needs. When they do exist, these exceptions don’t accomplish their well-intended goals because when you let university administrators or other employers, rather than women and their doctors, dictate whose medical needs are legitimate and whose aren’t, a woman’s health takes a back seat to a bureaucracy focused on policing her body.
    In sixty-five percent of cases, our female students were interrogated by insurance representatives and university medical staff about why they needed these prescriptions and whether they were lying about their symptoms. For my friend, and 20% of women in her situation, she never got the insurance company to cover her prescription, despite verification of her illness from her doctor. Her claim was denied repeatedly on the assumption that she really wanted the birth control to prevent pregnancy.She’s gay, so clearly polycystic ovarian syndrome was a much more urgent concern than accidental pregnancy. After months of paying over $100 out of pocket, she just couldn’t afford her medication anymore and had to stop taking it. I learned about all of this when I walked out of a test and got a message from her that in the middle of her final exam period she’d been in the emergency room all night in excruciating pain. She wrote, ‘It was so painful, I woke up thinking I’d been shot.’ Without her taking the birth control, a massive cyst the size of a tennis ball had grown on her ovary. She had to have surgery to remove her entire ovary. On the morning I was originally scheduled to give this testimony, she sat in a doctor’s office. Since last year’s surgery, she’s been experiencing night sweats, weight gain, and other symptoms of early menopause as a result of the removal of her ovary. She’s 32 years old. As she put it: ‘If my body indeed does enter early menopause, no fertility specialist in the world will be able to help me have my own children. I will have no chance at giving my mother her desperately desired grandbabies, simply because the insurance policy that I paid for totally unsubsidized by my school wouldn’t cover my prescription for birth control when I needed it.’ Now, in addition to potentially facing the health complications that come with having menopause at an early age— increased risk of cancer, heart disease, and osteoporosis, she may never be able to conceive a child.
    Perhaps you think my friend’s tragic story is rare. It’s not. One woman told us doctors believe she has endometriosis, but it can’t be proven without surgery, so the insurance hasn’t been willing to cover her medication. Recently, another friend of mine told me that she also has polycystic ovarian syndrome. She’s struggling to pay for her medication and is terrified to not have access to it. Due to the barriers erected by Georgetown’s policy, she hasn’t been reimbursed for her medication since last August. I sincerely pray that we don’t have to wait until she loses an ovary or is diagnosed with cancer before her needs and the needs of all of these women are taken seriously.This is the message that not requiring coverage of contraception sends. A woman’s reproductive healthcare isn’t a necessity, isn’t a priority. One student told us that she knew birth control wasn’t covered, and she assumed that’s how Georgetown’s insurance handled all of women’s sexual healthcare, so when she was raped, she didn’t go to the doctor even to be examined or tested for sexually transmitted infections because she thought insurance wasn’t going to cover something like that, something that was related to a woman’s reproductive health. As one student put it, ‘this policy communicates to female students that our school doesn’t understand our needs.’ These are not feelings that male fellow students experience. And they’re not burdens that male students must shoulder.
    In the media lately, conservative Catholic organizations have been asking: what did we expect when we enrolled at a Catholic school? We can only answer that we expected women to be treated equally, to not have our school create untenable burdens that impede our academic success. We expected that our schools would live up to the Jesuit creed of cura personalis, to care for the whole person, by meeting all of our medical needs. We expected that when we told our universities of the problems this policy created for students, they would help us. We expected that when 94% of students opposed the policy, the university would respect our choices regarding insurance students pay for completely unsubsidized by the university. We did not expect that women would be told in the national media that if we wanted comprehensive insurance that met our needs, not just those of men, we should have gone to school elsewhere, even if that meant a less prestigious university. We refuse to pick between a quality education and our health, and we resent that, in the 21st century, anyone thinks it’s acceptable to ask us to make this choice simply because we are women.
    Many of the women whose stories I’ve shared are Catholic women, so ours is not a war against the church. It is a struggle for access to the healthcare we need. The President of the Association of Jesuit Colleges has shared that Jesuit colleges and universities appreciate the modification to the rule announced last week. Religious concerns are addressed and women get the healthcare they need. That is something we can all agree on. Thank you.

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      non-sequitur strawman. we’ve all seen and her her remarks at the fake, unofficial “hearing”. even if she isn’t a slut, she should be mocked as one for the sham that she, her handlers, and the mutterperls are trying to pull. but thanks for trolling, media matters!


      • DallasResident

        Yes – There is no war on women, there is a war on freedom!  Gynescare isn’t working!

      • O P

         Oh, just stop it.  No one’s waging war.  It’s all in your mind.

      • madhatter90

        It’s a straw man fallacy to post the transcript of what someone actually said? What? I’m not sure you understand what a straw man fallacy is. It would be more like me say, ignoring what Fluke has actually said and instead attacking her position on birth control as medicine as really being an excuse for her to be a slut. I wasn’t posting it to get a response, I just think it’s a good idea to know what she said at the congressional hearing because I think a lot of people haven’t even heard if before jumping on the ‘women who take birth control are whores’ bandwagon.

  • Pingback: The latest on Sandra Fluck | Thoughts and Rantings()

  • DetroitRight

    Linked in! Good post. Kick ass. #WAR

  • Eatmegop

    so what’s your point?

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       If confused, read again.

  • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne


    • O P


  • Pingback: Anonymous()

  • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

    jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus, jesus. see, now i’m bigoted against christians. leftists are dumb, and they lie, just like sandra fluke. liars. this whole post and most of the leftist responses prove it. don’t like the sunlight, you freakin cockroaches? too damned bad. WAR, you sniveling little bitches…

    • O P

       Now the Leftists are cockroaches.  The bile drips from your mouth.  You’ve lost already; you just don’t know it yet.  You’re like that crazed Japanese soldier they found lost on that island years after the end of WWII who thought he was still fighting the Allied powers. Shadow boxing.  Tilting at windmills.  We’re laughing at you, not with you.

  • Pingback: Who is Sandra Fluke Dating? A Rich Socialist Boyfriend Perhaps? » Jim Hunt News()

  • Lutipold

    A little help: Sandra Fluke’s testimony did not deal with “subsidizing” birth control. It was testimony given, on behalf of a personal friend, to raise awareness for women who used birth control pills for reasons other than pregnancy prevention, such as a remedy for ovarian cysts. She also did not call for government to provide free birth control. The entire debate revolves around whether the employer has a right to interfere with birth control being provided by privately obtained insurance plans. Calling her a “slut” or a “welfare queen” and stalking her boyfriend utterly distracts from the issue at hand. From a moderate perspective, it also makes you look insane and desperately foaming at the mouth.

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       From a moderate perspective

      Stop defining moderate down.

      And the re-reading of the media mutter trope doesn’t make it any more true.

      • Lutipold

        I identify as a moderate in social and economic policy. I don’t know what else to tell you, unless you care to define my ideology for me and define what a “moderate” ought to be. Do you classify any individual who is even the least bit critical of you as a “leftist”? 

        • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

          Interesting.  I identify as a moderate, as well.  I guess it all depends on your perspective, then.

          Of course, by moderate, I mean one who wants to have a body of law which strictly conforms to the letter of the Constitution.  By this definition, those like Justices Alito and Thomas are moderates, for example.

  • Lutipold

    I’m also a little amused by the fact that you clearly have no idea who Paul Volcker is and are trying to imply he is some sort of socialist extremist. Paul Volcker is an openly free-market neo-liberal who headed the Federal Reserve under Reagan and was a luminary of Margaret Thatcher’s. 

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       If you’re going to criticize something the report says, first find something the report says.

      • pasta65

        All I got out of the article was Jewdiddy Jew Jew Jew Liberal Jew diddy Jew and then they showed the Woody Allen clip and then  all I could think about was that old fart making sexy time with that 23 year old Chinese girl.


