Update #2: Sandra Fluke’s Boyfriend, Adam “Cutie Pants” Mutterperl, And His Radical Socialist Family

Posted on March 13, 2012 by Brooks Bayne in Articles

(Filed under: “Never mind, media, we’ll do your damned job, losers.”)

Updated: Added link to the Jewish Encyclopedia for an explanation of “traditional Jewish socialism“, amongst those who’ve chosen the socialist/marxist ideology. It’s in the first paragraph about Adam’s parents. I assumed the readers could Google something if they had questions, but I was wrong. 

Update #2: Finally, The Washington Times is now asking the right questions. Like, “Hey, Anita Dunn, what role did the White House play in having Sandra Fluke appear before congress?” This is looking bad for SKDKnickerbocker, Anita’s PR firm.

Behold! Sandra Fluke's boyfriend, Adam Mutterperl!

Recently, it was reported that Sandra Fluke is connected to none other than 1%’er, William (Bill) Mutterperl, through her boyfriend. However, it wasn’t reported who her boyfriend is. Everyone, meet Sandra’s boyfriend, wannabe producer, and amateur stand-up comic, Adam “Cutie Pants” Mutterperl, in this video audition he submitted to a “reality” show:

Cutie pants? This guy the epitome of what everyone thought Sandra Fluke’s boyfriend would be. Maybe Adam could produce a biopic titled, “Beta Males and the Progressive Chicks Who Dig Them”.

Anyway, here are some pictures of Sandra and Adam frolicking in typical ghetto places like Spain and Italy:

The caption that Adam added to one of the Barcelona pics, “Pretty drunk”. Is this the part where I’m supposed to pay for your condoms, Adam? You know, because traveling between L.A., D.C., and New York, and vacationing in Barcelona, Italy, etc., is pretty darned expensive. I get it. Did you piss off your uber-wealthy parents to get cut off from your trust fund? You and Sandra must need some government subsidies. Idea: mock hearing. Brilliant!

Awesome that Adam is so happy about Sandra making “the big time” (h/t to SooperMexican for this particular screenshot). 

Bill and Nancy Mutterperl, Adam's parents. Love the color of your hat, Bill. It's reflective of your ideals.

Anyway, on to Adam’s “typical Democrat family”. The term BIll O’Reilly used to describe Bill Mutterperl is “Democratic stalwart”. However, as soon as I heard his name in a story about Sandra Fluke, I almost choked, due to my sudden epiphany. Why? Because anyone familiar with Boston and New York political history knows about the wealthy Mutterperl family’s long tradition of supporting the traditional Jewish variant of socialism. Bill Mutterperl’s family are much more than Democratic stalwarts.

I’ll let Woody Allen give you the basic overview (if Woody introduces left-wing, Jewish socialism, it’s not anti-Semitic, AMIRIGHT?!):

(Transcript of the video clip: “What’s your name… Allison… You’re like New York Jewish, left-wing, intellectual, Central Park West, Brandeis University, socialist summer camps and the father with the Ben Shahn drawings, really strike-oriented. Stop me before I make a complete imbecile of myself… No, that was wonderful! I love being reduced to a cultural stereotype.”)

Allen’s description probably describes Adam’s childhood, right down to the Ben Shahn drawings. I wonder if Adam has ever been to a kibbutz.

The Mutterperl family, via Adam’s great grandfather Sol’s handbag fortune, established the “Mutterperl Scholarship Endowment Fund” in 1951 for Brandeis University. This school, as some people call it, is named for Louis Brandeis, a secular Jew, Zionist, and United States Supreme Court Justice appointed by Woodrow Wilson. Brandeis was a self-proclaimed socialist. Herbert Marcuse, the famous Frankfurt School Marxist, came to Brandeis in 1954, three years after the Mutterperl fund was created. Brandeis University is one of the nation’s leading petri dishes for anti-American and neo-Marxist thought. Here’s the statement from the Brandeis bulletin about the Mutterperl fund:

Traditions of charity inculcated in their children by a New York couple, who recently celebrated their Golden Wedding Anniversary, are being perpetuated in their honor by the children who have established a Sol and Susanne Mutterperl Scholarship Endowment Fund at Brandeis University.

Honoring the 50th wedding anniversary of Mr. and Mrs. Sol Mutterperl, the endowment fund has been established by means  of a substantial initial grant which will be augmented from time to time.

The initial grant was made by the children through the Mutterperl Foundation, Inc., which was organized in December, 1951, by Raphael Mutterperl: his brother, Martin Mutterperl, and their sister’s husband, Ludwig S. Buckhardt. for the purpose of fostering the philanthropic ideals of their parents.

