The Graph Network > Delegar

Delegar

Reading time: 7 min

Delegators are network participants who delegate (i.e., "stake") GRT to one or more Indexers. Delegators help secure the network without running a Graph Node themselves.

Delegators earn a portion of an Indexer's query fees and rewards by delegating to them. The amount of queries an Indexer can process depends on their own stake, the delegated stake, and the price the Indexer charges for each query. Therefore, the more stake that is allocated to an Indexer, the more potential queries they can process.

Guía del Delegador

Enlace a esta sección

This guide will explain how to be an effective Delegator in the Graph Network. Delegators share the earnings of the protocol alongside all Indexers based on their delegated stake. A Delegator must use their best judgment to choose Indexers based on multiple factors. Please note this guide will not cover steps such as setting up Metamask properly, as that information is widely available on the internet.

There are three sections in this guide:

  • Los riesgos de delegar tokens en la red de The Graph
  • Cómo calcular los rendimientos que te esperan siendo Delegador
  • Una guía en video que muestra los pasos para delegar en la interfaz de usuario de Graph Network

Riesgos de la Delegación

Enlace a esta sección

A continuación se enumeran los principales riesgos de ser un Delegador en el protocolo.

La tarifa de delegación

Enlace a esta sección

Los Delegadores no pueden ser recortados por mal comportamiento, pero existe un impuesto sobre los Delegadores para desincentivar la toma de malas decisiones que puedan perjudicar la integridad de la red.

It is important to understand that every time you delegate, you will be charged 0.5%. This means that if you are delegating 1000 GRT, you will automatically burn 5 GRT.

In order to be safe, a Delegator should calculate their potential return when delegating to an Indexer. For example, a Delegator might calculate how many days it will take before they have earned back the 0.5% tax on their delegation.

El período de unbonding (desvinculación) de la delegación

Enlace a esta sección

Whenever a Delegator wants to undelegate, their tokens are subject to a 28-day unbonding period. This means they cannot transfer their tokens or earn any rewards for 28 days.

Another thing to consider is how to choose an Indexer wisely. If you choose an Indexer that is not trustworthy or not doing a good job, you will want to undelegate. This means you will be losing a lot of opportunities to earn rewards, which can be just as bad as burning GRT.

Delegation unbonding Ten en cuenta la tasa del 0,5% en la UI de la Delegación, así como el periodo de unbonding de 28 días.

Elige un Indexador fiable, que pague recompensas justas a sus Delegadores

Enlace a esta sección

This is an important aspect to understand. First, let's discuss three very important values, which are the Delegation Parameters.

Indexing Reward Cut - The indexing reward cut is the portion of the rewards that the Indexer will keep for themselves. This means that if an Indexer's rewards are set to 100%, as a Delegator you will get 0 indexing rewards. If you see it set at 80% in the UI, that means as a Delegator, you will receive 20%. An important note - at the beginning of the network, Indexing Rewards will account for the majority of the rewards.

Indexing Reward Cut El Indexador de arriba está dando a los Delegadores el 90% de las recompensas generadas. El del medio está dando a los Delegadores un 20%. El de abajo está dando un ~83% a sus Delegadores

  • Query Fee Cut - This works exactly like the Indexing Reward Cut. However, this applies explicitly to returns on the query fees the Indexer collects. It should be noted that at the start of the network, returns from query fees will be very small compared to the indexing reward. It is recommended that you pay attention to the network to determine when the query fees in the network will start to be more significant.

As you can see, in order to choose the right Indexer, you must consider multiple things. This is why we highly recommend exploring The Graph Discord to determine which Indexers have the best social and technical reputations and which reward Delegators consistently. Many of the Indexers are very active in Discord and will be happy to answer your questions. Many of them have been Indexing for months on the testnet, and they are doing their best to help Delegators earn a good return, as it improves the health and success of the network.