    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      hey, leftist, try reading. i called paul a keynesian. i didn’t call him a socialist. try and keep up if you’re gonna play with the big boys. otherwise i’ll just delete and block you for being stupid. my blog isn’t a free speech zone. it’s a war zone, punk. 

      • Lutipold

        You’re wrong again. Volcker is a self-described “practical monetarist”, in the vein of Milton Friedman, not some cookie-cutter Keynesian. You would know this if you knew what you were talking about but your rampant pursuit of ideology above all clouds how you parse the facts. Try learning something: http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2007/02/how_paul_volcke.html

        • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

          i don’t care what volcker calls himself, jr. here’s the definition of keynesian: “the advocacy of monetary and fiscal programs by government to increase employment and spending.” you’re welcome. bye. 

          • O P

             “I don’t care about facts!  All I care about is venting my rage!  Mom!  Where’s my Cheesy Poofs!”

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SLV74O6XGVQGQRMBCPA5LGQRHI P Gustafson

            You forgot WAR.

          • joe from Lowell

            here’s the definition of keynesian: “the advocacy of monetary and fiscal programs by government to increase employment and spending.”
            Um…no.  Sorry.  That is not the definition of Keynesian.  Or even of Keynesianism.  Although you can be forgiven for thinking that if you first heard the term three years ago from Rush Limbaugh.

            Keynesians love fiscal and monetary programs to increase employment and spending, except for those circumstances, which amount to about half the business cycle, when they favor the opposite.


      • pasta65

        I have been to war.

        This is merely civics for retards.

        Not the same thing. Not even close.

        • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

          you haven’t been anywhere. 

          • pasta65


            That is where you are wrong, nice job blocking me BTW. That
            is exactly what a chicken shit coward would do.

            I have indeed been to war you pathetic keyboard kommando. 1st
            Battalion 4th Marines in the house and you, my wannabe warrior, can kiss my
            grunt ass.

            Like I said blogging and combat is not the same thing.

            Not even close.

            I suggest you tone down your rhetoric and your delusions of
            Peckinpahian grandeur. You would look a lot less foolish.

          • O P

            Ladies and Gentlemen:  The “I know you are, but what am I” School of Rhetoric on display. 

            You’re pathetic.

      • lol

        “i have no idea what the word ‘imply’ means”–brooksbayne

        • joe from Lowell

          I do too!

          I gopt a lot of Cheetos dust imply mustache.  I gopt to comb ipt out epery day.

  • Lutipold

    Nice job deleting and purging my comments by the way. God forbid there be any dissenting opinion to the insane group-think surrounding this entire issue.

  • Pingback: Poor Sandra Fluke… She Wants You To Pay For Her $9/Month Birth Control As She Frolics in Spain & Pompeii | FavStocks()

  • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

    oh, i’m also a lover of bacon! therefore, i must be anti-semitic! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRGGGGGHHHH! RUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!! 

    hey, leftists, don’t even try to lecture me about anti-semitism. you are the goofs trying to hop the nearest flotilla to get weapons to israel’s enemy. yes, the palestinian leadership are still denying israel’s right to exist. but, that’s ok, as long as the word jew isn’t mentioned more than x number of times in a blog post. thanks for the textbook definition of non-sequitur, kids.

    you punks are hilarious! 

    • Yonatan

      לך לעזעזל, אתה חתיכת זבל מסריחה הזויה  … אני יהודי רפובליקני אשר  אוהב את ישראל ואני מודיע לך כאן ועכשיו: אתה  הינך פאקינג אנטישמי חתיכת זבל – נקודה, סוף פסוק. מילותיך לא היו מביישים את כותבי הפרוטוקולים של זקני ציון

      • O P

         You tell him, Yonatan!

      • http://twitter.com/DemocraticLuntz JacobAlperin-Sheriff

        Rough translation: “Go to hell, you piece of smelly garbage. I’m a Jewish Republican who loves Israel and I’m letting you know right here, right now: You’re a fucking anti-Semitic piece of trash. Period. End of story. Your words are reminiscent of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

        not a Republican, but the rest all works for me.

  • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

    and they’re still rolling in. lol.

  • Plorp

    The open secrets image/link provided shows data from 1990-2006.

    “Total for this search: $39,800″.

    So that would be 16 years of donations, starting 22 years ago, averaging about $2500/yr.
    The statement “Bill has also made nearly $90,000 in personal donations to Dems and their allies in the past 10 years” appears factually incorrect, at least based on the data provided.

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      yeah, he didn’t donate that much back in the day. much more heavily weighted in the last 10-12 years. hardly the biggest issue in the post. 

  • LA_CC

    This just cracks me up. I’m glad you guys are chasing this one down. So sinister. An actual contributor to the Dems – must be evil. (equivalent to Koch’s & surely Soros will pop in any day…) Dig, dig, dig.  One would think that just a few of you would actually watch the testimony to see for yourselves, but no. You’d rather take Rush’s word for it – or Fox’s – and then make a total fool of yourselves chasing down this society page drivel and exposing your ignorance on what the entire topic is about. 

    Haters gonna hate. We get that. It’s just getting less popular with normal people.

  • Jim O’Hara

    Wow, this is the lamest attempt to call someone a socialist I’ve ever seen!  This is like a parody of Beck!  Anyone interested is “social justice” is a socialist?  You know what, I bet they studied “social studies” in school too!  And probably the whole family has seen West Side Story, so they must subscribe to the theory that noted radical Biff offers to officer Krupke, that all his problems stem from a “social disease” and that he’s “depraved on accounta I’m deprived.”

  • http://gripernews.blogspot.com Wisco

    Keep milking this loser of an issue. Seriously, as a liberal, I urge you in the strongest terms possible to never stop talking about this. 

  • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

    pwned!!! WAR.

    • Xenos66

      ” pwned!!! WAR.”

      Some things just defy parody and ridicule.

      • O P

         He’s confusing his RPGs with politics.  It’s an easy mistake for someone who lives in his mother’s basement.

      • photo111

        I love when these wanna be macho right wing dickheads say WAR now. If there was an actual war this turd would wind up blowing his dick off before he made it out the front door. 

    • O P

       As an aside, Brooks Bayne, if you have to take to the comments section to defend your own brilliant piece of investigative character assassination, you’ve already lost.

    • O P

       So, per Ripoff Report, you’re a THIEF in addition to being a bigot.  Nice cred there, bucko.

  • Pingback: Anonymous()

  • Pingback: In True Liberal Media Bias Fashion: What They DON’T Tell You About Sandra Fluke. « Romanticpoet's Weblog()

  • @LilacSundayBlog

    I questioned why this article equated the subjects’ Jewishness with their radical leanings and I was dismissed as a Progressive, a Media Matters troll.

    You assume wrongly, I am a proud Conservative. The good work you did exposing Fluke’s radical associates will be completely lost due to article’s “Jew Jew did you see there’s a Jew over here” tone.

  • Mutrock

    Does anyone else see through this charade?

  • geraldshields

    This is a dumb story. If you want to critize someone, then do it. This story is not about attacking someone, but attacking their friends, family and relationships. Only scumbags would attack people who can’t defend themselves. That’s what Rush Limbaugh and the author of this crap of a story did and keep doing.

    • http://twitter.com/sevenlayercake Skyler

      So it’s okay for the left to investigate a guy who asked the President a question (Joe the Plumber) or make cruel jokes about Sarah Palin’s children, but it’s not okay to fight fire with fire? So the left can do it but the right should cower into their corner and just take it?

      Also according to the leftist rules of political discourse, they’re allowed to call everyone racists, bigots, homophobes, and whatever other epithets they see fit — but goodness forbid someone on the right tries to defend themselves against those insults.

