The Socialist Roots Of The Egyptian Protests

Posted on January 29, 2011 by Brooks Bayne in Articles

Having been involved in the genesis of a well-known protest, I know how everyone, including the media, gets the facts wrong when they try to ascertain the reason such events occur. The media won’t ever pay the real movers and shakers of protests any notice because they don’t know who any of them are. They need comfy, famous names and faces to do part of their job for them. It’s been almost 2 years after the Tea Party Movement started and our own media still doesn’t know who started it, and in most cases, they still don’t know why!

On the morning of January 28th, 2011, 3 days after the first day of the Egyptian protests, I was reading through the #Jan25 hashtag stream on Twitter, and I noticed that most of the foreign tweets were in Arabic. No big deal… my browser has a “translate this page” feature, just click and voilà, the entire page is translated. The problem is, I started noticing that many of the Arabic #Jan25 tweets were using phrases that sounded like Karl Marx fanboys passing socialist love notes back and forth to one another in class. Since we at The Graph focus on combating the worldview of neo-Marxists, it’s easy for us to spot Marxist propaganda. So, I put on my grassroots protester hat and started digging in the social web streams, because that’s where grassroots protesters work their magic.

In America, people are concerned that the Muslim Brotherhood are involved in the origination of these protests. In many tweets from Egyptians/Arabs in the #Jan25 stream people were very adamant about the Muslim Brotherhood not being the group responsible for the protests. The Muslim Brotherhood sounds like the Tea Party Express of the Egyptian protests – the western mainstream media is incorrectly attributing them for something they didn’t create.

I found no tweets in the #Jan25 hashtag stream espousing Islamic extremism. However, most Egyptians still link Sharia with justice.

These Egyptian grassroots political activists, most of them socialist/Marxist/unionist, used the momentum of the recent “revolution” in Tunisia to kick-off their January 25th protests. But who was behind the protests in Tunisia? Were the same people responsible there? If you look at the people who were appointed to the new Tunisian government, that should be obvious. Socialists. In the first post-Ben Ali government, the following new people were initially selected to serve as part of a 17 member cabinet. The other members were pre-existing members from the old regime:

• Mustapha Ben Jafar from the Democratic Forum for Labour and Liberties – This party is an advisory member of the Socialist International and is a coalition member with the Communist Party of Tunisian Workers
• Ahmed Ibrahim of the Movement Ettajdid – A socialist party originally known as the Tunisian Communist Party
• Ahmed Najib Chebbi of the Progressive Democratic Party – This party was formerly known as the Progressive Socialist Rally
• And 3 members of the Tunisian General Labour Union – This group is part of the communist-created and global socialist organization, International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU). Seems the head of the AFL (now the AFL-CIO) was in a pissing match with the Soviets at the time, otherwise they’d all be part of the WFTU.

Are you seeing a pattern?

Gigi Ibrahim

Once it was decided by the activists in Egypt that protests were a “go”, they presented idea that they should use the January 25th holiday of “Police Day” (ironic, eh?) to launch their protests in Egypt. The activists’ thinking, based on blogs and tweets, was that the police wouldn’t be very motivated to mobilize against their protests on their holiday. Many of the activists have said that they were taken by the momentum of this particular protest, because they’ve organized many in the past that were quick to fizzle out.

Some of the activists were interviewed on Al Jazeera saying that there was no official party or group control of the protest, but their affiliations were quickly evident when searching them online. Al Jazeera didn’t bother pointing out that these two activists, among those who have been placed front and center by the protesters, are self-described socialists too.

• Gigi Ibrahim (pictured above left) – socialist activist, Egypt. She lists quotes from Marx among her favorite quotes on Facebook. She has also lived in Anaheim, CA.
• Wael Khalil – socialist activist/blogger, Egypt

The BBC World Service also interviewed Ms. Ibrahim, but the BBC didn’t bother pointing out Gigi’s socialism either. If you listen to any of these activists speak, they’re all crying for “democracy”, which, in their case, is apparently synonymous with socialism. Sure, they all despise Hosni Mubarak, but they would’ve protested anyone who wasn’t a socialist in the aftermath of the Tunisian protesters’ success.

Kamal Khalil, director of the Center for Socialist Studies with Ghazl el-Mahalla labor activist Kamal Mohamed el-Fayoumi, during Socialist Days 2007. (Photo by Hossam el-Hamalawy)

Here are some of the more well-known socialists groups involved in kicking off the January 25th protests (this list isn’t meant to be exhaustive as I’ve been trying to get up to speed on all this during the last 24 hours):