Calculando el retorno esperado para los Delegadores

Enlace a esta sección

A Delegator must consider a lot of factors when determining the return. These include:

  • Un Delegador técnico también puede ver la capacidad de los Indexadores para usar los tokens que han sido delegados y la capacidad de disponibilidad a su favor. Si un Indexador no está asignando todos los tokens disponibles, no está obteniendo el beneficio máximo que podría obtener para sí mismo o para sus Delegadores.
  • Right now, in the network an Indexer can choose to close an allocation and collect rewards anytime between 1 and 28 days. So, it is possible that an Indexer might have a lot of rewards they still need to collect, and thus, their total rewards are low. This should be taken into consideration in the early days.

Siempre ten en cuenta la tarifa por consulta y el recorte de recompensas para el Indexador

Enlace a esta sección

Como se ha descrito en las secciones anteriores, debes elegir un indexador que sea transparente y honesto a la hora de establecer su corte de tarifa de consulta y cortes de tarifa de indexación. Un Delegador también debe fijarse en el tiempo de enfriamiento de los parámetros para ver de cuánto tiempo disponen. Una vez hecho esto, es bastante sencillo calcular la cantidad de recompensas que reciben los Delegadores. La fórmula es:

Delegación Imagen 3

Tener en cuenta el pool de delegación de cada Indexador

Enlace a esta sección

Otra cosa que tiene que tener en cuenta un Delegador es qué proporción del Pool de Delegación posee. Todas las recompensas de la delegación se reparten de forma equitativa, con un simple reequilibrio del pool determinado por la cantidad que el Delegador haya depositado en el pool. De este modo, el Delegador recibe una parte del pool:

Fórmula para compartir

Using this formula, we can see that it is possible for an Indexer offering only 20% to Delegators to actually provide a better reward than an Indexer giving 90%.

Therefore, a Delegator can do the math to determine that the Indexer offering 20% to Delegators is offering a better return.

Considerar la capacidad de delegación

Enlace a esta sección

Otra cosa a tener en cuenta es la capacidad de delegación. Actualmente, el Ratio de Delegación está fijado en 16. Esto significa que si un Indexador ha stakeado 1.000.000 GRT, su Capacidad de Delegación es de 16.000.000 GRT de tokens delegados que puede utilizar en el protocolo. Cualquier token delegado que supere esta cantidad diluirá todas las recompensas del Delegador.

Imagine an Indexer with 100,000,000 GRT delegated to them, but their capacity is only 16,000,000 GRT. This means effectively, 84,000,000 GRT tokens are not being used to earn tokens. So, all the Delegators and the Indexer, are earning way less rewards than they could be.

Therefore, a Delegator should always consider the Delegation Capacity of an Indexer, and factor it into their decision making.

Preguntas Frecuentes del Delegador y Errores

Enlace a esta sección

Error de "Transacción Pendiente" en MetaMask

Enlace a esta sección

When I try to delegate my transaction in MetaMask, it appears as "Pending" or "Queued" for longer than expected. What should I do?

At times, attempts to delegate to indexers via MetaMask can fail and result in prolonged periods of "Pending" or "Queued" transaction attempts.

For example, a user may attempt to delegate with an insufficient gas fee relative to the current prices, resulting in the transaction attempt displaying as "Pending" in their MetaMask wallet for 15+ minutes. When this occurs, a user can attempt subsequent transactions, but these will only be processed until the initial transaction is mined, as transactions for an address must be processed in order. In such cases, these transactions can be cancelled in MetaMask, but the transactions attempts will accrue gas fees without any guarantee that subsequent attempts will be successful.

A simpler resolution to this bug is restarting the browser (e.g., using "abort:restart" in the address bar), which will cancel all previous attempts without gas being subtracted from the wallet. Several users who have encountered this issue have reported successful transactions after restarting their browser and attempting to delegate.

Video guía de la interfaz de usuario de la red

Enlace a esta sección

This video guide fully reviews this document and explains how to consider everything in it while interacting with the UI.

Editar página

Anterior
Indexación
Siguiente
Curación
Editar página