      While your comment has good intentions, I’m sure you can understand why it’s hard for some people to just sit and accept these things.

      • http://twitter.com/cjohnson319 Clarence Johnson

        It’s possible none of those things are OK, and instead of taking the high road, you’ve decided to dive into the pigsty, mouth open, screaming LET’S GET SOME.

        • http://twitter.com/sevenlayercake Skyler

          My point is that the high road is impossible to take when the right (voters even more so than politicians) are constantly berated & attacked by the left with charged epithets that do not apply to the issues at hand. It’s hard to take the high road when you have Media Matters monitoring Dana Loesch’s husband’s tweets, attacking Joe the Plumber, and waging war on the average civilian on a daily basis — but you expect us to just sit and take it?

          • http://twitter.com/cjohnson319 Clarence Johnson

            My point is that the high road is impossible to take”

            Difficult and impossible are not the same thing.

            The high road is not impossible to take, it’s just that folks are refusing to do it.

            “They do it too” was not an excuse your mother accepted when you were ten and caught behaving in a way that brought shame to your family, and yet here we see it trotted out to defend vicious, highly questionable attacks like this one.

            The high road isn’t easy, but sometimes it’s worth the wheezing and sweating to get up there.

          • O P

             Wonderfully put, CJ

          • MichaelPerkins

            Not so, You are both douches, We will not take the high road as you would like, we took the high road for decades instead of punching you fuckers back. It has gotten us no less than the destruction of morals & values through a Media bias that wants to demoralize America so it’s ripe for Communism or dictatorship. Just because liberals are worthless agitators doesn’t mean that we have to rubber stamp it anymore. We are done accepting Liberal Lies & slander from MSM. We are mad as hell & you dicks are not gonna see us crawl away any more. It’s on & we are just gearing up for the hate. in short Fuck you loser, you chose the game. we will beat you at it.

          • http://twitter.com/sevenlayercake Skyler

            Well then can I trust you to encourage the left-wing to take the high road as well? I think you can understand that it’s frustrating for the right to be told to shape up while the left does not hold its own accountable for similar attacks.

  • Michaelseanhof

    Impeccable detail. Keep pulling the masks from these people.

  • Pingback: The American Spectator : The Spectacle Blog : The Day Ahead: Thursday March 15()

  • Shades1470

    If it walks like a slut and it talks like a slut and holy cow, makes it with that guy, well its got to be a Democrat.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6LFDKITAQAYOCAD2G5IYC42CKA smarmy

    Why would two gays of the opposite sex even date each other? 

    • spepper

      Just ask Bill or Hillary.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HZDBYT2NJJAS3VXE4MUF2P6A5Y Tommy, tho people usually call

    Wow. The definition of ad hominem … 

  • TF

    Is this satire?

  • http://twitter.com/cjohnson319 Clarence Johnson

    FRED MALEK’S GHOST! 14 instances of “Jew” in a “political” article.

  • Pingback: I'm Boinking Sandra Fluke - ScrollPost.com()

  • Amused

    Oh my. I really wondered what the big fuss was about, but now I see it’s just about  a bunch of red state heads in the ground cun-surv-o-teevs who want to make sure they control everything about other people so that they can feel better about themselves. Lots of hate here, people, but like the kids say these days, haters gonna hate.

    I stopped reading at the woodie allen bit, when the “author” of this piece showed his own lack of understanding by including the line about “being reduced a cultural stereotype.” That shows he doesn’t understand it, or else he wouldn’t have included that line (if the righties among you don’t get it, that wouldn’t surprise me, but I’ll leave you to try to figure it out on your own. My guess is you can’t).

    You realize you guys are losing, right? All of this mysogenistic hate, all of these attempts to demean and belittle, to name-call without any plan of your own other than to denigrate others, you’re losing. I can’t wait for the general election. You’re going to get hosed, big-time. I just hope you idiots manage to give Santorum the nomination so that Obama can slam dunk the thing before it even begins. Please, please, please keep hating on the women. It’s the best thing you can do to finally drive this country back to a reasonable middle (instead of this conservative, reactionary thing we’ve started to become ever since that actor became president).

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1229872440 Brian Assanowicz

      “cun-surv-o-teevs who want to make sure they control everything about other people ”    Right, we’re the boogie men.  Do you believe this drivel you have been indoctrinated with, or is it just a natural reaction?  Libertarian Conservatives such as myself want to be left alone, and do not meddle in others lives.  By contrast, they only thing Progressives and Democrats are Pro Choice on in Abortion.  Everything else is to be banned, controlled, and regulated.  From my ATV, to my guns, to my income/property…you guys always seem to be stripping my rights without remorse.
      ” All of this mysogenistic hate, all of these attempts to demean and belittle, to name-call without any plan of your own other than to denigrate others”    Again right.  You clownshoes wrote the damn book on hate speech, demeaning, and belittling peoples of differing belief systems.  Anytime someone shines a light on your agenda with factual information…its is right to Rule 13 in Rules for Radicals for you.  But the ends justify the means, correct?  Still waiting for one of you internet heroes to call me a Teabagger to my face on the street.

      “It’s the best thing you can do to finally drive this country back to a reasonable middle (instead of this conservative, reactionary thing we’ve started to become ever since that actor became president). ”   First off. the “reasonable middle” has shifted to the left through political correctness and indoctrination that even the founding fathers are now considered extremists.  One way bipartisanship and crony capitalism has assisted with this view.  It also helps your view, that many of us are silent…because we are usually too busy producing, and spending time with family, rather than being politically active.  But know this.  We are awake.  We will be at the polls both voting, and volunteering as poll watchers and other election functions.  And your guy isnt a “nobody with a catchy election slogan” anymore.  He has a history now…and we will exploit it.

      • O P

         “Libertarian Conservatives such as myself” — oh, barf.  Libertarianism is the Dungeons and Dragons of political philosophies:  a fantasy world where nerds can become super heroes. 

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1229872440 Brian Assanowicz

          So you are for control and central planning nanny state.  Awesome

          • O P

             Not particularly — but I am certainly in favor of not letting rigid ideology dictate how we govern ourselves.  There is a proper place for government somewhere between total state control and anarchy.  But relying on silly, juvenile shibboleths like “the less government, the better” will never allow us to determine what that place is.  I’ve been to places where there is virtually no government regulation of industry, building, etc.  Let me tell you:  It’s not pretty.  It’s not a place where we would want to live. 

          • Stevonidas

            We aren’t discussing industrial or commercial regulation, we’re talking about government meddling in our personal matters.

            If Miss Fluke wishes to sleep around, that’s her business. Just don’t expect me to pay for her condoms, STD tests, etc.

          • O P

             Boy, you people just can’t stay on topic. You have this compulsion to rail against women by calling them sluts.  You’ve got mommy issues.

          • DevilsPrinciple

            Fluke isn’t a slut? Who knew ?…lol

          • O P

             Thanks for proving my point.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1229872440 Brian Assanowicz

            Yeah me too..Kosovo, Iraq, and Afghanistan.  And you misread where I am coming from.  I am not for anarchy, but a Constitutional government that meddles less in the peoples lives.  I want my rights upheld.  I am sick and tired of a minority pushing agendas which strip natural rights, and steal more money and liberty from the populace.  I dont think government should be involved in much of what it presently has a grasp on, and neglects and/or picks and chooses to enforce laws already on the books.