President of the Foundation is Raphael Mutterperl, prominent New Bedford (Mass.) manufacturer.

Since Sol is credited with creating the women’s handbag market, and was a wealthy manufacturer and proprietor of those goods, he and his wife, Susanne, lived at 22 Central Park West in Manhattan for a time, and then at 350 Central Park West. Not too shabby, Mutterperl! Sol was also supportive of unions and was the Director of the United Jewish Appeal (now The Jewish Federations of North America) a Jewish “social” organization. From the JFNA website:

The Federation movement, collectively among the top 10 charities on the continent, protects and enhances the well-being of Jews worldwide through the values of tikkun olam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and Torah (Jewish learning).

There’s that “social justice” code word again. Jewish Socialism is linked to a very progressive concept of the above tikkun olam. New Bedford, MA, where Raphael Mutterperl ran the family’s manufacturing arm, was a hotbed of  Marxist trade-unionism in early 20th century America. Why? It was easy to “sell” radical trade-unionism to a whole people group who were brought up in the lap of Weimar Marxian ideology, because New Bedford had many new eastern-European Jewish immigrants living there at the time, including, of course, the Mutterperl family.

For some added historical context, two popular Marxists, Samuel Gompers and Daniel De Leon, agitated in New Bedford, and were instrumental in fomenting strikes amongst the workers of the textile mills there. As I wrote before, Gompers was the founder of what is now the largest Marxist union organization in America, the AFL-CIO.

In addition to the Mutterperl’s extensive history within the Jewish socialist activist/political world, and their generational wealth, they’re still doing what they can to help the 99%. An excerpt from Bill’s current Reed Smith LLP (one of the 15 largest law firms in the world) bio:

Bill is a partner in Reed Smith’s Financial Industry Group. He specializes in providing high level counseling to CEO’s, General Counsel, Boards of Directors and members of senior management of major financial institutions.

As the former Vice Chairman of The PNC Financial Services Group, he held management responsibilities for certain PNC staff functions, including legal, compliance, legislative affairs and media relations, and he was responsible for implementing best practices for corporate governance. He served on several senior management committees, including Mergers and Acquisitions, Corporate Re-Engineering and Consumer affairs, and also served as management liaison to a special ad hoc committee of the Board of Directors dealing with regulatory affairs and corporate governance. He also served as a PNC representative on the Board of Directors of BlackRock Investment Management, one of the largest investment management firms in the world.

Bill also had a distinguished 25-year career at FleetBoston Financial Corp. where he served as its Executive Vice President and General Counsel world-wide, responsible for all legal affairs of the company.

In addition, Bill served as Executive Director of the Independent Oversight Board for Arthur Andersen, headed by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker. The other members of the Independent Oversight Board included current and former CEO’s of major U.S. companies. Bill advised the Board on proposed best corporate governance practices to be adopted by Andresen in the wake of governmental investigations and criticisms of that firm.

In private practice, Bill was a partner in the business law division of Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels in Boston, specializing in corporate governance issues. He began his legal career at the law firm of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.

You’ll recall that Paul Volcker, mentioned in Bill’s bio, was Obama’s bank bailout architect, advisor, and appointee. I know! Random, right?

Bill has also made nearly $90,000 in personal donations to Dems and their allies in the past 10 years, according to OpenSecrets.org. Check out the awesome Daddy Warbucks screenshots:

Adam’s mother is Nancy Mutterperl. According to the  California Secretary of State, she’s involved with a company operating in Beverly Hills, CA as Charlotte Lu, LLC. They specialize in jewelry that runs from $300, to nearly $4000. Their website has a brief bio of Nancy, listing her role as “Business Development and Display“:

Raised in West Haven, Connecticut, Nancy Mutterperl enjoyed studying art history in college, but it was her love of jewelry that led to her earning certificates from the Gemological Institute of America. While she was a stay-at-home mom, Nancy began creating her own jewelry pieces that were sold in retail stores and catalogs. Nancy’s experience with gemstones gives her the edge for selecting beautiful stones for Charlotte Lu. Nancy is married, has two sons and resides in both Manhattan and Beverly Hills.

Stay-at-home mom, indeed. You know, typical, bi-coastal, “stalwarty” kind of stuff in the Mutterperl family. I wonder if Adam lives with mom here in Beverly Hills. From the looks of Adam’s audition video above, it’s safe to assume that mom imparted some of the “art history” stuff that she enjoyed in college, unto her son.