• Kafya/Kefaya  – “The Egyptian Movement for Change” – Translated to English it means “enough”. It’s made up of socialists, Marxists, (seems ‘Change’ means the same to them as it did to Barack) secularists and Islamists. Some see this group as Mubarak’s primary opposition group.
• Tagammu – “National Progressive Unionist Party” – a socialist political party in Egypt that rejects religious extremism.
• Mahalla/April 6th – a large group of unionists/socialists and their youth supporters. They launched a massive strike on April 6th, 2008, in Mahalla, Egypt, now known as the April 6th Youth Movement. Two of the recognized leaders of this movement Kamal Mohamed el-Fayoumi and Tarek Amin are well-known socialists in Egypt. In between the April 6th, 2008 strike and the January 25th, 2011 protests, Kamal participated in Socialist Days 2009 in Cairo, Egypt as a speaker. Socialist Days 2009 is also where Chris Harman, a well-known socialist author, and Marxist propagandist, from the UK, died while lecturing.
• The Center for Socialist Studies – an Egyptian group in Giza committed to bringing about “revolutionary socialism”. Led by director Kamal Khalil. The picture to the right is of Kamal Khalil and Kamal Mohamed el-Fayoumi (the leader of April 6th, mentioned above) at Socialist Days 2007. You can see the Center’s Twitter stream here.
• Nasserites –  mainly Arab nationalism combined with socialism and secularism. Named after former Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nassar. These supporters tended to be older in age and were in much smaller numbers at the protests, but their worldview is mostly consistent with their younger counterparts.

Another socialist activist, who was heavily involved in getting out the word via blogs and Twitter, said of this Kayfa ( one of the organizations mentioned above) member photographed below, “The best shot I took today.” The Kayfa sticker he’s holding probably says more about his leftist politics than Jihadi mayhem.

What do the protesters want? Well, originally, they wanted these demands met:

• To raise the minimum wage limit to LE 1200 and to get an unemployment aid.
• To cancel the emergency status in the country , to dismiss Habib El-Adly and to release all detainees without court orders. (this is in response to the alleged murder of Khaled Said)
• Disbanding the current parliament , to have a new free election and to amend the constitution in order to have two presidential limits only.

Although, now that the violence has escalated, curfews have been implemented, and an Internet blackout was forced by the government, many protesters are calling for a complete and total regime change. Mubarak firing his existing cabinet is not enough for some.

Some of you might say, “But you’re the guy who started The Graph. You guys are anti-Marxist.” That’s true, but you don’t have to take my word for all the above. Take the word of socialist organizations from around the world (just a few of the many articles out there):

• “Egypt and the fight for socialist revolution” – World Socialist Web Site
• “Tunisian Revolution Spreads, Egypt Regime Cowers” – Socialist Revolution, a socialist youth propaganda organization
• “Uprising In Egypt – The Revolution Is Spreading” – The Socialist Appeal

My takeaway from all this is that the Muslim Brotherhood has not been instrumental in this movement to date. The socialists involved in the January 25th uprising do not trust the Muslim Brotherhood politically because they see that group as beholden to Egyptian capitalism. However, the Brotherhood has money, powerful people who don’t mind engaging in murder, and years of organization on their side. If they want to co-opt this movement, they’ll be a force that the Egyptian neo-Marxists have to deal with.

Based on the people involved in the Tunisian movement, the April 6th Youth Movement/Mahalla Strike, and those involved in the creation of the January 25th protests, it’s clear that the current “revolution” in Africa has more to do with socialism than it does about Islamic fundamentalism, although the latter is playing a strong secondary role within some of the factions. Socialism has very deep roots in the Egypt and the Middle East going back to the era of Salama Moussa who wrote the first Arabic book on socialism in 1912 titled, “Al-Ishtirākiyya (The Socialism)”. Moussa also helped form Egypt’s Socialist Party (later to be renamed the Communist Party in 1923) in 1921 alongside the likes of foreigner Joseph Rosenthal.

It seems as if there’s no real alternative to dictators or socialist organizations in Egypt and many other countries in the Middle East. The better question to ask is, “Who isn’t a socialist in Egypt?” If you remove a dictator there, you’re bound to end up with some flavor of socialism as a result. Capitalism is evil to Islamic socialists because it’s of the Western non-believer. Socialism is allowed to flourish to a degree, but under dictators it’s mostly just a bone to throw to the masses as appeasement. Arab socialism is different in some ways to the old Soviet communism because of the Islamic influence rejecting the Soviet tenets that were incompatible with the worldview of Muslims. As evidenced by the poll earlier in this post, many of the secular leftists in this region accept Sharia as being generally beneficial.

Where does George Soros fit into all this? Or does he? I engaged one of the Egyptian socialist activists on Twitter to learn more about the origin of the protests. When I asked who was originally behind the movement, he linked me to GlobalVoices. You can see the tweet here. Who funds GlobalVoices? Soros’ Open Society Institute, of course. It’s interesting that Soros-funded GlobalVoices’ January 25 protest timeline starts with a post on the 23rd asking if the January 25th protests were going to be Egypt’s Intifada.

Intifada was the word given to the uprising, or shaking off, in the 1987 Gaza/West Bank clash between Palestinian Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza, and the Israelis. During this First Intifada, Zachary Lockman wrote, “Israeli forces killed an estimated 1,100 Palestinians and Palestinians killed 164 Israelis, Palestinians killed an estimated 1,000 other Palestinians as alleged collaborators, although fewer than half had any proven contact with the Israeli authorities”. How nice of a Soros-funded GlobalVoices to suggest Intifada. I think it’s worth investigating to see if Soros did have a hand in the protests in Tunisia and Egypt.