          • DevilsPrinciple

            you are really a reactionary and don’t believe in the Constitution or
            the Bill of Rights?

            say ”   but
            I am certainly in favor of not letting rigid ideology dictate how we
            govern ourselves.  There is a proper place for government
            somewhere between total state control and anarchy.  But relying
            on silly, juvenile shibboleths like “the less government, the
            better” will never allow us to determine what that place is. ” 

             you’ve described above  is pretty much a rigid ,
            closed minded  ideological statement.  Really what YOU are
            doing like most liberals is placing emotional labels on things that,
            well, frankly. don’t mean much. Leftists are not civilized. By that
            they deem bigger is better. More control is better. But civilization
            and being civilized is not that. Civilization is  a
            human society that has highly developed material and spiritual  (
            read religious)resources and a complex cultural, political, and legal
            organization; an advanced state in social development.

            Founding Fathers were civilized men who took the concept and
            furthered it with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. All of
            these things are counter intuitive to you and people of your ilk.The
            Founding Fathers didn’t seem to think smaller government  was
            silly. Why is it that you do ? Oh that’s right, they were silly and
            juvenile men who created a document protecting your right to be an
            idiot without getting your sorry ass shot off for being one.

            for playing….lol…

          • jsolbakken

             ” but I am certainly in favor of not letting rigid ideology dictate how we govern ourselves.”
            Wow! That’s your response to libertarianism? I didn’t think a human being could be that stupid!!!
            Libertarianism is the extreme repudiation of rigid ideologies that dictate to people, dumbass. It is guys like YOU who dictate to the rest of us “how we govern ourselves.” Sheesh!!!!

      • DevilsPrinciple

        Hate never begot anything except more hate. Hate won’t drive this country back to the middle. It’s already there. What’s really happening is the lefts ignorance is driving them out of the narrative. And they don’t like it. 

    • Dayna

      Too bad you stopped reading, because if you’d kept going you would have seen the author clearly demonstrating that the Mutterperls embody the “cultural stereotype”, from start to finish. Kind of a little wink-wink moment, you see. But I dunno . . . sometimes irony seems to be lost on lefties.

      And you’re welcome to keep on with the ridiculous “war on women” narrative (by the way, have you looked into women’s rights issues in the middle east? THERE’S a war on women, for you). The narrative is a giant red herring, designed to distract us from the fact that our government wants the power to force private institutions to pay for something that’s in direct violation of their religious mandates. If you don’t mind being part of the erosion of personal and religious liberties, if you’re happy to contribute to the (Democrat) administration’s attempts to, how did you put it, “control everything about other people” so you can feel better about yourself, well then, go right ahead and continue on this path. But one of these days you’ll wake up and realize that your own personal liberties went right out the window with everyone else’s. 

      In all sincerity, I recommend you find some people who identify as conservative (they’re all around you!) and ask them what they believe and why they believe it. Is there a chance you’ll run into name-calling? Sure, because human beings, regardless of side-of-aisle, are prone to that. Kind of like when you followed up your sentence about demeaning, belittling, name-calling, and denigrating by immediately labeling all conservatives “idiots”. Bullies come in all political stripes. But if you sincerely try to engage some thoughtful, articulate conservatives (again, they’re all around you!) in conversation, you might be surprised to discover how wildly skewed the public portrayal of us has been. 

      • DevilsPrinciple

        Excellent post, Dayna!

    • DevilsPrinciple

      I bet you haven’t checked out the little meeting the NAACP is having with the UN over voter rights ID issues…lol..I wonder how Sharpton and Jackson got passports without ID…lol..oh well.those silly leftinistas..same as they ever were…

  • Jimmiller

    The fact that Bill Mutterperl wears a red hat needs to be emphasized more.

    • Sheik_Yerbouti_207

      They clearly used photshop to remove the scythe and hammer.

      • Xenos66

        Isn’t it just an update of a phrygian cap?  Better watch out for any female Mutterperls with an obsessive knitting habit!

        Aux barricades!  Guerre!

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne



      • Jimmiller

        No, I mean that seriously.  That choice of color isn’t something done casually.

  • O P

     As with all Brietbart-tainted nonsense, this article refuses to address the substance of what Sandra Fluke was talking about and, instead, engages in ad hominem non sequiturs in order to denigrate the author’s ideological opponent. 

    THIS is why you people are losing.  This is why you have as your champions such intellectual lightweights as Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Michelle Malkin, et al.  This is why your party is the laughing stock of, oh, let’s say THE ENTIRE WORLD.  The modern Right Wing is bereft of ideas.  It looks back on rubble that resulted from the Bush administration and, unable to come to grasp the devastation that its dear world view wrought, simply starts to lash out at any available target that lies to the right of Sen. James Inhofe (another example of Republican brilliance on display).

    Once more for the simple minded among us:  Sandra Fluke wasn’t asking for the government to pay for her contraception; she was providing a clear, cogent (two adjectives I would NOT use to describe your diatribe) case why insurance companies should be mandated to cover contraception.  Can you comprehend the difference?  Or are you so blinkered by manufactured rage at the president and all he stands for that such menial distinctions are not worth noting?

    Investigative research is only worthwhile if it actually sheds light on some otherwise covert topic.  This fails in that regard.  Oooh — so a left-leaning female Democrat law student is dating someone who probably largely shares her opinions on matters?!  Color me shocked.  Whom should she date?  James O’Keefe (another product of your departed-liege’s school of vicious, irrelevant, slash-and-burn “jhournalism”)?

    Give us all a break.  Outside of your tight little coterie, people think you’re a bunch of jerks. 

    America NEEDS to have two, well-balanced, thoughtful sides to the political spectrum.  The insanity currently on the right denies our country that opportunity.  When will someone with some brains (and decency) emerge to provide an intelligent voice on the right?

    Any response to this that fails to address the substance of what Fluke spoke about fails.  But you know that already, and it doesn’t stop you.  Begin the personal attacks in 5 4 3 2 . . .

    • Amor

      or maybe just a bewildering declaration “WAR” by the author.

      It’s so strange how the author makes so much effort to point out the Jewishness of his target, and specifically his attempts to conflate that with Marxist thought. Marx was Jewish, so what is the author’s point? The whole article is very evocative of anti-Semitic liturature. There was pretty much no reason to write like this unless you buy into Jewish-Marxist conspiracy tropes.

      And about the rest of the article, well, I won’t even bother. I hope the author doesn’t get Paid for this.

    • Dayna

      She was asking a Catholic institution to pay their insurance providers to cover contraception. She was asking Catholics to pay for contraception. There is some indication that rather than seeking out a school more in line with her own personal belief system, she went to Georgetown with the specific intent of fighting their policies. That would be like a vegan going to dinner at the local steakhouse with the express purpose of getting all up in arms when they don’t offer much in the way of vegan meal options. I’m sorry, but this isn’t a war on women, it’s a war on religious liberties. And it’s not as though she is without access to any birth control options; she can waltz into her nearest Planned Parenthood, and if she qualifies financially, chances are pretty good she’ll be able to waltz out with free contraception. 

      This is an orchestrated narrative. The opening shot was in the Jan 7 GOP debate, when George Stephanopouls asked, “Governor Romney, do you believe that states have the right to ban contraception?” Romney shrewdly refused to take the bait, because that was an absolutely ridiculous question, but the narrative continued from there, and unfortunately Rush Limbaugh gave it just the shot it needed to launch it to national media prominence. Despite the brouhaha, NO ONE is asking for contraception to be banned! NO ONE is trying to restrict access to contraception! This trumped-up “war on women” is a disgrace to the intelligent, successful women of this nation, especially at a time when the basic freedoms of women in many parts of the middle east are in such a state.   

      As to why this article is appropriate, when someone is an active part of a political agenda (“outrage” and all), it is reasonable that journalists should vet who they are, where they come from, and with whom they surround themselves. It is right that agendas should be transparent. If they are not, it is right that journalists should help them become so.