In summary (with bold for emphatic inflection): Sandra Fluke is a 30 year old leftist activist, attending Georgetown University, whom the Dems tried to inject, via non-sequitur, into Issa’s hearing about Obamacare’s encroachment upon religious freedoms, protected by the Establishment Clause in the 1st Amendment. Her boyfriend, Adam Mutterperl, is the son of one of the most well-connected leftist Jewish families on the East Coast (add the West Coast to that, apparently), with ties to neo-Marxist Brandeis University as decades old donors… and whose father, Bill Mutterperl, worked directly for Paul Volcker, one of Obama’s pals, advisors, and Keynesian “stimulus” bill architects. Yet, we’re supposed to believe that this just boils down to a poor girl needing us to “subsidize” her birth control. RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT!

We’re talking Sgt. Schultz levels of ignorance and avoidance if you buy that load of schmutz.

Some have claimed that Sandra’s reps (Anita Dunn’s PR firm – Anita’s the Mao lover, and former Obama Communications Director) are lying about the Mutterperl “boyfriend”. I’ve posted the Facebook photos, above, of them, that are dated, and go back a few years – but you never see them kiss in their photos. To me, it’s obvious that she’s in bed with him, literally, or figuratively. Either way, Sandra’s connection to this particular Jewish-American socialist dynasty is a “little” secret that they don’t want you to know. Which begs the question… if you’re so connected to the Mutterperl family, Sandra, why not go to Brandeis, a school much more aligned with your worldview, instead of Georgetown University, a Catholic Jesuit school? Are you admitting that a Christian school is better than a neo-Marxist school, or is there some other agenda? Now *that’s* funny when you think about it.

Based on all this random connectedness, I’d love it if Miss Fluke would sue Georgetown for “subsidized” birth control. The Georgetown lawyers would have a field day with discovery. Do it, Sandra. I dare you.

Oh, as a complete aside, check out Adam’s grandpappy, Martin Mutterperl, hanging out with Cass Sunstein’s, (another Obama appointee, Regulatory Czarina, and overall radical leftist) great-uncle, Alexander Cass Sunstein, and Samuel “Subway Sam” Rosoff, the guy who killed one of his detractors over a labor union spat, in Palm Beach back in 1965, at the Ambassador Hotel (see: photo below). Purely coincidence, I’m sure, since they’re all associated with Marxists, socialists, and trade-unionists of Eastern-European, Jewish, descent. There are some other interesting names in this list. Can you spot them?! Just kidding. Move along. Nothing to see here, hobbits.

Fox News, Soros’ White Whale?

Posted on December 7, 2010 by Xavier Lerma in Opinion

Recently, billionaire George Soros had surrendered supporting the Democrats in America. Now Soros seeks revenge for his failure. Soros’ new plan is to attack only ONE TV STATION that airs contrary beliefs to Mr. Soros’ agenda. According to the New York Times Michael D. Shear,

Mr. Soros, a billionaire who has a
history of supporting liberal politicians and causes, accused Fox News
hosts of “incendiary rhetoric” and said he hoped that his money would
be used “in an effort to more widely publicize the challenge Fox News
poses to civil and informed discourse in our democracy.”

Fox News, Soros’ White Whale?

“Soros, I have heard of Fox News – but was it not Fox News that stole your treasure and says bad things against thee?”, said Vivian Schiller

“Who told thee that?”, cried Soros. “Aye, it was Fox News that dismantled me and my plans! Aye, aye!”, he shouted with a terrific, loud, animal sob, like that of a heart stricken moose; “Aye, aye! It was that accursed Fox News that mocks me; made a fool of me and the Democrats for ever and a day!”

Then Soros shouted, “Aye, aye! and I’ll chase them round Good Hope, and round the Horn, and round the Norway Maelstrom, and round perdition’s flames before I give them up! And this is what you have shipped for men! To chase Fox News on both sides of land, and over all sides of earth, till it spouts black blood and rolls fin out. What say ye, men, will ye splice hands on it now? I think ye do look brave.” said Soros.

“Aye, aye!” shouted Media Matters, NPR and the rest of Soros’ network. “A sharp eye for Fox; a sharp lance for Fox News. Death to Fox news! Death to Fox news!

Soros and his minions could easily play in Herman Melville’s novel, “Moby Dick”. All Soros needs is an ivory peg leg.

In other words, Soros is mad at Fox because he believes they are the reason the Democrats lost last November.