Leave it to the mainstream media to get yet another modern historical protest wrong. The Tea Party protests and the January 25 protests have almost nothing in common, save for the fact that the media doesn’t seem too interested in either protests’ precise origin. On behalf of the lamestream media, I nominate the Tea Party Express and the Muslim Brotherhood for the “irrelevant fire-starter” award.

As I’ve been writing this post, protests have begun in Saudi Arabia (doubt their protesters get too far), Yemen, Albania, and Jordan. Any takers on what ideology is behind the rest these protests? There are already reports of the Socialist Party speaking out in Albania against the current government there.

Neo-Marxism In Corporate America: Google CEO, Eric Schmidt

Posted on January 20, 2011 by Brooks Bayne in Articles

I’m starting a series with this post. The purpose of this series is to highlight influential individuals in corporate America, who are either complicit in advancing neo-Marxist ideology, or those who are heavily influenced by it.

Schmidt holds a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Princeton University as well as a master’s degree and Ph.D. in computer science from the University of California, Berkeley. Both schools are well-known for their left of center culture, with UC Berkeley being among the most left-leaning universities in America. Prior to joining Google, Schmidt was the Chairman and CEO of Novell and Chief Technology Officer at Sun Microsystems, Inc., where he led the development of Java, Sun’s platform-independent programming technology. Earlier in his career, Schmidt Eric was a member of the research staff at Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) and held positions at Bell Laboratories and Zilog.

Diving right in.

Below, in a video from 2006, Schmidt interviews George Soros, a well-known neo-Marxist bent on destroying capitalism, and tips his hand (they all think “Bush lied”) when he starts his tack with the Iraq war (4:20), “[the] reason for the invasion was not supported by the evidence… what did we do wrong?” Soros responds saying the war is a “false metaphor” and that he wants to undermine the War On Terror. Someone might want to tell Schmidt and Soros that Democrats were also promoting the “Iraq has weapons of mass destruction” narrative.

Schmidt seems fascinated by Soros’ false metaphor claim and asks America’s arch-villain to help him through the decision gates regarding why the War On Terror isn’t a war (17:00). Typical crazy Soros nonsense ensues.
Schmidt, “It is a war, isn’t it?”
Soros, “No. No it isn’t. And it ought not to be.”
Schmidt, “Ok…”
Soros, “Because war creates innocent victims…”, and subsequently, according to George, more terrorists. This is nonsense, because there were no terrorists created by collateral casualties in Japan or Germany, nor were there any terrorists created in New York after the 9/11 attacks. Soros misses the point completely and he takes Schmidt over the cliff-of-crazy with him. These terrorists are men emboldened by the message of Jihad bil Saif (Jihad as warfare, or with the sword) and will use any excuse to justify their “cause”. But, to people with the worldview of Soros and Schmidt, it’s all Bush’s fault. Nothing new. By now, it’s so trite that I almost cringe typing the words “Bush’s fault”.

Here’s Eric Schmidt slobbering all over George Soros:

Next up, in the video below, Schmidt spoke at NASA’s 50th Anniversary Lecture Series, January 17, 2008 in Washington, DC. During his lecture he demonstrates Google’s technology, ironically, “not to make a point about global warming or sea level change”, but as soon as he says this, the computer model demonstration immediately depicts DC underwater due to unproven man-made global warming (11:50). Perhaps Schmidt will update his future presentations to show that sea level is expected to drop this year. Schmidt’s Family Foundation lists in their mission statement that they’re, “investing in a pattern of economic development that includes green, sustainable environmental practices and design”. It’s not surprising that this sounds like a worldview consistent with that of Al Gore’s, because the two did serve together on Apple’s board of directors.  And in 2007, they both keynoted a conference about Silicon Valley’s economy, globalization, and clean technology. Schmidt resigned from Apple’s board in 2009 citing conflicts of interest. But, according to Gore’s own website, Al’s still a senior advisor to Google, so the two are still working together on… maybe more fictional computer models for propaganda purposes?

Further along in the video, Schmidt says that people are naturally curious and that he wants to “take advantage of that curiosity” (24:50). Then Schmidt gets into a typical, leftist, world-without-borders, anecdote that, according to him, is a “message of peace, but it’s also a message of the importance of Earth” (44:25). National sovereignty be damned, eh?

Schmidt campaigned for Obama in 2008, and joined his transitional board after the election. Schmidt remains a PCAST (President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology) advisor to Obama.  Back in 2008, Schmidt pushed for a taxpayer funded technology bailout. Of course, there had to be an example of suggesting some federal fiscal irresponsibility in the mix somewhere.