      • joe from Lowell

        This is an orchestrated narrative.
        No, your side is just losing, because you’ve staked out an extremist position.  When you trip over your own feet and fall in the mud, it’s not a conspiracy among the mud, gravity, and your sneakers.

        when someone is an active part of a political agenda (“outrage” and all), it is reasonable that journalists should vet who they are, where they come from, and with whom they surround themselves

        You know, Jews.

        • Dayna

          I fail to see how opposing the government’s ability to force private institutions to pay for something in violation of their religious mandates qualifies as “extreme”. I’m talking about the obviously orchestrated narrative that’s turning a very appropriate discussion on the powers of the federal government to trump religious mandates into a very out-of-left-field discussion about an imaginary war on women. 

          The author’s over-the-top harping on the Jewish origins of the Mutterperl family doesn’t change the fact that they are a well-connected, influential, and wealthy presence in the progressive movement. Sandra Fluke is very welcome to have her 1st Amendment-protected say, and anyone who cares to is welcome to put her message in the proper context. Nancy Pelosi wanted to present her as a typical young college student (just like many of us were, once upon a time), simply trying to get her education and pay the bills. Instead, she is a 30-year-old activist who chose to go to Georgetown specifically to try to change their policies, and ultimately has her sights set on requiring insurance to pay for gender-reassignment surgery. I would say, objectively, that qualifies as an agenda. I’m not the least bit interested in the religious or ethnic heritages of the people with whom she associates; I am extremely interested in the political persuasions and connections of the people with whom she associates. 

          • Ran

            Because Georgetown is not paying for her insurance. Georgetown is merely the conduit.

        • DevilsPrinciple

          It’s amusing when people like Joe  project their ” faux outrage against Jews schtick ” on others . This one must have hit particularly close to home.

          I’m surprised Joe hasn’t sued his brain for non~support : – )

      • Lara

         Dayna, I hope you don’t mind if I copy and paste your response for future use–you have distilled the argument so succinctly.  I have lost so much faith in politics/mankind/average intelligence as we go on and on with this manufactured “war on women” and “they’re forbidding contraception!” drivel.  It has always been about religious freedom–and the left have no respect for that one.


      Thru this whole look how smart I think I am post  it just cracks me up that someone as smart as you think you are thinks that the government has the power to mandate any private industry to supply anybody anything .There is no substance to what Ms.Fluke has to say just a bunch of self indulging drivel in the same manner as this post.I really like how the first 2-3 paragraphs go on&on just insulting any one who does not think like you do only to end by” begin the personal attacks “.Sorry to dissapoint but this post does more to prove how hypicritical and lacking of any kind of rational a person can have then anything I could say .Of course you had to throw in the tried and true “Bush destroyed this country”mantra just to show us all just how deep you really are .The best part with post such as this ,it proves the point if you let ignorant people speak long enough ,they will always prove just how ignorant they truly are .

  • Argaman

    Great to see Jews blamed for being both socialists & rich! Way to go! Have you been reading the Protocols of the Elders of Zion for column ideas lately?

  • Pingback: A look at Sandra Fluke’s extravagant lifestyle | Twitchy()

  • http://www.facebook.com/sally.lightman Sally Lightman

    Too bad this dude could not afford his own rubbers…if he could, Fluke would never have had her 15 minutes of fame.

  • joe from Lowell

    the typical Jewish variant of socialism. 
    Nice line, freak.I see the right hasn’t changed since the 30s.

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      yes, there are other variants of socialism. the mutterperls just happen to be of the typical jewish variant, as the piece aptly demonstrates. 

  • Hitler

    cool anti semetic article you have here, the graph

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1229872440 Brian Assanowicz

    Wow…theres just too much here to even begin to argue with.  All this coming form a guy that supports a Central Planning nanny state.  One to control, regulate, ban, and bully.  Wow.

    The only reason Constitutional Libertarians such as myself are “right wing” is because you on the left have successfully moved the goal posts of what a “Moderate” is to the left!  Dont think we dont recognize that you have successfully co-opted academia and the media.  We understand that for 30 years political correctness and progressive indoctrination has lulled the people into a false sense of security.  Dumbed down with mindless entertainment and instant gratification.  

    We are “reactionary” only in that we take a lot of crap and are too busy producing rather than taking.  We tend to stay to ourselves and our families, and out of other peoples lives.  But you guys just took the 2008 election and the complete control of government and started sprinting toward the Progressive endzone, instead of the creeping encroachment that worked so well for you the past decades.  You didnt expect pushback?   We will see what happens this November.  I can tell you this…unlike 2008, we will be out there in force, with cameras.  Poll watching, and protecting the process.  

    • O P

       Ayn Rand was a failed movie star and screenwriter who decided to take out her anger at being born ugly on everyone who didn’t agree with her. 

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

         Alas, now we have NOW, so women born ugly have a place where their money is wanted.

  • Pingback:   Sandra Fluck with 1 percenter “Boy Friend” in Europe? by Macsmind – Politics, Culture and Breaking News and the 2012 Presidential Election!()

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LRTTUEPQB2UHVK3CUPDCIGUTKQ Nancy


    • Guest

       So are YOU paying for her PRIVATE insurance? NO. You are not. So shut up and learn to listen to facts.

      • dominoe4

        Actually,we all will be, as more and more ‘conditions’ such as contraception, which any idiot can buy at the local store, and ‘trans-gendered’ operations are added to the list of necessary medical coverage, premiums for all will rise. You geniuses on the left just can’t seem to comprehend this.

        • DizzyMissL

          Thank God someone gets it dominoe.

  • Eam0061

    Mr. Bayne, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1708720 Greg Kastelman

    This is like reading a rant from a paranoid schizophrenic. May want to check with your local psychiatrist . . . 

    O wait, my bad. Psychiatry is only for the 1%, liberal socialists who dream about making the “real America” pay for their condoms.

  • Jeremiah

    Cc this to the Kristols, the Adelsons, the Kagans, and to Cantoand while you are at it guys like Kudlow and Greenspan who think that because they take communion or whatever their republican friends like them more. Bottom line– these guys don’t like Jews they respect our intellect,work ethic, and business sense, but otherwise they do not like us.

  • O P

    Marxism actually had a good term for people like Brooks Bayne:  Useful idiot.

    • O P

       I love how he ‘liked’ his own article.  Almost as pathetic as needing to take to the comments section to attack his critics.

  • http://twitter.com/chrish43 chrish43

    Left! Right! Left! Right! Both sides sound like a bunch of goose stepping Nazis to me! BOTH sides want control of the American people! BOTH sides need to BACK OFF!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LLYWASUHZ45VU6UHXVLFHBTUMU MoeLarryAndJesus

    Was this garbage crossposted at Stormfront?

  • Sheik_Yerbouti_207

    This article follows the basic formula of practically everything else seen on TP blogs:
    1. Find something or someone we don’t like.
    2. Use loosely connected facts, here-say, speculation and/or opinion to propose a conspiracy.
    3. Generously apply words with strong negative feelings among fellow mouth-breathers.
    5. Include undertones of racism, antisemitism, sexism, fear and/or paranoia.
    4. Wait for page clicks and checks from advertisers to roll in. Chu-ching!

    Be sure to avoid the following:
    – Search for truth
    – Critical thinking

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R3MUJEJ2PA7HRH6FRUSLPZVUCY Cmm912

      Yo Sheik,
      What’s “loose” in this commentary?  What’s “hear-say” (NOT “here-say” as you wrote) in this commentary?  What’s “speculation” in this commentary?
      Please, please, please point out the “racism” in his commentary.  I must be too stupid to recognize it; enlighten me.

      Also, FYI, merely pointing out or writing that someone is Jewish does NOT make one an anti-semite.  That is about as stupid as you calling someone a “racist” because they used the word “African-American” or “black” in a conversation describing someone who IS African-American or black!
      BACK-UP your condemnations and accusations!