I got news for you Soros. The fascists you helped in capturing your own Jewish people were defeated in France and Italy by Americans. Americans love freedom of speech, freedom of the press and will not tolerate another Hitler who suppresses those freedoms. America is where kings and billionaires can buy goods and even souls but Americans will not accept a tyrant.

IF YOU DISAGREE WITH FOX, CHANGE THE CHANNEL! Why would anyone watch a show they disagree with? I’m sure Soros can hire someone to switch the channel to ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and a host of other news channels. Watch CNN’s Piers Morgan beat #1 Fox News. CNN’s new British host said, “I’m going to be there to win… it’s time to kick some ratings butt!”. Fox is still number one, but enjoy the show Soros and chill out.

Why would anyone watch a show they disagree with? Of course Soros doesn’t watch Fox! He doesn’t want you to watch Fox. Soros says he’s helping you but he just doesn’t want you to know what Fox News is broadcasting. Soros says he is a man of Democracy yet he does not want this one, lonely tv station to have their legal right of freedom of the press. The “biggest spider on the web” as I once called him , has an agenda.

Soros wants,

• Open borders (no such thing as illegal immigrants)
• Legalize all drugs in America
• Remove Christianity from public view.

Fox News has programs that favor defending America’s borders, fighting drugs and favoring Christianity. That pretty much pops Soros’ balloon. He has also seen the success of the Tea Party and is blaming Fox which is the only network to favor the tea parties. That’s right! Soros is afraid of ONE TV STATION. Media Matters is also afraid of only one tv station..

Media Matters job is to attack Fox News on the internet and elsewhere 24/7. Media Matters in the past would never admit they received money from Soros but now the cat is out of the bag. Michael D. Shear wrote,

“We are especially pleased that in this moment of hidden right-wing billionaire money corrupting our democracy, Mr. Soros, upon deciding to support our efforts, quickly and transparently has made that support public,” the statement from Media Matters says.

Supposedly Fox News is supported by “hidden right-wing billionaire money corrupting our democracy”. Actually, like all TV stations except PBS, advertisers support them. The more people watch the more advertisers there are which equals $$$. Media Matters is telling us ONE TV STATION has corrupted America. OH NO!. I wonder what happened to ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN? Who supports all these liberal and Democratic stations? Advertisers and the people who watch them.

Beware the Fox in the Hen-House!

Soros is protecting Americans from the Fox. That is all he is doing. Just like he protected his own people from the Nazis. He was just telling Adolf Eichmann where the money was. It wasn’t his fault the fascists took away his people and murdered them. So what if Soros pretended to be Christian. Now he wants to protect you and me from the Fox. Don’t you feel safe? Soros is the same now as he was when he betrayed his own people. Except now he has billions of dollars to help you and me. Isn’t that just great?

New York Times Michael D. Shear wrote,

“Soros Donates $1 Million to Media Matters”

He wrote Media Matters stated October 20th how they came out of the closet and finally admitted they received money from Soros. His article is here.

I feel safer already don’t you? Henny Penny and America is so grateful that Soros protects us from that bad old Fox. Thank you Mr. Soros. We know you won’t deceive us like you did in France where you were convicted of insider trading. We don’t care if you are a felon or that you ruin other countries economies. Just as long as you keep us from that bad old Fox.

Fox News tells lies and even favors Christianity. We can’t have that. No, sir. Soros will not only destroy the Fox but also give us an alternative like National Public Radio (NPR). NPR recently fired the only black journalist they had because he said bad things about Muslims. Shame on him. NPR to the rescue!

NPR is government-funded which means Americans are forced to pay NPR. New York Times Elizabeth Jensen wrote that Soros gave

$1.8 million to NPR

His money will help Americans fight conservative talk radio. Jensen wrote, “NPR has received a $1.8 million grant from the Open Society Foundations to begin a project called Impact of Government that is intended to add at least 100 journalists at NPR member radio stations in all 50 states over the next three years..”

NPR is fair and not like Fox. NPR would never fire people like CNN, who got rid of Lou Dobbs, Glenn Beck and Rick Sanchez. NPR would never do that. Would they?

NPR fires 10 year veteran Juan Williams

Williams who is a liberal was fired October 20th after he said that after 911 he gets nervous on the plane when he sees someone dressed in muslim clothes. Williams is a liberal who goes on Fox News from time to time as a commentator to voice the liberal viewpoint.

Liberals on Fox?