In March of 2010, Soros’ Open Society Institute posted this on their website, urging Google to invest in Baltimore’s Internet infrastructure via the Google Fiber For Communities project:

“Google should consider Baltimore for this trial for the same reasons that I selected Baltimore for my philanthropic investment, and as the site of the only field office of the Open Society Institute in the United States,” said George Soros. “Baltimore has strong community institutions but still many people who suffer from being disconnected from important resources. The city and its residents would benefit dramatically from enhanced communications infrastructure. An investment in Baltimore is sure to yield positive returns both for Google and for the city.”

To date, Google still hasn’t selected the winning city. Note that Eric Schmidt is the chairman of the board of the New America Foundation and Jonathan Soros, George Soros’ son, President of the Soros Fund is on the New America Foundation Leadership Council. It will be interesting to see if Google selects Baltimore for the Google Fiber For Communities project.

Also contained in Schmidt’s various bios and resumes, is his involvement with the Menlo School as a trustee. It sits right next to Menlo College, Silicon Valley’s business school. The Menlo School is a well-known “progressive” prep school in Atherton, California (the city where Schmidt and his family live), complete with its own gay club, model United Nations club, Spanglish club (do they have cholo/chola appreciation day – and do the girls all draw their eyebrows on, I wonder?), and vegetarian club. What?! No hunting clubs?

Here’s the school’s values list (the italicized lines, my emphasis, the first two are typical leftist tenets – causes (trees, whales, seals, polar bears), diversity (racial quotas, watering down morality to make it accessible to the lowest common denominator, countenance wayward values with little or no regard to America’s heritage), and the third doesn’t quite make sense, but at least they worked “progressive” into the mix):

At Menlo School, we are passionate about encouraging students to:

• Pursue high standards of academic excellence.
• Discover the joy of learning.
• Stretch themselves and raise challenging questions.
• Demonstrate courage, integrity and a commitment to ethical behavior.
• Develop a sense of commitment to purposes larger than themselves.
• Appreciate the richness of diversity.
• Think independently and creatively.
• Take progressively more responsibility for themselves and their education.
• Lead healthful lives.

It’s sad that these kids are being indoctrinated by neo-Marxist ideology, complete with all the Herbert Marcuse-styled PC trimmings, because these kids are extremely bright.

To summarize Schmidt’s views and associations, he fawns over George Soros, works with George’s son, is part of the “Bush lied” crew, hangs with Al Gore, advises Obama, believes in man-made global warming, he wants to take your tax dollars for technology bailouts, and he’s the trustee of a school committed to corrupting kids with progressivism. All this makes me want to trash my Gmail account!

Eric Schmidt needs more scrutiny by those of us who don’t share his views.

We the People say, You Work For Us!

Posted on December 28, 2010 by Xavier Lerma in Opinion

Have you ever hired someone to do a job for you? Instead of doing their job they tell you what to do. Have you ever gone to a restaurant and the waiter tells you what you should eat? A restaurant like that would easily go out of business. Any business would go belly up if they ignored the customer. The same it will be with the arrogant U.S. government. They are trillions of dollars in debt and refuse to hear the voices of America.

In America, the people elect those who will represent them. Once congressman are elected they work when they want and can give themselves more money anytime. The American dream job! They have groups of people who give them money. The more you give, the more you get from them.

Perhaps the constitution should have read, “We who have the most money” instead of “We the people”. Ah, but “We the people” was not changed. Which means Americans can warmly tell any elected official, “Screw you! You work for us”; and not for the people who bribed you or gave more campaign contributions! America, live propaganda free and watch this great video by sunsetfans:

“YOU WORK FOR US”

Abraham Lincoln is an American legend. As president he saved the Union. He is a sign of strength, honesty and leadership. He listened to the voices of his people. He served America even giving up his life for it. He has said:

“Democracy is the government of the people, by the people, for the people.”

“The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but cannot do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves — in their separate, and individual capacities.”

How many of America’s elected can we truly say serve America as Lincoln once did? Even as early as 1939 a movie about corruption in congress was made. “Mr Smith Goes to Washington“. Mr Smith is a good man fighting corruption in congress.

“…another lost cause”

Rep. Joe Wilson, called Obama a liar in front of Obama and Congress. Obama was talking about his mysterious health care bill where the president insisted illegal immigrants would not get free health care. Rep. Joe Wilson rightly said he was a liar. Even today Obama is wasting millions of tax dollars suing Arizona for treating illegal immigrants as “illegal”. Rep. Joe Wilson lost his backbone later and apologized for fear of reprisals. Well, at least he tried. Nevertheless it was a great moment in history.

Rep. Joe Wilson shouted “You lie! 1:28

Heroic efforts from men like Washington and Lincoln are all true and seldom found. Where is America’s backbone? Truth was spoken fearlessly by America long ago. Dr. Martin Luther King certainly was not afraid against the government. His focus was equality for all. The “character” of a person is more important than the color of his skin. He held America accountable to enforce the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

“…America, be true to what you said on paper”- Martin Luther King

Dr. Alveda King (Dr. Martin Luther King’s niece) surely had courage to speak last August. She was unafraid to speak what she believes to be true. Money and her constituents did not influence her speech. She apologized to no one and knows that God is more important.