      Lastly, this commentary does nothing BUT search for the truth.  Actually, this commentary FOUND the truth!  SPOT-ON!  Down to the connections to the obama administration.

  • Right Nutz

    Wow.  You’re a bigot and a complete idiot.  Thanks for sharing!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/BDYXXMV44GTCHXAEWFLKI6UELQ Ryan

    This is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read, and the “author” comments here prove he’s a complete moron. WAR! Derp derp derp.

  • http://ok-cleek.com/blogs cleek

    given: a woman’s boyfriend is Jewish.

    thus: birth control should not be covered by health insurance.


  • Dsmaxsucks

    Shouldn’t jew-hating retard be one of your tags?  Or we can’t call you retards anymore cuz Saint Sarah the Protestant says you gap teethed freaks won’t stop crying until we tell you that you are indeed special and give you a trophy.  Thank God you folks don’t get laid as it slows your reproduction, but do you have to fucking whine about it so much?  Its like a thing with you descendants of National Socialism… “I’m a dick, why does everyone hate me?”

    • http://www.facebook.com/johny.appleseed2 Johny Appleseed

      I’m a born again Christian and I would lay down my life for the State of Israel and it
      seems to me at least that Obama is more anti Israel than any evangelical Christian
      I ever talked to.

      • http://twitter.com/DemocraticLuntz JacobAlperin-Sheriff

        Go join Tzahal then and IY”H you’ll get your chance.

  • http://twitter.com/Easyridersf Easy Rider

    “However, as soon as I heard his name in a story about Sandra Fluke, I almost choked, due to my sudden epiphany. Why? Because anyone familiar with Boston and New York political history knows about the wealthy Mutterperl family’s long tradition of supporting the typical Jewish variant of socialism.” Wow. You should have choked. For the good of humanity. You are an awful person.

  • JohnE

    The screenshot of the tweet is fake.  Twitter does not place the “Follow” button under the image:  it does not place function icons on the right-hand side.  That renders the following moot: the account does not exist.

  • Timleary_20016

    My goodness, you are despicable.  Have you no shame?

  • Mark57

    At first i thought the article was Anti Jewish after reading it I’m not really sure.Brandies might have originated as a Jewish University but now it’s a hot bed of anti Israel activism.Second the JFNA is a leftist bunch who gives donations to anti Israel media matters as well as to Muslim groups. So as much as the article  can be mistaken for Anti Jewish,i think it’s more anti leftists.

    • Mark57

       BTW I’m Jewish and this is from a Jewish Blog. It’s about Jewish Groups that give to anti Jewish Organizations      http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2012/02/is-your-jewish-federation-money-funding.html

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

        Mark57, have you gotten any sort of communication from JacobAlperin-Sheriff?  A message asking where you daven, perhaps?  He appears to be of the opinion, that some Jews who are skeptical of the accusations of antisemitism in this article, are not really Jews.

  • ppjeffy

    Hey Brooks…looks like you are a little scam artist. We can do some digging too.

    • O P
      • O P


        • O P


    • photo111

      No wonder they defend Wall Street.

    • O P


  • Whenyougrowupyouwanttobe7

    A screed, smearing loose associations driven by a hateful mind.

  • photo111

    About time right wing fuckheads trotted out Jewish stereotypes from Der Sturmer. At least they’re consistent. Please, go on…do the mutterperls eat children too? 

    • dominoe4

      Do Jews eat children? Ask the left’s #Occupy..they are, after-all, leading America in anti-Semitism at this point.

      • photo111

        In Der Sturmer Jews were charaterized as eating children. 

        Being critical of Israeli policy toward the Palestinians isnt anti-semetism asshat. FYI: the Palestinians are semetic people too. 

        What is antisemetism and a hallmark of the right since the 30’s is slandering Jews as secretly controlling things which is what this article is doing.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_P5UBGJVCZYZR4LW73FWNSDMULM Always Learning

    Proof Sandra and boyfriend shouldn’t breed up offspring.  End liberalism now.  Free raincoats for all liberals!  Free birth control pills for Sandra!  Don’t let her and him make the same mistake their parents did!

  • Tendernob

    Wow.  A rant that succeeds in being both Anti-Semitic and an utterly childish waste of time. The world will TOTALLY care now that you’ve exposed some law student’s vacation photos. Well done, wingnut!

  • Neil Goldin-Schauer

    This article seems poorly written, or maybe it lost something in translation from the original German.

  • JohnE

    I stand corrected There is a twitter account@AdamMutterperl . It belongs to a “comedy writer” .  He works for Maker Studios in Culver City, CA (real close Georgetown Univ – sarcasm).  Since his Twitter account is “Protected”: you can’t see his tweets unless he accepts you as a follower.  But, to reiterate, the “screenshot” of his tweet is not in proper Twitter format.  So, that “screenshot” is a lie.

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      no, it was taken BEFORE he made his account private. 

  • Stu Koblentz

    Wow dude.  Its one thing to be thought a white supremacist.  Its something else to put it in writing and by publishing it confirming to the whole wide world that you are exactly that.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R3MUJEJ2PA7HRH6FRUSLPZVUCY Cmm912

      Dear Stu,

      I find it frightening how ignorant (and racist) the Left posting here truly are.  Every one of you view life through a racial prism!  How very sad for you.  Some of you here reference “critical thinking” but none of you practice it.  You cannot practice critical thinking when you view the world, and all of the people inhabiting it, as racists!

      • O P

         So disingenuous.  The thief, liar and bigot Brooks Bayne could have written the whole article WITHOUT mentioning that Fluke’s boyfriend’s family was Jewish.  Yet he chose not just to mention it, but to make it the centerpiece.  Don’t be a idiot.

      • jsolbakken

         “You cannot practice critical thinking when you view the world, and all of the people inhabiting it, as racists!” Who cares about critical thinking when there is a world to win!!!

  • Vindel

    “Yet, we’re supposed to believe that this just boils down to a poor girl needing us to “subsidize” her birth control”

    Wait, what? She wants the private insurance she pays for through GWU to offer it. She didn’t say diddly about taxpayers paying for contraceptives through PRIVATE insurance.

    • DizzyMissL

      Um, taxpayers will subsidize it under Obamacare.

    • dominoe4

      Actually, it’s about a woman that had the rare luxury to choose a religious school for the specific purpose of rallying against it’s policy. Actually, it’s about the government’s over-reach in violating the beliefs of a religious faith for their own un-Constitutional mandates. Actually, it’s about a woman whining about ‘inaccessible’ and ‘unaffordable’ contraceptives that any idiot with a few bucks can buy almost anywhere, yet she can afford to tour Europe (especially, at a time, 2011, when most people are suffering financially). Excuse me if I don’t break out the violin. And actually, the more bogus costs that must be added to health-care coverage, such as ‘contraception’ or ‘transgendered’ operations, the more we will ALL pay for PRIVATE coverage. That is…if PRIVATE coverage will even be a reality under the illegal, un-Constitutional Obumblercare. Hope that clears it up for you, genius.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/4HK52I2GSNJDQSYHBGUQX4FH5E Nora

    also too….WAR!

    The combination of bravado and total lack of self-awareness is just precious.

  • salvage salvage

     Ha! Ha! Idiots.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ty-Emzone/100001320366182 Ty Emzone

    Wait … this site is not spoof?  This horse manure is not really just The Onion(tm)?

    OMG LOL.  What a hoot outfit. 

  • PWL

    You’re really sad, you know that?

     You’re fighting a battle that ended way long ago, when Joe McCarthy died. You remind of Don Quixote tilting at windmills, thinking they were giants.