Although Soros would have you to believe that Fox is all conservative and is corrupting the country with lies, Fox has several liberals along with Geraldo Rivera, Bob Beckel, Will Ferrell, the court jester John Stewart and many others who voice their opinions. They all don’t have shows like Geraldo Rivera but they are guest commentators like Juan Williams. They have time to give it their best shot and state their viewpoints.

So what exactly did Juan Williams do to get fired? NPR’s David Folkenflik wrote:

“NPR News has terminated the contract of longtime news analyst Juan
Williams after remarks he made on the Fox News Channel about Muslims.

Williams appeared Monday on The O’Reilly Factor, and host Bill
O’Reilly asked him to comment on the idea that the U.S. is facing a
dilemma with Muslims.

Williams responded: “Look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of
books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country.
But when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who
are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying
themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get
nervous.”

Williams also warned O’Reilly against blaming all Muslims for
“extremists,” saying Christians shouldn’t be blamed for Oklahoma City
bomber Timothy McVeigh.

But strong criticism followed Williams’ comments.

Late Wednesday night, NPR issued a statement praising Williams as a
valuable contributor but saying it had given him notice that it is
severing his contract. “His remarks on The O’Reilly Factor this past
Monday were inconsistent with our editorial standards and practices,
and undermined his credibility as a news analyst with NPR,” the
statement read.

Williams’ presence on the largely conservative and often contentious
prime-time talk shows of Fox News has long been a sore point with NPR
News executives.”

After the incident millions called NPR to protest. Liberals like Whoopee Goldberg and Barbara Walters said the firing was wrong. Where was the NAACP to stand up for poor Juan?

Andy Barr for “Politico” wrote:

“Juan Williams said Friday morning that NPR fired him this week because
the radio network had become “vindictive” over his appearances on Fox
News.

“I knew about their antagonism toward Fox. I knew they didn’t like
it,” Williams said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“NPR, and especially this last group of managers, became vindictive
[and,] as you can see, personal in terms of their antagonism toward
me,” he said.

NPR CEO Vivian Schiller on Thursday said that Williams should have
kept his comments between himself and “his psychiatrist or his
publicist.” Schiller later apologized for the comment.”

Soros is a puppeteer according to Williams. At around 8:46, he says,

“He’s the puppeteer” Soros conversation between 8:20 and 8:50

Soros donated 1.8 million to NPR and tells NPR to release anyone associated with Fox News his nemesis. So out goes Juan Williams and NPR’s Maria Liasson is next. She also appears on Fox News every now and then. .

What will Soros do next? Buy out cable companies so he can ban Fox? Then what will he do after that? Buy all the TV stations or force TV antennas off the market? He does all that for ONE tv station even though there are so many other stations to watch other than Fox News his nemesis.

Soros gets angry between 4:40 and 6:12

Soros can try to censor the one TV station called Fox News, Juan Williams and other reporters who tell the truth, but Schwartz (a.k.a. Soros) will never succeed in a country where freedom of speech and freedom of the press is law. Soros may spit on the Bill of Rights but in America it’s etched in stone and in every American’s heart.

READ ‘EM AND WEEP SOROS!

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

-First Amendment of the United States of America

.
Xavier Lerma

Liberalism: Psychosis, Evil or Ignorance?

Posted on December 3, 2010 by Xavier Lerma in Opinion

Are liberals mentally ill, spiritually depraved or just ignorant good-hearted people trying to improve society? Liberalism defined by Merriam-Webster: “a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race”. It sounds nice but history has already proven that political liberalism is not beneficial. Unfortunately, many still adhere to its philosophy which has led many psychiatrists to examine this behavior.

One such psychiatrist, Dr. Lyle Rossiter wrote the book:

“The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness”

“Psychopathology of the Liberal Mind:
The adult drive toward omnipotent control of others, in any arena whatever, is rooted in fears of separation, abandonment loss or abuse–the residual effects of early attachment gone wrong. The need to dominate others arises from the tyrant’s need for absolute assurance that the catastrophic loss of dependency or the pain of abuse so devastating to him in his earliest years will not be repeated.”

“Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”

Dr. Lyle Rossiter has 37 years experience with more than 1,500 patients as a board certified clinical psychiatrist. He is also a board certified forensic psychiatrist who has examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases. He was educated at the University of Chicago.

No wonder he had a lot of patients! Obama and his crew came from Chicago. Dr. Rossiter was also a psychiatrist in the army for two years. His website for his book is here. His professional website is here.

He also writes, ” America’s founding fathers intended, as the Preamble tells us, to establish justice, insure peace, provide for the nation’s defense, promote its general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty. But the entire twentieth century, and the dawn of the twenty-first, have witnessed modern liberalism’s relentless attacks on all of these goals and on all of the principles on which individual liberty and rational social order rest.”