“…nations moral poverty” – Dr. Alveda King

Elected officials seldom speak that which is true and necessary. They need money and votes to stay in power. They are either like Obama who vote with their party and do whatever their puppet masters tell them; or like Joe Wilson who try to do the right thing but are afraid and lose heart.

So, now America’s future depends on the “people”. Are there enough people willing to sacrifice their time to protest and vote? Can they at least “pray” that God blesses America? Bernard Goldberg rightly called America, “United States of Entertainment”. Americans are fat and happy as long as they are entertained.

Yet, the drums of discontent have begun beating. People are marching and screaming. Those who side with government are calling the dissenters racists. Those who are fed up are shouting “You work for us”. Meaning, “do what we tell you or we vote you out of office”.

Alfonzo Rachel goes to Tea Party rallies often. He talks about the NAACP as the  “National Association of Crying People” and that the “Democrats fought to keep slavery legal”.

Which brings us back to the job of a congressman, president or any elected official. They are supposed to fulfill their promises to us and stand by our constitution. To allow a state like Arizona to protect itself from the drug war it has from Mexico. The president should be born in America and not spend millions to avoid the issue. To bring down the high cost of health care not take it over and force all Americans to buy it with little choice. To allow chaos to continue so government can take over businesses was never the people’s choice.

Passing the health care bill was Obama’s main focus. Obama promised transparency in government yet the public never had access to the bill. We never knew what the bill would make into law until it was passed. Can you imagine buying a car and being told you cannot see what is inside?

He blamed the Republicans for stopping the health care bill. However, his Democrats have the majority in the House and Senate. In other words the Democrats outnumber the Republicans which mean they can vote and pass anything they want. When Obama’s own Democrats questioned the health bill , Obama blamed the Republicans. It was like the teacher blaming the smallest kid in the class when the big bully is hitting everybody. The Republicans looked at Obama like the RCA Victor dog. Obama made an advertising campaign that blamed the Republicans but what he really was doing was trying to persuade his own doubting friends.

Hillary Clinton was not elected in the late 90’s yet she was pushing the same health care bill as Obama. Why? The government makes money from the businesses they control. Money = Power. Hillary is on the same Democratic team as Obama.

The Democratic agenda is big government and more taxes. They want to control as much as possible. However, America is the United States of America. Every state has their own rights just like an individual. The Democrats contradict the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.

The Republican agenda is smaller government and less taxes. Bigger companies make more money and more people are employed. They too get payoffs and cater to those who bribe them. They do not strive hard enough to make things better for family and individuals. They do better than the Demos but it seems they just sit on their hands most of the time. They cater to big business but big business keep Americans employed. The Republicans are not all conservative but all the conservatives are mostly in the Republican party.  However, why do they allow American jobs to go overseas?

Americans should have the right to have better schools for their children. When will it happen? Many choose private schools or home schooling. Obama said he would stop U.S. jobs from going overseas. However, unemployment continues to rise. Fewer jobs are created in America ever since Bill Clinton set up shop overseas in China.

Thanks a lot Bill! Thanks for allowing American nuclear and missile secrets to go to China. Thanks for allowing American jobs to go overseas. Thanks for saying you would give back the money the Chinese illegally gave you as campaign contributions. It sure did help China not America.

President Nixon was threatened with impeachment for spying on the Democrats. Clinton gets illegal financing from the Chinese and it’s ok. “Oops!”,said Clinton. “Bring in Monica and start a war in Kosovo. They’ll forget about China!” They don’t call him “Slick Willy” for nothing.

Former presidential candidate Dr. Alan Keyes made a good point when he asked why everyone was counting every penny under President Bush but now Obama can spend trillions. America never gave Obama and congress blank checks to spend on bailing out their friends. The companies who supported Obama were bailed out by Obama. PAYOFFS THE CHICAGO WAY! Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs were among the many reported by the American media as being “bailed out”. I have never heard anyone disprove Dr. Keyes. They always resort to insults. “Alan Keyes Rips Obamanation”.

“insane children and adolescents in charge of our government” – Alan Keyes

I would like to mention also those who were not bailed out but support Obama. George Soros, Google, SONY Pictures and 20th Century Fox. Soros owns millions of shares of Time Warner. He owns the SKG film library from Viacom. Which means he controls movies like “Gladiator” and “Saving Private Ryan”. I think they should be noted. Money can make a lot of propaganda. Imagine what Obama could do with Google’s help? Already lawmakers are controlling the internet while making it look like they are helping us. Michelle Malkin has a great article on this here.

“When bureaucrats talk about increasing our “access” to x, y or z, what they’re really talking about is increasing exponentially their control over our lives. As it is with the government health care takeover, so it is with the newly approved government plan to “increase” Internet “access.” Call it Webcare.”

