The Graph Network > Delegazione

Delegazione

Reading time: 7 min

Delegators are network participants who delegate (i.e., "stake") GRT to one or more Indexers. Delegators help secure the network without running a Graph Node themselves.

Delegators earn a portion of an Indexer's query fees and rewards by delegating to them. The amount of queries an Indexer can process depends on their own stake, the delegated stake, and the price the Indexer charges for each query. Therefore, the more stake that is allocated to an Indexer, the more potential queries they can process.

Guida per i delegator

Collegamento a questa sezione

This guide will explain how to be an effective Delegator in the Graph Network. Delegators share the earnings of the protocol alongside all Indexers based on their delegated stake. A Delegator must use their best judgment to choose Indexers based on multiple factors. Please note this guide will not cover steps such as setting up Metamask properly, as that information is widely available on the internet.

There are three sections in this guide:

  • I rischi della delegazione dei token in The Graph Network
  • Come calcolare i rendimenti previsti come Delegator
  • Una guida video che mostra i passi per delegare nel UI di The Graph Network

Rischi di delegazione

Collegamento a questa sezione

Di seguito sono elencati i principali rischi essere il Delegator nel protocollo.

La tassa di delegazione

Collegamento a questa sezione

I delegator non possono essere penalizzati per un comportamento scorretto, ma c'è una tassa sui delegator per disincentivare un processo decisionale insufficiente che potrebbero danneggiare l'integrità della rete.

It is important to understand that every time you delegate, you will be charged 0.5%. This means that if you are delegating 1000 GRT, you will automatically burn 5 GRT.

In order to be safe, a Delegator should calculate their potential return when delegating to an Indexer. For example, a Delegator might calculate how many days it will take before they have earned back the 0.5% tax on their delegation.

Il periodo di sblocco di delegazione

Collegamento a questa sezione

Whenever a Delegator wants to undelegate, their tokens are subject to a 28-day unbonding period. This means they cannot transfer their tokens or earn any rewards for 28 days.

Another thing to consider is how to choose an Indexer wisely. If you choose an Indexer that is not trustworthy or not doing a good job, you will want to undelegate. This means you will be losing a lot of opportunities to earn rewards, which can be just as bad as burning GRT.

Sblocco di Delegator Nota la commissione del 0,5% nel UI della delegazione, così come il periodo di sblocco di 28 giorni. periodo di sblocco.

Scegliere un Indexer affidabile con una giusta ricompensa per i Delegator

Collegamento a questa sezione

This is an important aspect to understand. First, let's discuss three very important values, which are the Delegation Parameters.

Indexing Reward Cut - The indexing reward cut is the portion of the rewards that the Indexer will keep for themselves. This means that if an Indexer's rewards are set to 100%, as a Delegator you will get 0 indexing rewards. If you see it set at 80% in the UI, that means as a Delegator, you will receive 20%. An important note - at the beginning of the network, Indexing Rewards will account for the majority of the rewards.

Taglio delle ricompense dell'indicizzazione Il top Indexer sta dando ai Delegator il 90% delle ricompense. Il centrale dà ai Delegator il 20%. Quello in basso dà ai Delegator ~83%.

  • Query Fee Cut - This works exactly like the Indexing Reward Cut. However, this applies explicitly to returns on the query fees the Indexer collects. It should be noted that at the start of the network, returns from query fees will be very small compared to the indexing reward. It is recommended that you pay attention to the network to determine when the query fees in the network will start to be more significant.

As you can see, in order to choose the right Indexer, you must consider multiple things. This is why we highly recommend exploring The Graph Discord to determine which Indexers have the best social and technical reputations and which reward Delegators consistently. Many of the Indexers are very active in Discord and will be happy to answer your questions. Many of them have been Indexing for months on the testnet, and they are doing their best to help Delegators earn a good return, as it improves the health and success of the network.