Many times on the Michael Savage Show he says, “Liberalism is a mental disorder“. He actually wrote a book on it. I always laugh when he says it. Recently I reflected what is the common denominator among the liberals that I have met in my life and came up with a list. Maybe yours is the same or different.

Liberals have all or most of these qualities:

-prefer to insult others rather than use logic and reasoning

-have an arrogant behavior

-use anti-depressants or illegal drugs

-favor Marxists, Socialists or Communists

-against all or part of the 10 Commandments

-favor killing babies (abortion)

-dislike Christians

-liars

-like Lucifer they hate obedience or responsibility

.

Then I made a list of qualities of people I have met that are conservative. They have most of these characteristics:

-try to follow the 10 commandments

-have a spiritual life either as a Muslim, Jew, Buddhist, Christian, etc.

-have a genuine love for their Creator and people around them

-selfless

Selfless? It almost sounds like Anakin Skywalker when he was talking to Senator Palpatine about the Jedi’s virtues in “Revenge of the Sith“. “The Jedi use their power for good. The Jedi are selfless. They only care about others.” Senator Palpatine (aka Darth Sidious) was trying to seduce Anakin to the dark side by rationalizing his need of it.

When we rationalize anything seems acceptable. Determining good ethics can be easy just as those who planned the “final solution”. That is one extreme. Another is how Obama allows chaos and death on the US / Mexican border in order to promote Soros’ agenda of open borders and keep the Hispanic vote.

In the next video O’Reilly and Savage both speak about liberalism in America. O’Reilly calls them “secularists”. Savage sees the radical left attacking the church. Michael Savage compares Communist Russia and modern America in this video.

Fox News’ O’Reilly argues with Michael Savage about Liberalism

.

Dr. Michael Savage (Michael Weiner) has been a successful national talk show host since 1994. His Jewish grandfather escaped Russia’s Bolshevik revolution and came to the U.S.. Savage was a liberal like David Horowitz who also later became a conservative. He is not your average talk show host.

He is highly educated with two Masters degrees. One in medical botany and the other in medical anthropology. Savage has a Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley, in nutritional ethnomedicine. He has written five New York Times best-selling books including “Trickle Up Poverty: Stopping Obama’s Attack on Our Borders, Economy, and Security”.

“Liberalism is a Mental Disorder” by Rap artist “The Infidel”

.

If you are in the public eye and speak the truth you will be attacked. When people speak the truth against the king, his royal subjects try to silence them. Michael Savage was banned from Britain for saying too much that the Obama administration did not like.

Dr. Manning defends Savage for being banned from Britain and tells how other conservatives like Fox News’ O’Reilly will not defend him.

.

Leaders of liberalism have learned from Marx and Engel who promised prosperity, justice and freedom but only brought chaos and death to their people. History has proven the terrible effect it has on the world.

Liberals who led Communism, Socialism and Marxism all were doomed and failed miserably. Russia, China, Korea, Vietnam, Europe, countries in Latin America and others have benefited not one iota. Perhaps their leaders managed to revel in their riches but certainly not the people.

Lenin and Trotsky did not bring prosperity to Russia. The destruction of Christ Our Savior Cathedral by the Communists unleashed the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse and innocent millions were murdered. The Red terror created slave labor camps called “gulags”. The Ukraine was one giant concentration camp, “Holodomor.

China’s Mao Zedong brought millions to their death as well. Tens of millions of Chinese were murdered during the “Great Leap Forward”. Fortunately, China is more capitalist now much to Fidel Castro’s chagrin. Nevertheless, the people in China as in Cuba are mostly poor in comparison to even today’s citizens of the U.S..

National Socialist German Workers’ Party was not Communist. It can be argued they were socialists as defined by Ludwig Von Mises. The government controlled everything just like the Soviets did. Some say Hitler had purposely made the Nazi flag red in order to attract Communists. His advances in operation Barbarossa were noticeably rejected by Stalin. Hitler was looked upon as a hero who eventually led his people to ruin.

Vietnam’s Ho Chi Minh’s name was equivalent to death. He sent 850,000 Vietnamese to their graves in “education camps” which does not include the war. The Democrats forced out President Nixon with Watergate. When the Democratic Congress refused to honor President Nixon’s promise to defend South Vietnam, the North Vietnamese overran the south and later Laos and Cambodia.