Americans needed help from Obama during the Gulf Oil crisis. He told everyone to stop drilling in the Gulf and sent billions to Brazil so they can drill offshore. Thanks for helping America Mr O. Later, before the Nov 2nd election, Obama gave the OK to drill when the Demos were sinking but it was too late.  Georgie Soros invested in Petrobras from Brazil. Soros owns Obama so that is why the American government helped Brazil. Reuters, Bloomberg, Agence France Press ,the Wall Street Journal and now even Fox News have all reported this.

Obama sends billions to Brazil as Soros profits

So, when will congress and the president serve their own people in America? It all depends how many people vote and if there is anyone out there who can honestly represent them. Weak hearts on both sides. Although, the Tea Party is more energetic.

For most people it is just easier to accept the propaganda that Republicans are racists and greedy businessman. Fortunately, Obama has helped them question the lies of the Democratic machine. Recently, Obama tried to sweet talk America again but Velma Hart was able to ask a question that broke the evil spell cast upon millions.

“deeply disappointed”

This week independent Dr Alan Keyes sarcastically spoke the feelings of the Democrats and Republicans, “ Oh, the horror of it all. The pro-Constitution rabble, so many thousands of Americans, cheering, rallying and organizing themselves to re-institute consent of the governed — defying the will of their masters in both major parties, and selecting by fair ballot their own nominees! These peasants — who do they think they are? Free men and women?”

LOL! Yes, how dare Americans want true representation and the American Constitution to be upheld. Does America still have that American feisty spirit that the Founders had against the British Empire? The British had guns and hung many a rebel. What can the chicken spirited congress and Obama do in defiance to the will of the people? Does America have to courage to stand against intimidation and the insults congress have in store for these free men and women?

Will those newly elected by the ‘Tea Party” in 2011 have the courage to stand up for conservative values in the face of the liberal paper tiger? Will they really begin investigations on those slimy Democrats? We have to wait and see. If they do not, Americans need to do what the people did in the first video and stand outside their door and yell, “You work for us!!!”.

The independent thinkers of today still wave the old independent flag , “DONT TREAD ON ME!”. It was waved over 235 years ago in the face of the British. They also demand the same thing as Dr. Martin Luther King demanded in his day :

“…America, be true to what you said on paper”

- Martin Luther King

Google Would Rather Honor The Socialist Anti-Zionist Zamenhof Than The Bill Of Rights

Posted on December 13, 2010 by Brooks Bayne in Articles

(repost from brooksbayne.com to begin a series of posts about neo-Marxists in corporate America)

Anytime you pay attention to what Google decides to honor, you find out a little bit more about the worldview of the people who work for the company.

About a year ago, on December 15th, 2009 Google was faced with the opportunity to honor the anniversary of the Bill of Rights. Google declined, even though Dec. 15th is National Bill of Rights Day as instituted by FDR (ironic, I know). Instead, Google chose to honor L.L. Zamenhof, an oculist and the creator of Esperanto, on what would have been his 150th birthday, via the image above in one of their Google Doodles. Zamenhof’s claim to fame is that he created this failed language experiment where those who used the language were Marxists and socialists. Lesser known is that Zamenhof also failed in an attempt to create a  philosophy called Hillelism – he regarded the expression of religious conviction a “barbarity”.

The word esperanto means “one who hopes” in the language itself. Hardly a surprise as hope and change are long-standing Marxist platitudes. Zamenhof was an anti-Zionist, socialist “Jew”. People went to great lengths to hide Zamenhof’s Jewish heritage as he became popular in anti-Zionist, socialist circles. In fact, Louis Emile Javal, famous ophthalmologist and close associate of Zamenhof’s, also a “social reformer”, was proud that, “Of 700 articles in the press, only one mentioned Zamenhof’s Jewishness.” Sounds like typical postmodern New York City Jews, doesn’t it – or maybe even like the George Soros, anti-Semitic kind of “Jew”.

Well, what do you know, after a little digging, I found that George Soros’ dad, Tivador Soros (Soros, an adopted name, means “to soar” in Esperanto), founded the Esperanto literary magazine Literatura Mondo (Literary World) in 1922 and edited it until 1924. For those who’ve been living under a rock and don’t know who Soros is, he’s the foreign, hypocritical Marxist who has invested tens of millions of dollars in ultra-leftist, American organizations like Center for American Progress, MoveOn, America Coming Together, Democracy Alliance, and Media Matters for the purpose of advancing Marxism in America. George was taught Esperanto from birth, and is one of the rare native speakers of the kooky language. Interesting to note that Esperanto was known as the “the Latin of the Proletariat” (Does that mean that only communist doctors and lawyers spoke it?). According to Soros, he “…grew up in a Jewish, anti-Semitic home.” Huh? Jewish anti-Semites? Hmm, that should probably read: Jew-ish. Leave it to Soros and his ilk to try and straddle that fence. There’s some insight in all this as to why the MSM and many American progressives are anti-Semitic, but that’s the subject of an upcoming blog post.

The Bill of Rights must be some obscure item from America’s past, unworthy of Google’s interest, paling in comparison to the wonders of some made up, socialist Pig Latin. But since Soros has become a hero to the American leftists, maybe that has some merit with who Google honors.