    Grow up and stop living in the Fifties, you sad misogynistic twerp.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=624238756 Lloyd Lachow


  • Leostein

    Keep defaming private individuals, moron.  You forgot to add another section to your website profile:  Hateful and Despicable. 

  • Plewis1956

    So the takeaway is that all these people are Jews of some kind. Got it.

  • Del2124

    Um, it’s not about her birth control. Fluke was talking about women’s birth control. Sure, some women are rich and well-connected, most aren’t. Also, it’s not a government subsidiary, it’s insurance coverage, which people who have insurance pay for through their insurance policy. 

    • DizzyMissL

      Well, she did not pay for it via her insurance because IT WAS NOT COVERED.

  • Lisa

    Oh Sandra, he’s cute! Nice family to boot!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1101784340 David Rodden

    Give her birth control…or give her babies with this person…Give her birth control…

  • TanzbodenKoenig

    You know who else thought that Jews were conspiratorial socialists with plans for world domination?

    • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

      you mean the bolsheviks? yes, patton. look how that turned out. nearly a 50 year cold war, AND almost an actual NUCLEAR war during the cuban missile crisis. any more history you’d like to learn?

      • http://twitter.com/DemocraticLuntz JacobAlperin-Sheriff

        Nice try, but the Bolveshiks were themselves (Soviet) socialists; they thought the Jews were capitalists with plans for world domination.

        The correct answers: the Czarists, the Nazis, the rest of the Tea Party. 

        • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

          you leftists just don’t do enough reading. collectivist history is my forte. here’s something to make your head explode (rhetorically speaking, of course): http://www.marxists.org/archive/weisbord/Ignorance.htm

          behold! another jr kos writer pwned! bye, jr.

        • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

           Maybe I’ll daven at the next Tea Party gathering.

        • Sumner_Vengeance

          I am Jewish and Tea Party. You are a jino and likely a communist, or at least a commie-symp whining socialist.

          (And your hat-thief blog shows you all over the “progressive” reservation (everyone knows “progressive” is code for FAR LEFT, PALIN-OBSESSED FOOL).YOUR “president” is destroying America’s economy and helping the enemies of Israel.Why don’t you convert out already? You are already lying to God every time you say “Next year in Jerusalem” as you support every candidate / issue WHO WANTS TO CUT IT IN HALF AND GIVE IT THE MUSLIMS.

          Join the jihadis. They LOVE YOU.

  • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

    more leftist ad hominem attacks. see how they don’t address facts. sandra’s a shill, not some “poor co-ed”. and she’s connected to a socialist family (who also happen to be of the jewish variety of socialists, there are other varieties), with direct ties to the obama administration. this whole sandra fluke thing was orchestrated. the left knows it. that’s why the leftist spambots are comment-bombing this piece. it’s awesome. bring it! WAR.

    • TanzbodenKoenig

      Or, more likely – she is a well spoken and ambitious young woman who sees a double standard in our supposedly top notch medical system and would like to rectify it without being called a whore for advocating for equal rights.  If ED medicines are covered by insurance when they have absolutely no medical benefits besides gettin and maintaining an erection which would only be useful for sexual gratification, while BC, which is prescribed for ACTUAL medical conditions ranging from somthing minor like heavy periods or something potentially life/fertility threatening like ovarian cysts or endometriosis, is not covered and has prohibitive annual costs, then she correctly perceives it as an affront to gender equality and not only has the right, but the moral obligation to rectify it.  Whether you have sex every day, once a year, or you’re a virgin – you still take BC daily (if you had ever had intimate knowledge of a woman I’m sure you would have grasped this basic concept) and many women’s lives or their future children’s lives would be at risk if they were denied access to it.  

      Yellow ‘journalists’ like yourself obfuscate the entire issue by completely re-writing the record and mixing your slut-shaming with good ‘ol Weimar right-wing jewbaiting because you know you have absolutely no footing on the facts of the debate.  BC is medically necessary, insurance should have to cover it as they would any other proven, safe and medically effective line of treatment, Ms. Fluke was not testifying on her behalf but instead that of her classmate with POS, and that she has withstood baseless and outright libelous attacks from you and your ilk with poise and dignity that any parent would be proud to see in their daughter.    Go back to flipping through your dog-eared copy of Protocols and keep your Jew hate to yourself, Adolf.

    • O P

       Good job summarizing your own article, Einstein.  You have yet to deal with the substance of her argument.  There are all sorts of connections and parallels that paranoid, deluded minds can draw.  Rather than taking on those imagined plots against — um, insurance companies, I guess, why don’t you enlighten all of us with something that is actually material.

    • O P

       You really are sad.  You simply remove the comments that don’t square with your worldview.  Pretty much sums up your ideological kin.  Edit edit edit.  Have fun in your ever-shrinking fantasy land — THIEF BIGOT LIAR.

    • http://twitter.com/DemocraticLuntz JacobAlperin-Sheriff

       “The Jewish variety of socialist …” הם לא גרים בקבוצה …

      • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

        sup, daily kos and huffpoo sycophant? see the information above. especially that link about the new bedford jewish community. the truth is right there, but you have to be able to see it. 

        • http://twitter.com/DemocraticLuntz JacobAlperin-Sheriff

          I know, those money-grubbing socialist New Bedford Jews are taking up land from G-d-fearing Christian capitalists.

          • http://brooksbayne.com brooksbayne

            correction: new bedford socialist jews. would you prefer socialist? or are you offended by “new bedford”? who created marxism? some pentecostal? you kids hate looking the truth in the eye, ESPECIALLY when said truth destroys your sandra fluke “poor co-ed needs obamacare to demolish the establishment clause… because we don’t like christian religious institutions” meme. tell me why issa held his hearing. now tell me what sandra fluke “testified” in front of. you won’t. you’ll respond with ad hominem, or dissemble. run along, jr., the adults have work to do. 

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

        I suppose it’s better to just say all Jews are socialists, right?  Oh wait, that would be antisemitic, too.

        I gave up on the ADL definition of what constitutes antisemitism: specifically, that any opinion in opposition to the left, which tangentially effects or refers to Jews in any way, is antisemitic.

      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater


      • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

        I suppose it’s better to just say all Jews are socialists, right? Oh wait, that would be antisemitic, too. I mean, really antisemitic, not your brand.

        I gave up on the ADL definition of what constitutes antisemitism: specifically, that any opinion in opposition to the left, which tangentially effects or refers to Jews in any way, is antisemitic.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SLV74O6XGVQGQRMBCPA5LGQRHI P Gustafson

    I’d bet Bill got more trim than you’ve ever seen. Hillary, who knows?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SLV74O6XGVQGQRMBCPA5LGQRHI P Gustafson

    Wow, I’m glad you stopped short of calling leftists poopyheads.

  • O P

    Brooks Bayne, 11271 Ventura Blvd #221, Studio City CA 91604 Tel: 615-668-3744

  • Pingback: Welfare Queen, Sandra Fluke, Frolics In Spain and Italy « Nice Deb()

  • midwest norwegian

    So, can we call it “self-hatred”  and “self-loathing” when these same Jews are in bed with an administration as anti-Israel as Obama’s?  


  • Pingback: Moonbattery » Sandra Fluke’s Recreational Sex Partner()

  • Pingback: Rush Limbaugh To Be Prosecuted? - Page 37 - Christian Forums()

  • Pingback: Hey, What Do You Know? Sandra Fluke’s Boyfriend is a Rich Socialist | The Lonely Conservative()

  • Pingback: Welfare Queen, Sandra Fluke, Frolics In Spain and Italy | FavStocks()

  • Pingback: Here‘s Sandra Fluke’s alleged boyfriend | FavStocks()

  • Pingback: » Sandra Fluke’s Boyfriend, Adam “Cutie Pants” Mutterperl, And His Radical Socialist Family dé Garay.com()

  • Russ

    Funny thing I haven’t heard from the seperation of Church and State crowd on this issue. Everytime it is discovered that some small town has put up a manger scene on the courthouse lawn or placed a cross at a war memorial this crowd goes nuts and yet when Government tries to take over a Church we don’t hear a peep.    