The U.S. was the only country that never lost a major battle in Vietnam but allowed Communism to spread thanks to the Communist sympathizers known as the Democrats. Without America to defend them, millions more died under Communism in Laos and especially Cambodia. The blood of millions more were on the Democrats hands.

Socialism has made Europe economically and morally ill with some saying it started in America. Would it be better to say that the crash in 2008 was organized? Odd, George Soros actually made millions when everyone lost money. When will America investigate that old buzzard??? Fortunately, America said, “Hell no!”, to Socialism in November 2010.

Remember Velma Hart? She was the one who told off Socialist Obama in front of America last September: “…and quite frankly, I’m exhausted. I’m exhausted of defending you, defending your administration, defending the mantle of change that I voted for …and deeply disappointed with where we are right now.” Did Obama help her?

Are you kidding? She got laid off and lost her job just like others did the week before Thanksgiving. It was not Velma Hart who punched Obama in the mouth on Friday November 26th. Although, in my previous article, “Velma Hart, Voice of America” I joked, “Who is Velma Hart? She is the one who punched Obama in the face on American TV and got away with it.”. Well, maybe she did do it. Way to go Velma!

Liberals may have some good ideas and policies but they always want the government to take more of your money (not their money) and use it. Who can better take care of your money? You or the government? This is a must see video that raises good financial questions. One example, Planned Parenthood versus Pro Life Groups are compared in the next video. Which is more cost-effective?

DEBATE: “Conservatism versus Liberalism”

.

Famous comedian and talk show host, Dennis Miller said on the “Tonight Show” that he was a social liberal but a fiscal conservative. His honesty is on his sleeve. Contrast that to a liberal Democrat who like a Communist, lies when promising equality and a better life for all in order to put themselves in power.

Keep in mind that not all Democrats are liberal and not all Republicans are conservative. However, overall, Republicans lower taxes and are pro-life while most Democrats are liberal and prefer to raise taxes (take more of your money) and always promote abortion (killing babies) and Planned Parenthood. It has been that way after Kennedy was assassinated and LBJ took over in 1963.

For example, liberal Republican McCain always backed Planned Parenthood and abortions until he ran for president where he magically became a pro-life candidate. Fortunately, most Republicans are always pro-life and want less money from the people.

When Americans first complained about the Communist subversive activities in the country they were ridiculed. Most Communists then began calling themselves Socialists. When Americans exposed the Socialists as Marxists they were ridiculed again. Now Democrats use the term “progressive”. What name will they use next? Will they call themselves “Saviors”?

The progressive claims he desires bigger government control of human life and generally has no consciousness of God. Those in political office promise equality and a better life for everyone as they rise to power. Sounds like Communism to me.

Below are the “Ten Reasons to Reject Socialism” by The American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property.

“Why we must protect the family, private property and America from the dangers of Socialism.”

1. Socialism and communism are the same ideology

Communism is but an extreme form of socialism. From the ideological standpoint, there is no substantial difference between the two.

2. Socialism violates personal freedom

Socialism seeks to eliminate “injustice” by transferring rights and responsibilities from individuals and families to the State. In the process, socialism actually creates injustice. It destroys true liberty: the freedom to decide all matters that lie within our own competence and to follow the course shown by our reason, within the laws of morality, including the dictates of justice and charity.

3. Socialism violates human nature

Socialism is anti-natural. It destroys personal initiative – a fruit of our intellect and free will – and replaces it with State control. It tends to totalitarianism, with its government and police repression, wherever it is implemented.

4. Socialism violates private property

Socialism calls for “redistributing the wealth” by taking from the “rich” to give to the poor. It imposes taxes that punish those who have been able to take greater advantage of their productive talents, capacity to work or thrift. It uses taxation to promote economic and social egalitarianism, a goal that will be fully achieved, according to The Communist Manifesto, with the “abolition of private property.”

5. Socialism opposes traditional marriage

Socialism sees no moral reason for people to restrict sex to marriage, that is, to an indissoluble union between a man and a woman. Furthermore, socialism undermines private property, which Friedrich
Engels, founder of modern socialism and communism along with Karl Marx, saw as the foundation of traditional marriage.

6. Socialism opposes parental rights in education

Socialism has the State, and not parents, control the education of children. Almost from birth, children are to be handed over to public institutions, where they will be taught what the State wants, regardless of parental views. Evolution must be taught. School prayer must be forbidden.

7. Socialism promotes radical equality

A supposed absolute equality among men is the fundamental assumption of socialism. Therefore, it sees any inequality as unjust in itself. Private employers are quickly portrayed as “exploiters” whose profits really belong to their employees. As a consequence, they rule out the system of wage earning.