As Google’s CEO, Eric Schmidt, says, “If there’s something you don’t want others to know, you then you shouldn’t be doing it.” I suppose Eric wants us to know about his Marxist, anti-Israel stance. Thanks, Eric, now we know. It’s no strange accident that Obama pulled this Marxist-loving, Schmidt, into his wacky sphere of advisers. Back in 2008, Schmidt was pushing the government for an “innovation bailout”, a crazy government-funded effort to create jobs in the tech industry.

You shall know them by their fruits.

Fox News, Soros’ White Whale?

Posted on December 7, 2010 by Xavier Lerma in Opinion

Recently, billionaire George Soros had surrendered supporting the Democrats in America. Now Soros seeks revenge for his failure. Soros’ new plan is to attack only ONE TV STATION that airs contrary beliefs to Mr. Soros’ agenda. According to the New York Times Michael D. Shear,

Mr. Soros, a billionaire who has a
history of supporting liberal politicians and causes, accused Fox News
hosts of “incendiary rhetoric” and said he hoped that his money would
be used “in an effort to more widely publicize the challenge Fox News
poses to civil and informed discourse in our democracy.”

Fox News, Soros’ White Whale?

“Soros, I have heard of Fox News – but was it not Fox News that stole your treasure and says bad things against thee?”, said Vivian Schiller

“Who told thee that?”, cried Soros. “Aye, it was Fox News that dismantled me and my plans! Aye, aye!”, he shouted with a terrific, loud, animal sob, like that of a heart stricken moose; “Aye, aye! It was that accursed Fox News that mocks me; made a fool of me and the Democrats for ever and a day!”

Then Soros shouted, “Aye, aye! and I’ll chase them round Good Hope, and round the Horn, and round the Norway Maelstrom, and round perdition’s flames before I give them up! And this is what you have shipped for men! To chase Fox News on both sides of land, and over all sides of earth, till it spouts black blood and rolls fin out. What say ye, men, will ye splice hands on it now? I think ye do look brave.” said Soros.

“Aye, aye!” shouted Media Matters, NPR and the rest of Soros’ network. “A sharp eye for Fox; a sharp lance for Fox News. Death to Fox news! Death to Fox news!

Soros and his minions could easily play in Herman Melville’s novel, “Moby Dick”. All Soros needs is an ivory peg leg.

In other words, Soros is mad at Fox because he believes they are the reason the Democrats lost last November.

I got news for you Soros. The fascists you helped in capturing your own Jewish people were defeated in France and Italy by Americans. Americans love freedom of speech, freedom of the press and will not tolerate another Hitler who suppresses those freedoms. America is where kings and billionaires can buy goods and even souls but Americans will not accept a tyrant.

IF YOU DISAGREE WITH FOX, CHANGE THE CHANNEL! Why would anyone watch a show they disagree with? I’m sure Soros can hire someone to switch the channel to ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and a host of other news channels. Watch CNN’s Piers Morgan beat #1 Fox News. CNN’s new British host said, “I’m going to be there to win… it’s time to kick some ratings butt!”. Fox is still number one, but enjoy the show Soros and chill out.

Why would anyone watch a show they disagree with? Of course Soros doesn’t watch Fox! He doesn’t want you to watch Fox. Soros says he’s helping you but he just doesn’t want you to know what Fox News is broadcasting. Soros says he is a man of Democracy yet he does not want this one, lonely tv station to have their legal right of freedom of the press. The “biggest spider on the web” as I once called him , has an agenda.

Soros wants,

• Open borders (no such thing as illegal immigrants)
• Legalize all drugs in America
• Remove Christianity from public view.

Fox News has programs that favor defending America’s borders, fighting drugs and favoring Christianity. That pretty much pops Soros’ balloon. He has also seen the success of the Tea Party and is blaming Fox which is the only network to favor the tea parties. That’s right! Soros is afraid of ONE TV STATION. Media Matters is also afraid of only one tv station..

Media Matters job is to attack Fox News on the internet and elsewhere 24/7. Media Matters in the past would never admit they received money from Soros but now the cat is out of the bag. Michael D. Shear wrote,

“We are especially pleased that in this moment of hidden right-wing billionaire money corrupting our democracy, Mr. Soros, upon deciding to support our efforts, quickly and transparently has made that support public,” the statement from Media Matters says.

Supposedly Fox News is supported by “hidden right-wing billionaire money corrupting our democracy”. Actually, like all TV stations except PBS, advertisers support them. The more people watch the more advertisers there are which equals $$$. Media Matters is telling us ONE TV STATION has corrupted America. OH NO!. I wonder what happened to ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN? Who supports all these liberal and Democratic stations? Advertisers and the people who watch them.

Beware the Fox in the Hen-House!

Soros is protecting Americans from the Fox. That is all he is doing. Just like he protected his own people from the Nazis. He was just telling Adolf Eichmann where the money was. It wasn’t his fault the fascists took away his people and murdered them. So what if Soros pretended to be Christian. Now he wants to protect you and me from the Fox. Don’t you feel safe? Soros is the same now as he was when he betrayed his own people. Except now he has billions of dollars to help you and me. Isn’t that just great?