  • Mark57

    I guess Brett Stephens of the WSJ is Anti Jewish as well the only problem? He’s Jewish and here’s an article about about Obama’s leftist Jewish friends   http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203458604577263382407488986.html

  • Pingback: What War Against Women? | Desperado's Outpost()

  • Pingback: Sandra (I Cant’ Afford Contraception) Fluke Dating Son of Wealthy Dem Donor « The Foxhole()

  • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

     Now you’ll have trolls doubting your woman-ness, just as I’ve had those doubting my Jewish-ness.  Identity politics, yah gotta love it.

  • Pingback: Here‘s Sandra Fluke’s alleged boyfriend | Nice Messages()

  • Obi-jonKenobi

    Poor rich girl, Sandra Fluke, didn’t stand up to ask us to pay for her PERSONAL health insurance to cover contraceptives, she was making a statement that it should be mandated that health insurance companies cover contraception.  She was trying to serve a greater good but I know that doesn’t support your deceptive meme.

    But, I’m sure you aren’t stupid enough NOT to know this, it’s just that you think the troglodytes that actually take the time to read your screeds are too stupid to figure that out.

  • Pingback: The War Against Christianity: Operation “Women’s Health” « Kingsjester's Blog()

  • Mark57

     An arm of the socialist JFNA the JCC was picketed by anti shariah protestors the other day                          http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/153830#.T2TgqHmDnUs

  • londondave

    Why’s the guy wearing a FULL BODY CONDOM?

    Is Fluke that contagious?

    • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

       Maybe that’s why her contraception is so expensive.

  • BenkaiDebussy

    It sounds like you haven’t held one either; all people are sinners in the eyes of God, and the fact that you’re choosing to focus on a victim-less sin pretty clearly shows that your reasons are personal and have nothing to do with the Bible. Not to mention the fact that the part of the Bible that condemns homosexuality also gives a bunch of other laws that I can guarantee you don’t support or abide by. 

    Also, how in the world do birth control pills encourage homosexuality? The person you replied to was only pointing out that they are often used for reasons other than birth control; her being a lesbian was only meant to show that she doesn’t need them for birth control. You’re either incredibly stupid or (more likely) you were scanning the comment for something to disagree with instead of actually reading.

    Either way, you’re a very dishonest person who doesn’t argue in good faith and uses religion to promote your own personal ideology.(I’m not Christian myself and homosexuality isn’t a sin, but you’re doing the same thing many other Christians do – selectively picking and choosing which parts of the Bible to use in order to support your own *personal* ideology.)

  • Pingback: One Leftist Singled Out | The Graph()

  • Mark57

    This is a great article on The Jewish Federation  it really has some good information on its extreme objectives    http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2012/03/anti-israel-groups-to-march-in-salute.html#links

  • dominoe4

    Actually, we know about this woman because it was a leftist lame attempt to divert the issue of government violating a religion’s faith through un-Constitutional mandates. BTW, you’re wrong on most counts..sorry..you have the typical liberal misconception of what the right is about, stereotypes are ridiculous. But your side thrives on them. The right is about, for starters, remaining true to the idea of America and the Constitution itself, the idea that government answers to The People..not the other way around. If the left weren’t so anti-American, so hateful towards everything it stands for..then we would get along. Alas, rather than move to any number of optional ‘Socialist Utopia’ states already in existence, you insist on fighting us here.  The right has always been the right, in essence. It is the left that attempt to undermine this Country..it is the left that has fallen far from the tree of history that has made this Country unique and free. THAT’s why we will never get along.

  • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

     I suspect that this kind of demagoguery, which seems to becoming a defining characteristic of the American left today, is due to being cornered politically.  The class warfare and racial tropes are losing their effectiveness; hence the doubling down with OWS (which is undeniably a Dem joint), and the dusting off of the Republican misogyny  myth.

  • http://twitter.com/KentAtwater Kent Atwater

    If that’s the sort of contraception we’re talking about, it’s $9 a month at Wal-Mart.  Two fewer lattes a month, and you’re good to … er … go.

    • rachelh72

      Not that easy.  Not all women can take generic $9 Walmart birth control.   We all react differently to it;  not all birth control is the same.    And keep in mind that it’s a prescription drug that still requires a doctor visit once a  year.   Also keep in mind that it’s *cheaper* for everybody else for allowing women to be able to control when and how many kids they have.   Birth, babies,  dependent kids til 18, add more burden to the system than women on birth control does. 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/EWH4IQVPA72T64Z3SYP4MZL6DM Campo

    All paid for with our taxes!!

  • carla5731

    I blame Sandra Fluke’s “$3000″ claim for the firestorm. I’ve lived the life of a broke young woman, in college and for several years after, and was able to manage my fertility without investing several thousand doallars in contraceptives. Fluke testified before Congress, and presumably on behalf of all women, that we can’t make it without the government mandating this coverage — and that’s a lie.

    Her statement also made me realize how the Democrats create an unnecessary dependence on public support with their policies. A safety net is one thing; but people who are capable of caring for themselves should accept that responsibility, and they shouldn’t be trying to pass laws infringe on the rights of people who are equally competent with managing personal decisions and want to live with less government interference.

  • Pingback: Sandra Fluke and Walmart | The American Catholic()

  • dominoe4

    Oh, I’m sure Obumblercare won’t cover transgender procedures…just like it won’t cover illegal aliens, there are no death panels, and it will reduce the deficit. I also have a trans-sexual Unicorn for sale that does a great Cher impersonation.

  • Pingback: The Federalist, The Eunuchorn, And War | The Graph()

  • Gopink1162012

    You are a disgusting piece of filth to say that about a great man’s death. Even though you’re a jerk-Andrew would have still treated you kindly. How low can one be to mock a great man who died so young leaving behind a beautiful wife & children. You probably were the one who made the fake Twitter account of Andrew’s widow.

  • Steve

    As a Jewish liberal, I’d like to sincerely thank you for writing this piece. You see, Republicans regularly wonder why Jews continue to vote for Democrats when the Republicans say they love Israel so much. The simple answer is that as a group, Jews aren’t dumb, have long memories and haven’t forgotten the history of anti-Semitic rhetoric that underlies much of the conservative movement.

    But over the years, mainstream Republicans have become better and better at hiding the Jew hatred, both historical and present day among the GOP base. (In fairness, I do believe America in general and Republicans specifically have become less genuinely anti-Semitic, but it’s certainly still there.) So Jews need a piece like this every once in a while to remind them that all rhetoric aside, there’s still some serious anti-Semitism lurking on the right, and it’s a foolish idea to hitch our wagon to a horse that wouldn’t hesitate to quickly kick us in the face, as has happened so many times before throughout Jewish history.

    (Yes, I know you’re not a Republican but rather a Constitutionalist, or whatever the hip thing is to say these days, but the audience to which you’re pandering is certainly voting heavily Republican.)

  • Pingback: If Brooks Bayne Is An Anti-Semite, I’ll Eat My Kippah | The Graph()

  • Pingback: My Savior Is A Jewish Carpenter: A Mea Culpa | The Graph()

  • Pingback: Update #2: Sandra Fluke’s Boyfriend, Adam “Cutie Pants” Mutterperl, And His Radical Socialist Family | The Graph « Leftoutinamerica's Blog()

  • Pingback: Meet the SKDKnickerFockers, Pt 1! | The Graph()