Calcolo del rendimento previsto dei Delegator

Collegamento a questa sezione

A Delegator must consider a lot of factors when determining the return. These include:

  • Un Delegator tecnico può anche esaminare la capacità dell' Indexer di utilizzare i token delegati a sua disposizione. Se un Indexer non sta allocando tutti i token disponibili, non sta guadagnando il massimo profitto che potrebbe ottenere per sé o per i suoi Delegator.
  • Right now, in the network an Indexer can choose to close an allocation and collect rewards anytime between 1 and 28 days. So, it is possible that an Indexer might have a lot of rewards they still need to collect, and thus, their total rewards are low. This should be taken into consideration in the early days.

Considerando la riduzione delle tariffe di query e la riduzione delle tariffe di indicizzazione

Collegamento a questa sezione

Come descritto nelle sezioni precedenti, è necessario scegliere un Indexer che sia trasparente e onesto nell'impostare il taglio delle tariffe di query e tagli delle tariffe di indicizzazione. Il Delegator dovrebbe anche controllare il tempo di Cooldown dei Parametri per vedere quanto tempo di riserva ha a disposizione. Una volta fatto questo, è abbastanza semplice calcolare la quantità delle ricompense che i Delegator ricevono. La formula è:

Immagine delegator 3

Considerando il delegation pool del Indexer

Collegamento a questa sezione

Un altro aspetto che un Delegator deve considerare è il proporzione del Delegation Pool che possiede. Tutte le ricompense della delega sono condivise in modo uniforme, con un semplice ribilanciamento del pool determinato dall'importo che il Delegator ha depositato nel pool. In questo modo il Delegator ha una quota del pool:

Formula di condivisione

Using this formula, we can see that it is possible for an Indexer offering only 20% to Delegators to actually provide a better reward than an Indexer giving 90%.

Therefore, a Delegator can do the math to determine that the Indexer offering 20% to Delegators is offering a better return.

Considerando la capacità di delegazione

Collegamento a questa sezione

Un altro aspetto da considerare è la capacità di Delegator. Attualmente, il Delegation Ratio è impostato su 16. Ciò significa che se un Indexer ha fatto un stake di 1,000,000 GRT, la sua Delegation Capacity è di 16,000,000 di GRT di token delegati che può utilizzare nel protocollo. Tutti i token delegati che superano questa quantità diluiranno tutte le ricompense dei Delegator.

Imagine an Indexer with 100,000,000 GRT delegated to them, but their capacity is only 16,000,000 GRT. This means effectively, 84,000,000 GRT tokens are not being used to earn tokens. So, all the Delegators and the Indexer, are earning way less rewards than they could be.

Therefore, a Delegator should always consider the Delegation Capacity of an Indexer, and factor it into their decision making.

FAQ e bug dei Delegator

Collegamento a questa sezione

MetaMask "Transazione in sospeso" Bug

Collegamento a questa sezione

When I try to delegate my transaction in MetaMask, it appears as "Pending" or "Queued" for longer than expected. What should I do?

At times, attempts to delegate to indexers via MetaMask can fail and result in prolonged periods of "Pending" or "Queued" transaction attempts.

For example, a user may attempt to delegate with an insufficient gas fee relative to the current prices, resulting in the transaction attempt displaying as "Pending" in their MetaMask wallet for 15+ minutes. When this occurs, a user can attempt subsequent transactions, but these will only be processed until the initial transaction is mined, as transactions for an address must be processed in order. In such cases, these transactions can be cancelled in MetaMask, but the transactions attempts will accrue gas fees without any guarantee that subsequent attempts will be successful.

A simpler resolution to this bug is restarting the browser (e.g., using "abort:restart" in the address bar), which will cancel all previous attempts without gas being subtracted from the wallet. Several users who have encountered this issue have reported successful transactions after restarting their browser and attempting to delegate.

Guida video per UI della rete

Collegamento a questa sezione

This video guide fully reviews this document and explains how to consider everything in it while interacting with the UI.

Modifica pagina

Precedente
Indicizzazione
Successivo
Curating
Modifica pagina