New York Times Michael D. Shear wrote,

“Soros Donates $1 Million to Media Matters”

He wrote Media Matters stated October 20th how they came out of the closet and finally admitted they received money from Soros. His article is here.

I feel safer already don’t you? Henny Penny and America is so grateful that Soros protects us from that bad old Fox. Thank you Mr. Soros. We know you won’t deceive us like you did in France where you were convicted of insider trading. We don’t care if you are a felon or that you ruin other countries economies. Just as long as you keep us from that bad old Fox.

Fox News tells lies and even favors Christianity. We can’t have that. No, sir. Soros will not only destroy the Fox but also give us an alternative like National Public Radio (NPR). NPR recently fired the only black journalist they had because he said bad things about Muslims. Shame on him. NPR to the rescue!

NPR is government-funded which means Americans are forced to pay NPR. New York Times Elizabeth Jensen wrote that Soros gave

$1.8 million to NPR

His money will help Americans fight conservative talk radio. Jensen wrote, “NPR has received a $1.8 million grant from the Open Society Foundations to begin a project called Impact of Government that is intended to add at least 100 journalists at NPR member radio stations in all 50 states over the next three years..”

NPR is fair and not like Fox. NPR would never fire people like CNN, who got rid of Lou Dobbs, Glenn Beck and Rick Sanchez. NPR would never do that. Would they?

NPR fires 10 year veteran Juan Williams

Williams who is a liberal was fired October 20th after he said that after 911 he gets nervous on the plane when he sees someone dressed in muslim clothes. Williams is a liberal who goes on Fox News from time to time as a commentator to voice the liberal viewpoint.

Liberals on Fox?

Although Soros would have you to believe that Fox is all conservative and is corrupting the country with lies, Fox has several liberals along with Geraldo Rivera, Bob Beckel, Will Ferrell, the court jester John Stewart and many others who voice their opinions. They all don’t have shows like Geraldo Rivera but they are guest commentators like Juan Williams. They have time to give it their best shot and state their viewpoints.

So what exactly did Juan Williams do to get fired? NPR’s David Folkenflik wrote:

“NPR News has terminated the contract of longtime news analyst Juan
Williams after remarks he made on the Fox News Channel about Muslims.

Williams appeared Monday on The O’Reilly Factor, and host Bill
O’Reilly asked him to comment on the idea that the U.S. is facing a
dilemma with Muslims.

Williams responded: “Look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of
books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country.
But when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who
are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying
themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get
nervous.”

Williams also warned O’Reilly against blaming all Muslims for
“extremists,” saying Christians shouldn’t be blamed for Oklahoma City
bomber Timothy McVeigh.

But strong criticism followed Williams’ comments.

Late Wednesday night, NPR issued a statement praising Williams as a
valuable contributor but saying it had given him notice that it is
severing his contract. “His remarks on The O’Reilly Factor this past
Monday were inconsistent with our editorial standards and practices,
and undermined his credibility as a news analyst with NPR,” the
statement read.

Williams’ presence on the largely conservative and often contentious
prime-time talk shows of Fox News has long been a sore point with NPR
News executives.”

After the incident millions called NPR to protest. Liberals like Whoopee Goldberg and Barbara Walters said the firing was wrong. Where was the NAACP to stand up for poor Juan?

Andy Barr for “Politico” wrote:

“Juan Williams said Friday morning that NPR fired him this week because
the radio network had become “vindictive” over his appearances on Fox
News.

“I knew about their antagonism toward Fox. I knew they didn’t like
it,” Williams said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“NPR, and especially this last group of managers, became vindictive
[and,] as you can see, personal in terms of their antagonism toward
me,” he said.

NPR CEO Vivian Schiller on Thursday said that Williams should have
kept his comments between himself and “his psychiatrist or his
publicist.” Schiller later apologized for the comment.”

Soros is a puppeteer according to Williams. At around 8:46, he says,

“He’s the puppeteer” Soros conversation between 8:20 and 8:50

Soros donated 1.8 million to NPR and tells NPR to release anyone associated with Fox News his nemesis. So out goes Juan Williams and NPR’s Maria Liasson is next. She also appears on Fox News every now and then. .

What will Soros do next? Buy out cable companies so he can ban Fox? Then what will he do after that? Buy all the TV stations or force TV antennas off the market? He does all that for ONE tv station even though there are so many other stations to watch other than Fox News his nemesis.

Soros gets angry between 4:40 and 6:12

Soros can try to censor the one TV station called Fox News, Juan Williams and other reporters who tell the truth, but Schwartz (a.k.a. Soros) will never succeed in a country where freedom of speech and freedom of the press is law. Soros may spit on the Bill of Rights but in America it’s etched in stone and in every American’s heart.

READ ‘EM AND WEEP SOROS!

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

-First Amendment of the United States of America

.
Xavier Lerma