8. Socialism promotes atheism

Belief in God, who unlike us is infinite, omnipotent and omniscient, clashes head-on with the principle of absolute equality. Socialism therefore rejects the spiritual, claiming that only matter exists. God, the soul, and the next life are illusions according to socialism.

9. Socialism promotes relativism

For socialism there are no absolute truths or revealed morals that establish standards of conduct that apply to everyone, everywhere, and always. Everything evolves, including right and wrong, good and evil. There is no place for the Ten Commandments, neither in the private mind nor in the public square.

10. Socialism mocks religion

According to Karl Marx, religion is “the opium of the people.” Lenin, founder of the Soviet Union, agreed: “Religion is opium for the people. Religion is a sort of spiritual booze in which the slaves of capital drown their human image, their demand for a life more or less worthy of man.”

“May God protect America from Socialism”

.

There is a reason that most Americans are not taught the Bolshevik Revolution.

If you think that list was too short or unbelievable then I have just the thing for you. That is, if you want the truth. “The Communist Takeover Of America – 45 Declared Goals” from the U.S. Congressional Record, Vol. 109 88^th, Appendix, pp. A34-A35 , January 10, 1963. The list will make you ask, “Are they insane?”.

The answer to that is yes, the Communists and other liberals are insane. If you are over 50 you can see that almost everything that was written has already occurred in America. If you are young, you should first read “1963- The Year That Changed America” found on the middle of the page. A must read if you are an American. Another source is here.

Does America want a liberal or conservative government? Which is more effective? We all know government is wasteful and inefficient. Vladimir Putin warned against having a big liberal government at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland in 2009. He warned about the Soviet mistake.

.

“America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within.”

-Josef Stalin (evil)

“Only moral criteria can help the West against Communism’s well planned world strategy.”

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn (good)

Is liberalism an illness or perhaps a spiritual retardation? Isn’t the quarrel between liberals and conservatives really the same as evil and good? Light and Darkness? Physical laws exist and will never change. It is the same with spiritual laws that govern our souls.

If you stick your hand in the fire your hand will get burned and be of little use especially if you are dumb enough to keep doing it. If you steal something your soul will be damaged especially if you are dumb enough to keep doing it. It is not apparent at first but it has a damaging effect in your life. You will not improve yourself and your mind will be darkened to things that are obvious to others.

Most conservatives tend to stay in tune with a higher intelligence outside of themselves. They are more likely to admit their own flaws and failures. No one is perfect. Faith is the spiritual intelligence that cannot be fathomed by most radical liberals especially by atheist leaders like George Soros.

The spiritual life is the fourth dimension that cannot be measured by a tool. However, it can be measured by cause and effect. If you pray you will be enlightened and self-improvement will become evident. If you do not pray you will tend to have more mundane, animalistic reactions and behaviors. Carnal desires will have more control over the individual rather than the mind and soul. Criminals are more likely to be rehabilitated by religion.

We know a tree by its fruit. If a man says he is good but constantly beats his wife, we know he is really bad. A woman says she is a bad singer but every time she sings we hear a beautiful voice. We know she is a good singer. We know them by their actions not by what they say.

In the same way, always judge a politician by his actions and not during their election when it is too late. A conservative would tend to do their homework and find out the details of the politicians actions and deeds. A liberal votes by peer pressure or feelings they get from political advertisements.

So, are liberals mentally ill, spiritually depraved or just ignorant good-hearted people trying to improve society?

Well, Vladimir Lenin did say, “The so-called cultural element of Western Europe and America are incapable of comprehending the present state of affairs and the actual balance of forces; these elements must be regarded as deaf-mutes and treated accordingly”. Later he called President Wilson a “simpleton”.

The BBC has taken the evolved term “useful idiots” and defined it: “useful idiots, in a broader sense, refers to Western journalists, travelers and intellectuals who gave their blessing – often with evangelistic fervor – to tyrannies and tyrants, thereby convincing politicians and public that utopias rather than Belsens thrived.

John Sweeney for the BBC, does a great job and his report is important for us today as it is for future generations. He interviews Professor Donald Rayfield who says a useful idiot is:

“…someone who doesn’t think they’re an idiot, who thinks they’re highly intelligent, but is so easily persuaded by flattery from people in power; that they’re prepared to serve their purposes and allow themselves to be duped”.

“USEFUL IDIOTS “ (audio)

.

Xavier Lerma